评估通信网络中拥塞崩溃的预测因子

Christopher E. Dabrowski, K. Mills
{"title":"评估通信网络中拥塞崩溃的预测因子","authors":"Christopher E. Dabrowski, K. Mills","doi":"10.1109/NOMS.2018.8406225","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Congestion in communication networks can be modeled as a percolation process, where congestion spreads minimally before a critical load and expands rapidly afterwards. Some studies identify predict onset of rapidly expanding congestion in time to alert network managers to take mitigating actions to avoid congestion collapse. The paper specifies five predictors: autocorrelation, variance, threshold, growth persistence, and growth rate. Predictor performance is measured for three simulated network models, under two traffic scenarios: increasing and steady load. Predictors are compared on implementation cost, accuracy, warning time, and persistence. The rates and types of prediction errors are also characterized. Results showed that: (1) predictor performance is influenced by network-model realism; (2) the autocorrelation and variance predictors performed poorly in some situations; (3) the threshold predictor yielded best overall accuracy, with mean warning time exceeding seven minutes for the most realistic network model. The paper also suggests a necessary condition to control false positives.","PeriodicalId":19331,"journal":{"name":"NOMS 2018 - 2018 IEEE/IFIP Network Operations and Management Symposium","volume":"16 3 1","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating predictors of congestion collapse in communication networks\",\"authors\":\"Christopher E. Dabrowski, K. Mills\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/NOMS.2018.8406225\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Congestion in communication networks can be modeled as a percolation process, where congestion spreads minimally before a critical load and expands rapidly afterwards. Some studies identify predict onset of rapidly expanding congestion in time to alert network managers to take mitigating actions to avoid congestion collapse. The paper specifies five predictors: autocorrelation, variance, threshold, growth persistence, and growth rate. Predictor performance is measured for three simulated network models, under two traffic scenarios: increasing and steady load. Predictors are compared on implementation cost, accuracy, warning time, and persistence. The rates and types of prediction errors are also characterized. Results showed that: (1) predictor performance is influenced by network-model realism; (2) the autocorrelation and variance predictors performed poorly in some situations; (3) the threshold predictor yielded best overall accuracy, with mean warning time exceeding seven minutes for the most realistic network model. The paper also suggests a necessary condition to control false positives.\",\"PeriodicalId\":19331,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"NOMS 2018 - 2018 IEEE/IFIP Network Operations and Management Symposium\",\"volume\":\"16 3 1\",\"pages\":\"1-9\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-04-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"NOMS 2018 - 2018 IEEE/IFIP Network Operations and Management Symposium\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/NOMS.2018.8406225\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NOMS 2018 - 2018 IEEE/IFIP Network Operations and Management Symposium","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/NOMS.2018.8406225","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

通信网络中的拥塞可以建模为一个渗透过程,其中拥塞在临界负载之前传播最小,然后迅速扩展。一些研究及时确定了预测迅速扩大的拥塞的开始,以提醒网络管理人员采取缓解措施以避免拥塞崩溃。本文指定了五个预测指标:自相关、方差、阈值、增长持续性和增长率。在负载增长和稳定两种情况下,对三种模拟网络模型的预测器性能进行了测试。在实现成本、准确性、警告时间和持久性方面对预测器进行比较。预测误差的比率和类型也被描述。结果表明:(1)网络模型真实性对预测器的性能有显著影响;(2)自相关和方差预测因子在某些情况下表现较差;(3)阈值预测器的总体准确率最好,对于最现实的网络模型,平均预警时间超过7分钟。文中还提出了控制误报的必要条件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Evaluating predictors of congestion collapse in communication networks
Congestion in communication networks can be modeled as a percolation process, where congestion spreads minimally before a critical load and expands rapidly afterwards. Some studies identify predict onset of rapidly expanding congestion in time to alert network managers to take mitigating actions to avoid congestion collapse. The paper specifies five predictors: autocorrelation, variance, threshold, growth persistence, and growth rate. Predictor performance is measured for three simulated network models, under two traffic scenarios: increasing and steady load. Predictors are compared on implementation cost, accuracy, warning time, and persistence. The rates and types of prediction errors are also characterized. Results showed that: (1) predictor performance is influenced by network-model realism; (2) the autocorrelation and variance predictors performed poorly in some situations; (3) the threshold predictor yielded best overall accuracy, with mean warning time exceeding seven minutes for the most realistic network model. The paper also suggests a necessary condition to control false positives.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
SSH Kernel: A Jupyter Extension Specifically for Remote Infrastructure Administration Visual emulation for Ethereum's virtual machine Analyzing throughput and stability in cellular networks Network events in a large commercial network: What can we learn? Economic incentives on DNSSEC deployment: Time to move from quantity to quality
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1