{"title":"已知的未知","authors":"Benjamin O. L. Bowles","doi":"10.3167/jla.2018.020212","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Goldstein, D. M. (2012), Outlawed: Between Security and Rights in a Bolivian\nCity (Durham: Duke University Press), 344 pp., 9 photographs, 1 map,\nISBN: 978-0-8223-5311-9 (paperback).Daniel M. Goldstein’s Outlawed: Between Security and Rights in a Bolivian\nCity (2012) is a thickly described and richly detailed ethnography of\nuncertainty in the barrios of Cochabamba, Bolivia. It holds important\ninsights for legal anthropology, particularly where the sub-discipline\nintersects with the anthropology of the state and the anthropology of\nhuman rights. The ethnographic detail is exemplary, with the work here\nhaving serious implications for anthropological theory and opening up\nseveral avenues for further investigation. That it opens new debates more\nthan it offers cohesive answers – as is, admittedly, possibly fitting for the\n‘uncertain anthropology’ that Goldstein advocates – both is the prime\nstrength of the work and can be offered as a gentle critique. I consider\nthis to be because of the ambitious breadth of the work to the extent that\ndirections that were implied were ultimately left somewhat unexplored.\nThis review article is an attempt to consider the prime contributions of\nOutlawed and to tentatively map some of these implied connections.","PeriodicalId":34676,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Legal Anthropology","volume":"106 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Known Unknowns\",\"authors\":\"Benjamin O. L. Bowles\",\"doi\":\"10.3167/jla.2018.020212\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Goldstein, D. M. (2012), Outlawed: Between Security and Rights in a Bolivian\\nCity (Durham: Duke University Press), 344 pp., 9 photographs, 1 map,\\nISBN: 978-0-8223-5311-9 (paperback).Daniel M. Goldstein’s Outlawed: Between Security and Rights in a Bolivian\\nCity (2012) is a thickly described and richly detailed ethnography of\\nuncertainty in the barrios of Cochabamba, Bolivia. It holds important\\ninsights for legal anthropology, particularly where the sub-discipline\\nintersects with the anthropology of the state and the anthropology of\\nhuman rights. The ethnographic detail is exemplary, with the work here\\nhaving serious implications for anthropological theory and opening up\\nseveral avenues for further investigation. That it opens new debates more\\nthan it offers cohesive answers – as is, admittedly, possibly fitting for the\\n‘uncertain anthropology’ that Goldstein advocates – both is the prime\\nstrength of the work and can be offered as a gentle critique. I consider\\nthis to be because of the ambitious breadth of the work to the extent that\\ndirections that were implied were ultimately left somewhat unexplored.\\nThis review article is an attempt to consider the prime contributions of\\nOutlawed and to tentatively map some of these implied connections.\",\"PeriodicalId\":34676,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Legal Anthropology\",\"volume\":\"106 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Legal Anthropology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3167/jla.2018.020212\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Legal Anthropology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3167/jla.2018.020212","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
Goldstein, D. M.(2012),《非法:玻利维亚城市的安全与权利之间》(杜伦:杜克大学出版社),344页,9张照片,1幅地图,ISBN: 978-0-8223-5311-9(平装本)。丹尼尔·m·戈尔茨坦的《非法:玻利维亚城市的安全与权利之间》(2012)对玻利维亚科恰班巴地区的不确定性进行了详尽的描述和详细的民族志。它对法律人类学有着重要的见解,特别是在这个分支学科与国家人类学和人权人类学交叉的地方。人种学的细节是典型的,这里的工作对人类学理论有严重的影响,并为进一步的调查开辟了几个途径。它开启了新的争论,而不是提供了有凝聚力的答案——不可否认,这可能符合戈尔茨坦所倡导的“不确定的人类学”——这既是本书的主要力量,也是一种温和的批评。我认为这是因为作品的广度太大,以至于隐含的方向最终都没有被探索。这篇评论文章试图考虑《被取缔》的主要贡献,并试探性地描绘出其中一些隐含的联系。
Goldstein, D. M. (2012), Outlawed: Between Security and Rights in a Bolivian
City (Durham: Duke University Press), 344 pp., 9 photographs, 1 map,
ISBN: 978-0-8223-5311-9 (paperback).Daniel M. Goldstein’s Outlawed: Between Security and Rights in a Bolivian
City (2012) is a thickly described and richly detailed ethnography of
uncertainty in the barrios of Cochabamba, Bolivia. It holds important
insights for legal anthropology, particularly where the sub-discipline
intersects with the anthropology of the state and the anthropology of
human rights. The ethnographic detail is exemplary, with the work here
having serious implications for anthropological theory and opening up
several avenues for further investigation. That it opens new debates more
than it offers cohesive answers – as is, admittedly, possibly fitting for the
‘uncertain anthropology’ that Goldstein advocates – both is the prime
strength of the work and can be offered as a gentle critique. I consider
this to be because of the ambitious breadth of the work to the extent that
directions that were implied were ultimately left somewhat unexplored.
This review article is an attempt to consider the prime contributions of
Outlawed and to tentatively map some of these implied connections.