非洲土地所有权

John Hunter, Carl Mabbs-Zeno
{"title":"非洲土地所有权","authors":"John Hunter,&nbsp;Carl Mabbs-Zeno","doi":"10.1016/0309-586X(86)90034-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Foreign advisors and donor agencies often recommend change in land tenure as an important component of African rural development. These recommendations are founded on experience in developed nations as interpreted both by capitalist and by socialist paradigms. The considerable African experience with land reform displays fundamental divergence from these paradigms, resulting both from the unique institutional composition existing in Africa and from the present relationship of Africa to the rest of the world. Tenure systems have shown greater flexibility than is generally acknowledged, suggesting that efforts to strengthen agricultural performance should not focus on these systems as a constraint to development.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100059,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural Administration","volume":"23 2","pages":"Pages 109-122"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1986-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0309-586X(86)90034-8","citationCount":"19","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"African land tenure\",\"authors\":\"John Hunter,&nbsp;Carl Mabbs-Zeno\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/0309-586X(86)90034-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Foreign advisors and donor agencies often recommend change in land tenure as an important component of African rural development. These recommendations are founded on experience in developed nations as interpreted both by capitalist and by socialist paradigms. The considerable African experience with land reform displays fundamental divergence from these paradigms, resulting both from the unique institutional composition existing in Africa and from the present relationship of Africa to the rest of the world. Tenure systems have shown greater flexibility than is generally acknowledged, suggesting that efforts to strengthen agricultural performance should not focus on these systems as a constraint to development.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100059,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Agricultural Administration\",\"volume\":\"23 2\",\"pages\":\"Pages 109-122\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1986-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0309-586X(86)90034-8\",\"citationCount\":\"19\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Agricultural Administration\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0309586X86900348\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agricultural Administration","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0309586X86900348","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 19

摘要

外国顾问和捐助机构经常建议改变土地保有制度,作为非洲农村发展的一个重要组成部分。这些建议是建立在发达国家的经验基础上的,并被资本主义和社会主义范式所解释。非洲在土地改革方面的大量经验显示出与这些范例的根本分歧,这是由于非洲现有的独特体制组成和非洲目前与世界其他地区的关系造成的。权属制度显示出比一般承认的更大的灵活性,这表明加强农业绩效的努力不应把重点放在这些制度上,将其作为发展的制约因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
African land tenure

Foreign advisors and donor agencies often recommend change in land tenure as an important component of African rural development. These recommendations are founded on experience in developed nations as interpreted both by capitalist and by socialist paradigms. The considerable African experience with land reform displays fundamental divergence from these paradigms, resulting both from the unique institutional composition existing in Africa and from the present relationship of Africa to the rest of the world. Tenure systems have shown greater flexibility than is generally acknowledged, suggesting that efforts to strengthen agricultural performance should not focus on these systems as a constraint to development.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Editorial Board Editorial Board Recurrent costs in agricultural development The EEC and the food industries
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1