但丁的基督教与哲学:对保罗·斯特恩《但丁的哲学生活》的批判回应

Q4 Arts and Humanities Scripta Mediaevalia Pub Date : 2021-04-28 DOI:10.1353/mdi.2021.0005
Marco Andreacchio
{"title":"但丁的基督教与哲学:对保罗·斯特恩《但丁的哲学生活》的批判回应","authors":"Marco Andreacchio","doi":"10.1353/mdi.2021.0005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:Paul Stern's recent volume on Dante as advocate of a postmetaphysical politics stands at the forefront of a contemporary academic trend to de-theologize Dante, which is to say, to depict his teachings along the lines of radical historical immanentism, as if Dante were a precursor of modernity's severing of human nature from divine transcendence. While critiquing Stern's readings of both Catholic theology and Dante's poetry, the present article exemplifies a novel approach to the Florentine's work, reexamining how it helps us deepen our appreciation of the relation between Christianity and philosophy. Stern's challenge to theological readings of Dante leaves the door open to a reconciliation of the Florentine with medieval Church doctrine on irreducibly dialectical grounds. Rather than pointing to philosophical poetry's instrumentalizing of theology, as Stern teaches, the irreducibility of Dante's poetics to revealed theology invites awareness of philosophy's original presence at theology's sacred heart.","PeriodicalId":36685,"journal":{"name":"Scripta Mediaevalia","volume":"9 1","pages":"143 - 186"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Christianity and Philosophy in Dante: A Critical Response to Paul Stern, Dante's Philosophical Life\",\"authors\":\"Marco Andreacchio\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/mdi.2021.0005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract:Paul Stern's recent volume on Dante as advocate of a postmetaphysical politics stands at the forefront of a contemporary academic trend to de-theologize Dante, which is to say, to depict his teachings along the lines of radical historical immanentism, as if Dante were a precursor of modernity's severing of human nature from divine transcendence. While critiquing Stern's readings of both Catholic theology and Dante's poetry, the present article exemplifies a novel approach to the Florentine's work, reexamining how it helps us deepen our appreciation of the relation between Christianity and philosophy. Stern's challenge to theological readings of Dante leaves the door open to a reconciliation of the Florentine with medieval Church doctrine on irreducibly dialectical grounds. Rather than pointing to philosophical poetry's instrumentalizing of theology, as Stern teaches, the irreducibility of Dante's poetics to revealed theology invites awareness of philosophy's original presence at theology's sacred heart.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36685,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scripta Mediaevalia\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"143 - 186\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-04-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scripta Mediaevalia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/mdi.2021.0005\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scripta Mediaevalia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/mdi.2021.0005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:保罗·斯特恩(Paul Stern)最近出版的关于但丁的著作《后形而上学政治》(postmetaphysical politics)站在当代学术潮流的前沿,将但丁去神学化,也就是说,沿着激进的历史内在主义的路线描绘但丁的教义,仿佛但丁是现代性将人性与神性超越分离开来的先驱。在评论斯特恩对天主教神学和但丁诗歌的阅读时,本文举例说明了一种新的方法来研究佛罗伦萨人的工作,重新审视它如何帮助我们加深对基督教与哲学之间关系的欣赏。斯特恩对但丁神学解读的挑战,为佛罗伦萨与中世纪教会教义在不可简化的辩证基础上的和解打开了大门。而不是指出哲学诗歌对神学的工具化,正如斯特恩所教导的那样,但丁的诗学对启示神学的不可约性让人们意识到哲学在神学神圣中心的原始存在。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Christianity and Philosophy in Dante: A Critical Response to Paul Stern, Dante's Philosophical Life
Abstract:Paul Stern's recent volume on Dante as advocate of a postmetaphysical politics stands at the forefront of a contemporary academic trend to de-theologize Dante, which is to say, to depict his teachings along the lines of radical historical immanentism, as if Dante were a precursor of modernity's severing of human nature from divine transcendence. While critiquing Stern's readings of both Catholic theology and Dante's poetry, the present article exemplifies a novel approach to the Florentine's work, reexamining how it helps us deepen our appreciation of the relation between Christianity and philosophy. Stern's challenge to theological readings of Dante leaves the door open to a reconciliation of the Florentine with medieval Church doctrine on irreducibly dialectical grounds. Rather than pointing to philosophical poetry's instrumentalizing of theology, as Stern teaches, the irreducibility of Dante's poetics to revealed theology invites awareness of philosophy's original presence at theology's sacred heart.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Scripta Mediaevalia
Scripta Mediaevalia Arts and Humanities-Philosophy
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
期刊最新文献
Introduction: Medieval Unfreedoms in a Global Context The Elbian Region as Predatory Landscape, 900–1200 CE: Enslavement, Slaughter, and Settler Colonialism Were Concubines "Anti-Wives"? Revisiting the Biographical Narratives of Maria the Copt in Kitāb al-Ṭabaqāt al-Kubra and ʻInān in Kitāb al-Aghānī al-Kabīr Servile Concubinage in Eleventh- and Twelfth-Century Bavaria Performative Subjugation and the Invention of Race: The Danzas de Judios y Moros, Festivals, and Ceremonies in Late Medieval Iberia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1