P. Geoffroy, E. Curis, C. Courtin, J. Moreira, Thomas Morvillers, B. Étain, J. Laplanche, F. Bellivier, C. Marie-Claire
{"title":"锂在双相情感障碍中的反应和核心时钟基因的表达","authors":"P. Geoffroy, E. Curis, C. Courtin, J. Moreira, Thomas Morvillers, B. Étain, J. Laplanche, F. Bellivier, C. Marie-Claire","doi":"10.1080/15622975.2017.1282174","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Objectives: We examine whether the lithium response is associated with changes in the expression of core clock genes. Methods: The effect of a therapeutic concentration of lithium (1 mM) on the expression levels of 17 circadian genes was examined in lymphoblastoid cell lines (LCLs) derived from two well-characterized groups of bipolar disorder patients, defined as lithium non-responders (NR, n = 20) or excellent responders (ER, n = 16). Quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) was conducted at 2, 4 and 8 days (d2, d4 and d8) with and without lithium exposure. Results: At d2, in ER only, BHLHE41, RORA, PER1, ARNTL, CRY2, BHLHE40 and CSNK1D were upregulated, whereas NR1D1 was downregulated. At d4, in ER only, CRY1 was downregulated. At d8, in NR only, GSK3β was upregulated and DBP, TIMELESS and CRY1 were downregulated. Significant Group × Lithium interactions existed for NR1D1 at d2 (P = 0.02), and CRY1 at d4 (P = 0.02). Longitudinal analyses showed differential temporal evolutions between NR and ER (significant Time × Group interaction) for PER3, NR1D1, DBP, RORA, CSNK1D and TIMELESS; and a significant Time × Lithium interaction for NR1D1. Coexpression data analyses suggested distinct groups of circadian genes concurrently modulated by lithium. Conclusions: In LCLs, lithium influences expression of circadian genes with differences in amplitude and kinetics according to the patient’s lithium response status.","PeriodicalId":22963,"journal":{"name":"The World Journal of Biological Psychiatry","volume":"7 1","pages":"619 - 632"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"51","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Lithium response in bipolar disorders and core clock genes expression\",\"authors\":\"P. Geoffroy, E. Curis, C. Courtin, J. Moreira, Thomas Morvillers, B. Étain, J. Laplanche, F. Bellivier, C. Marie-Claire\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/15622975.2017.1282174\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Objectives: We examine whether the lithium response is associated with changes in the expression of core clock genes. Methods: The effect of a therapeutic concentration of lithium (1 mM) on the expression levels of 17 circadian genes was examined in lymphoblastoid cell lines (LCLs) derived from two well-characterized groups of bipolar disorder patients, defined as lithium non-responders (NR, n = 20) or excellent responders (ER, n = 16). Quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) was conducted at 2, 4 and 8 days (d2, d4 and d8) with and without lithium exposure. Results: At d2, in ER only, BHLHE41, RORA, PER1, ARNTL, CRY2, BHLHE40 and CSNK1D were upregulated, whereas NR1D1 was downregulated. At d4, in ER only, CRY1 was downregulated. At d8, in NR only, GSK3β was upregulated and DBP, TIMELESS and CRY1 were downregulated. Significant Group × Lithium interactions existed for NR1D1 at d2 (P = 0.02), and CRY1 at d4 (P = 0.02). Longitudinal analyses showed differential temporal evolutions between NR and ER (significant Time × Group interaction) for PER3, NR1D1, DBP, RORA, CSNK1D and TIMELESS; and a significant Time × Lithium interaction for NR1D1. Coexpression data analyses suggested distinct groups of circadian genes concurrently modulated by lithium. Conclusions: In LCLs, lithium influences expression of circadian genes with differences in amplitude and kinetics according to the patient’s lithium response status.\",\"PeriodicalId\":22963,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The World Journal of Biological Psychiatry\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"619 - 632\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-11-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"51\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The World Journal of Biological Psychiatry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/15622975.2017.1282174\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The World Journal of Biological Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15622975.2017.1282174","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 51
摘要
目的:我们研究锂反应是否与核心时钟基因的表达变化有关。方法:研究了锂治疗浓度(1mm)对来自两组特征明确的双相情感障碍患者的淋巴母细胞样细胞系(LCLs)中17个昼夜节律基因表达水平的影响,这两组患者被定义为锂无反应(NR, n = 20)或良好反应(ER, n = 16)。在有和没有锂暴露的情况下,分别在第2、4和8天(d2、d4和d8)进行实时荧光定量PCR (qRT-PCR)检测。结果:d2时,仅ER组BHLHE41、RORA、PER1、ARNTL、CRY2、BHLHE40和CSNK1D上调,NR1D1下调。在第4天,仅在ER中,CRY1下调。d8时,仅在NR中,GSK3β上调,DBP、TIMELESS和CRY1下调。NR1D1在d2时(P = 0.02), CRY1在d4时(P = 0.02)存在显著的组与锂相互作用。纵向分析显示,PER3、NR1D1、DBP、RORA、CSNK1D和TIMELESS在时间上与ER存在差异(显著的时间×组交互作用);NR1D1具有显著的时间与锂相互作用。共表达数据分析表明,锂同时调节了不同的昼夜节律基因群。结论:在LCLs中,锂会影响昼夜节律基因的表达,并根据患者的锂反应状态在幅度和动力学上存在差异。
Lithium response in bipolar disorders and core clock genes expression
Abstract Objectives: We examine whether the lithium response is associated with changes in the expression of core clock genes. Methods: The effect of a therapeutic concentration of lithium (1 mM) on the expression levels of 17 circadian genes was examined in lymphoblastoid cell lines (LCLs) derived from two well-characterized groups of bipolar disorder patients, defined as lithium non-responders (NR, n = 20) or excellent responders (ER, n = 16). Quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) was conducted at 2, 4 and 8 days (d2, d4 and d8) with and without lithium exposure. Results: At d2, in ER only, BHLHE41, RORA, PER1, ARNTL, CRY2, BHLHE40 and CSNK1D were upregulated, whereas NR1D1 was downregulated. At d4, in ER only, CRY1 was downregulated. At d8, in NR only, GSK3β was upregulated and DBP, TIMELESS and CRY1 were downregulated. Significant Group × Lithium interactions existed for NR1D1 at d2 (P = 0.02), and CRY1 at d4 (P = 0.02). Longitudinal analyses showed differential temporal evolutions between NR and ER (significant Time × Group interaction) for PER3, NR1D1, DBP, RORA, CSNK1D and TIMELESS; and a significant Time × Lithium interaction for NR1D1. Coexpression data analyses suggested distinct groups of circadian genes concurrently modulated by lithium. Conclusions: In LCLs, lithium influences expression of circadian genes with differences in amplitude and kinetics according to the patient’s lithium response status.