一个导航和探索论证解决方案空间的可视化工具

Q3 Arts and Humanities Comma Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.3233/FAIA220146
Raimund Dachselt, S. A. Gaggl, M. Krötzsch, J. Méndez, Dominik Rusovac, Mei Yang
{"title":"一个导航和探索论证解决方案空间的可视化工具","authors":"Raimund Dachselt, S. A. Gaggl, M. Krötzsch, J. Méndez, Dominik Rusovac, Mei Yang","doi":"10.3233/FAIA220146","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":". Recent developments on solvers for abstract argumentation frameworks (AFs) made them capable to compute extensions for many semantics efficiently. However, for many input instances these solution spaces can become very large and incomprehensible. So far, for the further exploration and investigation of the AF solution space the user needs to use post-processing methods or handcrafted tools. To compare and explore the solution spaces of two selected semantics, we propose an approach that visually supports the user, via a combination of dimensionality reduction of argumentation extensions and a projection of extensions to sets of accepted or rejected arguments. We introduce the novel web-based visualization tool N EXAS that allows for an interactive exploration of the solution space together with a statistical analysis of the acceptance of individual arguments for the selected semantics, as well as provides an interactive correlation matrix for the acceptance of arguments. We validate the tool with a walk-through along three use cases.","PeriodicalId":36616,"journal":{"name":"Comma","volume":"25 1","pages":"116-127"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"NEXAS: A Visual Tool for Navigating and Exploring Argumentation Solution Spaces\",\"authors\":\"Raimund Dachselt, S. A. Gaggl, M. Krötzsch, J. Méndez, Dominik Rusovac, Mei Yang\",\"doi\":\"10.3233/FAIA220146\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\". Recent developments on solvers for abstract argumentation frameworks (AFs) made them capable to compute extensions for many semantics efficiently. However, for many input instances these solution spaces can become very large and incomprehensible. So far, for the further exploration and investigation of the AF solution space the user needs to use post-processing methods or handcrafted tools. To compare and explore the solution spaces of two selected semantics, we propose an approach that visually supports the user, via a combination of dimensionality reduction of argumentation extensions and a projection of extensions to sets of accepted or rejected arguments. We introduce the novel web-based visualization tool N EXAS that allows for an interactive exploration of the solution space together with a statistical analysis of the acceptance of individual arguments for the selected semantics, as well as provides an interactive correlation matrix for the acceptance of arguments. We validate the tool with a walk-through along three use cases.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36616,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Comma\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"116-127\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Comma\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3233/FAIA220146\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Comma","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/FAIA220146","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

. 抽象论证框架(AFs)求解器的最新发展使它们能够有效地计算许多语义的扩展。然而,对于许多输入实例,这些解决方案空间可能变得非常大且难以理解。到目前为止,为了进一步探索和调查自动对焦解决方案空间,用户需要使用后处理方法或手工制作工具。为了比较和探索两个选定语义的解空间,我们提出了一种视觉上支持用户的方法,通过将论证扩展的降维和扩展到可接受或拒绝的论证集的投影相结合。我们介绍了一种新颖的基于网络的可视化工具N EXAS,它允许对解决方案空间进行交互式探索,并对所选语义的单个参数的接受度进行统计分析,同时为参数的接受度提供交互式相关矩阵。我们通过三个用例的演练来验证这个工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
NEXAS: A Visual Tool for Navigating and Exploring Argumentation Solution Spaces
. Recent developments on solvers for abstract argumentation frameworks (AFs) made them capable to compute extensions for many semantics efficiently. However, for many input instances these solution spaces can become very large and incomprehensible. So far, for the further exploration and investigation of the AF solution space the user needs to use post-processing methods or handcrafted tools. To compare and explore the solution spaces of two selected semantics, we propose an approach that visually supports the user, via a combination of dimensionality reduction of argumentation extensions and a projection of extensions to sets of accepted or rejected arguments. We introduce the novel web-based visualization tool N EXAS that allows for an interactive exploration of the solution space together with a statistical analysis of the acceptance of individual arguments for the selected semantics, as well as provides an interactive correlation matrix for the acceptance of arguments. We validate the tool with a walk-through along three use cases.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Comma
Comma Arts and Humanities-Conservation
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Abstract Argumentation with Conditional Preferences No man is an island entire of itself: Legal frameworks and the relocation of a nation’s archive due to rising sea levels Sunspot observations and glacier images. Archival research partnerships focusing on modern climate research 气象档案在气象发展史中的角色转变及发展趋势 Redrawing historical weather data and participatory archives for the future
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1