{"title":"探究《植物保护条例》的科学依据","authors":"Rhoda Jennings","doi":"10.1177/14614529221103341","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The appeal taken by Bayer CropScience AG in Bayer CropScience AG v European Commission 1 probes the precautionary decision-making procedure employed in the regulation of pesticides in the European Union. Scientific data has a central role in the procedure. The decision of the Court of Justice suggests that an expansive approach to the source and type of scientific data is appropriate. Such a broad approach, however, can result in uncertainty with regards to the data to be relied upon and also raises questions over how such broad parameters can be translated into a practical and applied methodology to pesticide management.","PeriodicalId":52213,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Law Review","volume":"62 6 1","pages":"191 - 200"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Probing the scientific evidence base of the Plant Protection Regulation\",\"authors\":\"Rhoda Jennings\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/14614529221103341\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The appeal taken by Bayer CropScience AG in Bayer CropScience AG v European Commission 1 probes the precautionary decision-making procedure employed in the regulation of pesticides in the European Union. Scientific data has a central role in the procedure. The decision of the Court of Justice suggests that an expansive approach to the source and type of scientific data is appropriate. Such a broad approach, however, can result in uncertainty with regards to the data to be relied upon and also raises questions over how such broad parameters can be translated into a practical and applied methodology to pesticide management.\",\"PeriodicalId\":52213,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental Law Review\",\"volume\":\"62 6 1\",\"pages\":\"191 - 200\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental Law Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/14614529221103341\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14614529221103341","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
Probing the scientific evidence base of the Plant Protection Regulation
The appeal taken by Bayer CropScience AG in Bayer CropScience AG v European Commission 1 probes the precautionary decision-making procedure employed in the regulation of pesticides in the European Union. Scientific data has a central role in the procedure. The decision of the Court of Justice suggests that an expansive approach to the source and type of scientific data is appropriate. Such a broad approach, however, can result in uncertainty with regards to the data to be relied upon and also raises questions over how such broad parameters can be translated into a practical and applied methodology to pesticide management.