小股东保护:英国衍生诉讼规则与孟加拉公司法

Q4 Social Sciences International Journal of Private Law Pub Date : 2014-03-31 DOI:10.1504/IJPL.2014.060086
Kazi Mokhles Uddin Ahamed
{"title":"小股东保护:英国衍生诉讼规则与孟加拉公司法","authors":"Kazi Mokhles Uddin Ahamed","doi":"10.1504/IJPL.2014.060086","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The fundamental concept of the minority shareholder protection is the distinction between the personal rights of the shareholders and the rights of the company. A shareholder may have personal rights under an agreement to which he is a party in his personal capacity under the constitution of the company, may be protected by the course of personal action. However, if shareholder desires to enforce a right of the company not confer on him can only do so by means of the derivative claims. The most common form of derivative claim is the company’s property fraudulently misappropriate by the directors. The derivative claim is a claim brought by an individual shareholder in his own name, but on behalf of the company. The reason the claim takes this form is that the minority shareholder is not in a position to see the claim is brought in the name of the company itself to enforce the company’s rights. This paper examines the protection of the minority shareholders’ rights with reference to English rule of the derivative claim. This paper also concentrates on the current statutory position of Bangladesh in relation to minority shareholders’ protection and distinguishes it from the English rule.","PeriodicalId":39023,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Private Law","volume":"6 1","pages":"129"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The minority shareholder protection: the English rule of derivative action and Companies Act of Bangladesh\",\"authors\":\"Kazi Mokhles Uddin Ahamed\",\"doi\":\"10.1504/IJPL.2014.060086\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The fundamental concept of the minority shareholder protection is the distinction between the personal rights of the shareholders and the rights of the company. A shareholder may have personal rights under an agreement to which he is a party in his personal capacity under the constitution of the company, may be protected by the course of personal action. However, if shareholder desires to enforce a right of the company not confer on him can only do so by means of the derivative claims. The most common form of derivative claim is the company’s property fraudulently misappropriate by the directors. The derivative claim is a claim brought by an individual shareholder in his own name, but on behalf of the company. The reason the claim takes this form is that the minority shareholder is not in a position to see the claim is brought in the name of the company itself to enforce the company’s rights. This paper examines the protection of the minority shareholders’ rights with reference to English rule of the derivative claim. This paper also concentrates on the current statutory position of Bangladesh in relation to minority shareholders’ protection and distinguishes it from the English rule.\",\"PeriodicalId\":39023,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Private Law\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"129\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-03-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Private Law\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1504/IJPL.2014.060086\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Private Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1504/IJPL.2014.060086","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

中小股东保护的基本理念是区分股东个人权利与公司权利。股东可以根据公司章程以个人身份参与的协议享有个人权利,也可以受个人诉讼程序的保护。但是,如果股东希望执行公司未授予他的权利,则只能通过派生债权来实现。派生索赔最常见的形式是公司财产被董事欺诈性挪用。衍生债权是由个人股东以自己的名义,代表公司提出的债权。索赔采取这种形式的原因是,小股东无法看到索赔以公司本身的名义提出,以执行公司的权利。本文借鉴英国衍生请求权规则对我国中小股东权利的保护进行了探讨。本文还集中讨论了孟加拉国目前在保护少数股东方面的法定地位,并将其与英国规则进行了区分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The minority shareholder protection: the English rule of derivative action and Companies Act of Bangladesh
The fundamental concept of the minority shareholder protection is the distinction between the personal rights of the shareholders and the rights of the company. A shareholder may have personal rights under an agreement to which he is a party in his personal capacity under the constitution of the company, may be protected by the course of personal action. However, if shareholder desires to enforce a right of the company not confer on him can only do so by means of the derivative claims. The most common form of derivative claim is the company’s property fraudulently misappropriate by the directors. The derivative claim is a claim brought by an individual shareholder in his own name, but on behalf of the company. The reason the claim takes this form is that the minority shareholder is not in a position to see the claim is brought in the name of the company itself to enforce the company’s rights. This paper examines the protection of the minority shareholders’ rights with reference to English rule of the derivative claim. This paper also concentrates on the current statutory position of Bangladesh in relation to minority shareholders’ protection and distinguishes it from the English rule.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
期刊最新文献
The evolution of the non-oral modification clause Legal regulation of migration policy in EU countries: current challenges The application of the concept of consideration to smart contracts on a blockchain. The propriety of mandatory arbitration in Nigeria vis-à-vis the doctrine of voluntariness: the imperativeness of charting a new course The evolution of the non-oral modification clause
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1