美国高等教育

M. Fifolt
{"title":"美国高等教育","authors":"M. Fifolt","doi":"10.5860/choice.51-5145","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"HIGHER EDUCATION IN AMERICA BOK, D. 2013. PRINCETON: PRINCETON UNIVERSITY PRESS. 479 PP.Reviewed by Matthew FifoltHigher Education in America is a compelling and comprehensive overview of the systems, structures, and relevant issues in higher education in the United States. Written in a straightforward and authoritative style, Bok discusses the nature and scope of u.s. higher education and describes the strengths and potential vulnerabilities of a system that encompasses such differing institutions as community colleges, research universities, and for-profit institutions.Modeling the principles of scientific inquiry, the author frames the text with the following key questions:* How vigorously are u.s. universities responding to their emerging problems and opportunities?* Which of the many criticisms of u.s. higher education institutions' activities are truly valid, and which are unfounded or highly exaggerated?* What can u.s. colleges do to improve their performance, and how can such reforms best be brought about? (Bok Z013, p. 4)In each section of the book, Bok provides evidence to support or refute claims relevant to these primary questions. The sections are broad in scope and cover the context of higher education (e.g, its history, purposes, and governance) as well as the concepts of undergraduate and graduate education; professional education; research; and conclusions.Bok notes that as the education system in the United States has evolved, colleges and universities have codified the tripartite mission of higher education to include teaching, research, and service. More recently, a number of schools have added economic development as an accompanying institutional aim. The author acknowledges that colleges and universities can have multiple and complementary goals and that it is, indeed, inevitable that they do given the complex nature of the modern multiversity (Kerr 1963).Yet Bok cautions higher education leaders against taking on initiatives that divert their efforts from achieving their institutions' established mission and goals. Specifically, he regards the variety of institutions that comprise the u.s. education system as one of its greatest strengths and therefore recommends that institutions strive to do what they do well rather than succumb to the pressure to become something they are not (e.g, community colleges aspiring to become four-year institutions, four-year institutions aspiring to become comprehensive institutions, etc.).Despite the challenges associated with maintaining a disparate and distributed system, Bok suggests that the values and norms that define the academic community are core strengths of the education enterprise in the United States. Across institutional type, these values and norms provide a framework for defining responsibilities, establishing principles that guide behavior, delimiting individual actions, setting mutual expectations, and resolving differences of opinion.In persuasive and potentially controversial statements, the author encourages college and university leaders to divest themselves of all activities that others could do as well or better, including ownership of teaching hospitals and activation of programs designed for the sole purpose of generating revenue. Bok notes that these endeavors are often costly and complicated and can lead to unforeseen consequences that ultimately discredit the institution. Further, non-essential activities frequently consume the time and energy of education leaders yet do little to strengthen the core mission of the institution.Bok is especially critical of intercollegiate athletics programs, which he calls \"a flagrant example of universities sacrificing academic standards in the pursuit of profit\" (p. 351). In fact, given the current state of competition, intercollegiate athletics could easily be considered antithetical to higher education. Yet the author reluctantly admits that \"the cost of abandoning a high profile sport-in both practical and political terms-is now too great for the colleges involved to contemplate\" (p. …","PeriodicalId":75260,"journal":{"name":"Tribal college and university research journal","volume":"16 1","pages":"65"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Higher Education in America\",\"authors\":\"M. Fifolt\",\"doi\":\"10.5860/choice.51-5145\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"HIGHER EDUCATION IN AMERICA BOK, D. 2013. PRINCETON: PRINCETON UNIVERSITY PRESS. 