已知的未知

Benjamin O. L. Bowles
{"title":"已知的未知","authors":"Benjamin O. L. Bowles","doi":"10.3167/jla.2018.020212","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Goldstein, D. M. (2012), Outlawed: Between Security and Rights in a Bolivian\nCity (Durham: Duke University Press), 344 pp., 9 photographs, 1 map,\nISBN: 978-0-8223-5311-9 (paperback).Daniel M. Goldstein’s Outlawed: Between Security and Rights in a Bolivian\nCity (2012) is a thickly described and richly detailed ethnography of\nuncertainty in the barrios of Cochabamba, Bolivia. It holds important\ninsights for legal anthropology, particularly where the sub-discipline\nintersects with the anthropology of the state and the anthropology of\nhuman rights. The ethnographic detail is exemplary, with the work here\nhaving serious implications for anthropological theory and opening up\nseveral avenues for further investigation. That it opens new debates more\nthan it offers cohesive answers – as is, admittedly, possibly fitting for the\n‘uncertain anthropology’ that Goldstein advocates – both is the prime\nstrength of the work and can be offered as a gentle critique. I consider\nthis to be because of the ambitious breadth of the work to the extent that\ndirections that were implied were ultimately left somewhat unexplored.\nThis review article is an attempt to consider the prime contributions of\nOutlawed and to tentatively map some of these implied connections.","PeriodicalId":34676,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Legal Anthropology","volume":"106 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Known Unknowns\",\"authors\":\"Benjamin O. L. Bowles\",\"doi\":\"10.3167/jla.2018.020212\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Goldstein, D. M. (2012), Outlawed: Between Security and Rights in a Bolivian\\nCity (Durham: Duke University Press), 344 pp., 9 photographs, 1 map,\\nISBN: 978-0-8223-5311-9 (paperback).Daniel M. Goldstein’s Outlawed: Between Security and Rights in a Bolivian\\nCity (2012) is a thickly described and richly detailed ethnography of\\nuncertainty in the barrios of Cochabamba, Bolivia. It holds important\\ninsights for legal anthropology, particularly where the sub-discipline\\nintersects with the anthropology of the state and the anthropology of\\nhuman rights. The ethnographic detail is exemplary, with the work here\\nhaving serious implications for anthropological theory and opening up\\nseveral avenues for further investigation. That it opens new debates more\\nthan it offers cohesive answers – as is, admittedly, possibly fitting for the\\n‘uncertain anthropology’ that Goldstein advocates – both is the prime\\nstrength of the work and can be offered as a gentle critique. I consider\\nthis to be because of the ambitious breadth of the work to the extent that\\ndirections that were implied were ultimately left somewhat unexplored.\\nThis review article is an attempt to consider the prime contributions of\\nOutlawed and to tentatively map some of these implied connections.\",\"PeriodicalId\":34676,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Legal Anthropology\",\"volume\":\"106 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Legal Anthropology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3167/jla.2018.020212\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Legal Anthropology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3167/jla.2018.020212","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

Goldstein, D. M.(2012),《非法:玻利维亚城市的安全与权利之间》(杜伦:杜克大学出版社),344页,9张照片,1幅地图,ISBN: 978-0-8223-5311-9(平装本)。丹尼尔·m·戈尔茨坦的《非法:玻利维亚城市的安全与权利之间》(2012)对玻利维亚科恰班巴地区的不确定性进行了详尽的描述和详细的民族志。它对法律人类学有着重要的见解,特别是在这个分支学科与国家人类学和人权人类学交叉的地方。人种学的细节是典型的,这里的工作对人类学理论有严重的影响,并为进一步的调查开辟了几个途径。它开启了新的争论,而不是提供了有凝聚力的答案——不可否认,这可能符合戈尔茨坦所倡导的“不确定的人类学”——这既是本书的主要力量,也是一种温和的批评。我认为这是因为作品的广度太大,以至于隐含的方向最终都没有被探索。这篇评论文章试图考虑《被取缔》的主要贡献,并试探性地描绘出其中一些隐含的联系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Known Unknowns
Goldstein, D. M. (2012), Outlawed: Between Security and Rights in a Bolivian City (Durham: Duke University Press), 344 pp., 9 photographs, 1 map, ISBN: 978-0-8223-5311-9 (paperback).Daniel M. Goldstein’s Outlawed: Between Security and Rights in a Bolivian City (2012) is a thickly described and richly detailed ethnography of uncertainty in the barrios of Cochabamba, Bolivia. It holds important insights for legal anthropology, particularly where the sub-discipline intersects with the anthropology of the state and the anthropology of human rights. The ethnographic detail is exemplary, with the work here having serious implications for anthropological theory and opening up several avenues for further investigation. That it opens new debates more than it offers cohesive answers – as is, admittedly, possibly fitting for the ‘uncertain anthropology’ that Goldstein advocates – both is the prime strength of the work and can be offered as a gentle critique. I consider this to be because of the ambitious breadth of the work to the extent that directions that were implied were ultimately left somewhat unexplored. This review article is an attempt to consider the prime contributions of Outlawed and to tentatively map some of these implied connections.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Concorde's Tyres Reckoning with Law—and with Legal Anthropology Durable Resolutions Indigenous Peoples and Criminal Justice Legal aid amid bureaucracy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1