质量改进的调试。

Quality in primary care Pub Date : 2022-01-11 DOI:10.1201/9780429084041-6

S. Gillam, A. Siriwardena

{"title":"质量改进的调试。","authors":"S. Gillam, A. Siriwardena","doi":"10.1201/9780429084041-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This is the fifth in a series of articles about the science of quality improvement. We examine the nature of healthcare commissioning and its role as a driver for quality improvement. We draw on evidence from previous forms of primary-care-led commissioning (PCLC) and consider how the quality of care might be improved through the processes of commissioning.","PeriodicalId":88096,"journal":{"name":"Quality in primary care","volume":"30 1","pages":"339-43"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Commissioning for quality improvement.\",\"authors\":\"S. Gillam, A. Siriwardena\",\"doi\":\"10.1201/9780429084041-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This is the fifth in a series of articles about the science of quality improvement. We examine the nature of healthcare commissioning and its role as a driver for quality improvement. We draw on evidence from previous forms of primary-care-led commissioning (PCLC) and consider how the quality of care might be improved through the processes of commissioning.\",\"PeriodicalId\":88096,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Quality in primary care\",\"volume\":\"30 1\",\"pages\":\"339-43\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Quality in primary care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1201/9780429084041-6\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quality in primary care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1201/9780429084041-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 9

摘要

这是关于质量改进科学系列文章的第五篇。我们研究了医疗保健委托的性质及其作为质量改进的驱动因素的作用。我们从以前的初级保健主导的委托(PCLC)形式的证据，并考虑如何护理质量可能通过委托的过程得到改善。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

Commissioning for quality improvement.

This is the fifth in a series of articles about the science of quality improvement. We examine the nature of healthcare commissioning and its role as a driver for quality improvement. We draw on evidence from previous forms of primary-care-led commissioning (PCLC) and consider how the quality of care might be improved through the processes of commissioning.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Quality in primary care

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊最新文献

Evaluating improvement. Understanding processes and how to improve them. Commissioning for quality improvement. The Impact 0f Pandemic Ebola Virus 0n Global Public Health Preterm birth and factors: An institution based cross-sectional study in case of southern Ethiopia