479 PP.Reviewed by Matthew FifoltHigher Education in America is a compelling and comprehensive overview of the systems, structures, and relevant issues in higher education in the United States. Written in a straightforward and authoritative style, Bok discusses the nature and scope of u.s. higher education and describes the strengths and potential vulnerabilities of a system that encompasses such differing institutions as community colleges, research universities, and for-profit institutions.Modeling the principles of scientific inquiry, the author frames the text with the following key questions:* How vigorously are u.s. universities responding to their emerging problems and opportunities?* Which of the many criticisms of u.s. higher education institutions' activities are truly valid, and which are unfounded or highly exaggerated?* What can u.s. colleges do to improve their performance, and how can such reforms best be brought about? (Bok Z013, p. 4)In each section of the book, Bok provides evidence to support or refute claims relevant to these primary questions. The sections are broad in scope and cover the context of higher education (e.g, its history, purposes, and governance) as well as the concepts of undergraduate and graduate education; professional education; research; and conclusions.Bok notes that as the education system in the United States has evolved, colleges and universities have codified the tripartite mission of higher education to include teaching, research, and service. More recently, a number of schools have added economic development as an accompanying institutional aim. The author acknowledges that colleges and universities can have multiple and complementary goals and that it is, indeed, inevitable that they do given the complex nature of the modern multiversity (Kerr 1963).Yet Bok cautions higher education leaders against taking on initiatives that divert their efforts from achieving their institutions' established mission and goals. Specifically, he regards the variety of institutions that comprise the u.s. education system as one of its greatest strengths and therefore recommends that institutions strive to do what they do well rather than succumb to the pressure to become something they are not (e.g, community colleges aspiring to become four-year institutions, four-year institutions aspiring to become comprehensive institutions, etc.).Despite the challenges associated with maintaining a disparate and distributed system, Bok suggests that the values and norms that define the academic community are core strengths of the education enterprise in the United States. Across institutional type, these values and norms provide a framework for defining responsibilities, establishing principles that guide behavior, delimiting individual actions, setting mutual expectations, and resolving differences of opinion.In persuasive and potentially controversial statements, the author encourages college and university leaders to divest themselves of all activities that others could do as well or better, including ownership of teaching hospitals and activation of programs designed for the sole purpose of generating revenue. Bok notes that these endeavors are often costly and complicated and can lead to unforeseen consequences that ultimately discredit the institution. Further, non-essential activities frequently consume the time and energy of education leaders yet do little to strengthen the core mission of the institution.Bok is especially critical of intercollegiate athletics programs, which he calls \\\"a flagrant example of universities sacrificing academic standards in the pursuit of profit\\\" (p. 351). In fact, given the current state of competition, intercollegiate athletics could easily be considered antithetical to higher education. Yet the author reluctantly admits that \\\"the cost of abandoning a high profile sport-in both practical and political terms-is now too great for the colleges involved to contemplate\\\" (p. …\",\"PeriodicalId\":75260,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Tribal college and university research journal\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"65\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Tribal college and university research journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.51-5145\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tribal college and university research journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.51-5145","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

《美国高等教育》,2013年4月。普林斯顿:普林斯顿大学出版社。《美国的高等教育》对美国高等教育的体系、结构和相关问题进行了引人注目的全面概述。博克以直白和权威的风格,讨论了美国高等教育的性质和范围,并描述了一个包括社区学院、研究型大学和营利性机构等不同机构的系统的优势和潜在弱点。作者以科学探究的原则为模型,用以下关键问题来构建文本:*美国大学对新出现的问题和机遇的反应有多积极?*对美国高等教育机构活动的众多批评中,哪些是真正有效的,哪些是毫无根据或过分夸大的?*美国大学能做些什么来提高他们的表现,怎样才能最好地进行改革?(Bok Z013,第4页)在书的每个部分,Bok都提供了证据来支持或反驳与这些主要问题相关的主张。这些章节的范围很广,涵盖了高等教育的背景(例如,它的历史、目的和治理)以及本科和研究生教育的概念;专业教育;研究;和结论。博克指出,随着美国教育体系的发展,学院和大学已经将高等教育的三重使命编纂成法律,包括教学、研究和服务。最近,一些商学院将经济发展作为一项附带的机构目标。作者承认,学院和大学可以有多个和互补的目标,而且考虑到现代大学的复杂性,它们确实不可避免地要这样做(Kerr 1963)。然而,博克提醒高等教育的领导者们,不要采取那些分散了他们在实现学校既定使命和目标上的努力的举措。具体来说,他认为构成美国教育体系的各种机构是其最大的优势之一,因此建议各机构努力做好自己擅长的事情,而不是屈服于压力,成为自己不擅长的东西(例如,社区学院渴望成为四年制大学,四年制大学渴望成为综合性大学,等等)。尽管与维持一个分散的分布式系统相关的挑战,博克认为,定义学术界的价值观和规范是美国教育事业的核心优势。在机构类型中,这些价值和规范为定义责任、建立指导行为的原则、界定个人行为、设定相互期望和解决意见分歧提供了框架。在有说服力和可能引起争议的声明中,作者鼓励学院和大学领导人放弃所有其他人可以做得同样好或更好的活动,包括教学医院的所有权和为产生收入而设计的唯一目的的计划的激活。Bok指出,这些努力往往是昂贵和复杂的,并可能导致不可预见的后果,最终使机构失去信誉。此外,非必要的活动经常消耗教育领导者的时间和精力,但对加强机构的核心使命却收效甚微。博克尤其批评校际体育项目,他称之为“大学为了追求利润而牺牲学术标准的明目张胆的例子”(第351页)。事实上,考虑到目前的竞争状况,校际体育很容易被认为是与高等教育相对立的。然而,作者不情愿地承认,“放弃一项引人注目的运动的成本——从实际和政治角度来看——现在对于参与其中的大学来说太大了,无法考虑”(p. ...)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Higher Education in America
HIGHER EDUCATION IN AMERICA BOK, D. 2013. PRINCETON: PRINCETON UNIVERSITY PRESS. 479 PP.Reviewed by Matthew FifoltHigher Education in America is a compelling and comprehensive overview of the systems, structures, and relevant issues in higher education in the United States. Written in a straightforward and authoritative style, Bok discusses the nature and scope of u.s. higher education and describes the strengths and potential vulnerabilities of a system that encompasses such differing institutions as community colleges, research universities, and for-profit institutions.Modeling the principles of scientific inquiry, the author frames the text with the following key questions:* How vigorously are u.s. universities responding to their emerging problems and opportunities?* Which of the many criticisms of u.s. higher education institutions' activities are truly valid, and which are unfounded or highly exaggerated?* What can u.s. colleges do to improve their performance, and how can such reforms best be brought about? (Bok Z013, p. 4)In each section of the book, Bok provides evidence to support or refute claims relevant to these primary questions. The sections are broad in scope and cover the context of higher education (e.g, its history, purposes, and governance) as well as the concepts of undergraduate and graduate education; professional education; research; and conclusions.Bok notes that as the education system in the United States has evolved, colleges and universities have codified the tripartite mission of higher education to include teaching, research, and service. More recently, a number of schools have added economic development as an accompanying institutional aim. The author acknowledges that colleges and universities can have multiple and complementary goals and that it is, indeed, inevitable that they do given the complex nature of the modern multiversity (Kerr 1963).Yet Bok cautions higher education leaders against taking on initiatives that divert their efforts from achieving their institutions' established mission and goals. Specifically, he regards the variety of institutions that comprise the u.s. education system as one of its greatest strengths and therefore recommends that institutions strive to do what they do well rather than succumb to the pressure to become something they are not (e.g, community colleges aspiring to become four-year institutions, four-year institutions aspiring to become comprehensive institutions, etc.).Despite the challenges associated with maintaining a disparate and distributed system, Bok suggests that the values and norms that define the academic community are core strengths of the education enterprise in the United States. Across institutional type, these values and norms provide a framework for defining responsibilities, establishing principles that guide behavior, delimiting individual actions, setting mutual expectations, and resolving differences of opinion.In persuasive and potentially controversial statements, the author encourages college and university leaders to divest themselves of all activities that others could do as well or better, including ownership of teaching hospitals and activation of programs designed for the sole purpose of generating revenue. Bok notes that these endeavors are often costly and complicated and can lead to unforeseen consequences that ultimately discredit the institution. Further, non-essential activities frequently consume the time and energy of education leaders yet do little to strengthen the core mission of the institution.Bok is especially critical of intercollegiate athletics programs, which he calls "a flagrant example of universities sacrificing academic standards in the pursuit of profit" (p. 351). In fact, given the current state of competition, intercollegiate athletics could easily be considered antithetical to higher education. Yet the author reluctantly admits that "the cost of abandoning a high profile sport-in both practical and political terms-is now too great for the colleges involved to contemplate" (p. …
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Culture as Medicine for the Blackfeet Community: A pilot intervention. Demographics and the Demand for Higher Education Logistic modeling of university choice among student migrants to Karnataka for higher education Designing the New American University Educating a Diverse Nation: Lessons from Minority-Serving Institutions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1