{"title":"较短疗程的抗生素是否足以治疗COPD加重?","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.rmedu.2008.08.014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>A study was undertaken to determine whether a short course of antibiotic treatment (< or=5 days) is as effective as the conventional longer treatment in acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane central register of controlled trials were searched to July 2006. Studies considered eligible were double-blind randomised clinical trials including adult patients > or=18 years of age with a clinical diagnosis of exacerbation of COPD or chronic bronchitis, no antimicrobial therapy at the time of diagnosis and random assignment to antibiotic treatment for<or=5 days versus >5 days. The primary outcome measure was clinical cure at early follow-up on an intention-to-treat basis.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Twenty-one studies with a total of 10,698 patients were included. The average quality of the studies was high: the mean (SD) Jadad score was 3.9 (0.9). At early follow-up (< 25 days), the summary odds ratio (OR) for clinical cure with short treatment versus conventional treatment was 0.99 (95% CI 0.90–1.08). At late follow-up the summary OR was 1.0 (95% CI 0.91–1.10) and the summary OR for bacteriological cure was 1.05 (95% CI 0.87–1.26). Similar summary ORs were observed for early cure in trials with the same antibiotic in both arms and in studies grouped by the antibiotic class used in the short-course arm.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>A short course of antibiotic treatment is as effective as the traditional longer treatment in patients with mild to moderate exacerbations of chronic bronchitis and COPD.</p><p>Reproduced with permission from the BMJ Publishing Group.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101083,"journal":{"name":"Respiratory Medicine: COPD Update","volume":"4 4","pages":"Page 140"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.rmedu.2008.08.014","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Are shorter courses of antibiotics adequate in exacerbations of COPD?\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.rmedu.2008.08.014\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>A study was undertaken to determine whether a short course of antibiotic treatment (< or=5 days) is as effective as the conventional longer treatment in acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane central register of controlled trials were searched to July 2006. Studies considered eligible were double-blind randomised clinical trials including adult patients > or=18 years of age with a clinical diagnosis of exacerbation of COPD or chronic bronchitis, no antimicrobial therapy at the time of diagnosis and random assignment to antibiotic treatment for<or=5 days versus >5 days. The primary outcome measure was clinical cure at early follow-up on an intention-to-treat basis.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Twenty-one studies with a total of 10,698 patients were included. The average quality of the studies was high: the mean (SD) Jadad score was 3.9 (0.9). At early follow-up (< 25 days), the summary odds ratio (OR) for clinical cure with short treatment versus conventional treatment was 0.99 (95% CI 0.90–1.08). At late follow-up the summary OR was 1.0 (95% CI 0.91–1.10) and the summary OR for bacteriological cure was 1.05 (95% CI 0.87–1.26). Similar summary ORs were observed for early cure in trials with the same antibiotic in both arms and in studies grouped by the antibiotic class used in the short-course arm.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>A short course of antibiotic treatment is as effective as the traditional longer treatment in patients with mild to moderate exacerbations of chronic bronchitis and COPD.</p><p>Reproduced with permission from the BMJ Publishing Group.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101083,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Respiratory Medicine: COPD Update\",\"volume\":\"4 4\",\"pages\":\"Page 140\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2008-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.rmedu.2008.08.014\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Respiratory Medicine: COPD Update\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1745045408000932\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Respiratory Medicine: COPD Update","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1745045408000932","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
进行了一项研究,以确定短期抗生素治疗(<(=5天)在慢性支气管炎和慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)急性加重期与常规较长时间治疗同样有效。方法检索截至2006年7月的medline、EMBASE和Cochrane对照试验中心注册库。被认为符合条件的研究是双盲随机临床试验,包括成人患者>年龄≥18岁,临床诊断为COPD或慢性支气管炎加重,诊断时未接受抗微生物治疗,随机分配抗生素治疗时间≥5天vs≥5天。主要结局指标是在意向治疗基础上的早期随访临床治愈。结果纳入21项研究,共10698例患者。研究的平均质量较高:平均(SD) Jadad评分为3.9(0.9)。在早期随访中(<25天),短期治疗与常规治疗临床治愈的总优势比(OR)为0.99 (95% CI 0.90-1.08)。在随访后期,总OR为1.0 (95% CI 0.91-1.10),细菌治愈的总OR为1.05 (95% CI 0.87-1.26)。在两组使用相同抗生素的试验中,以及在短期组使用抗生素类别分组的研究中,观察到类似的总结or。结论对慢性支气管炎和慢性阻塞性肺病轻中度加重患者,短疗程抗生素治疗与传统长疗程抗生素治疗效果相同。经英国医学杂志出版集团许可转载。
Are shorter courses of antibiotics adequate in exacerbations of COPD?
Background
A study was undertaken to determine whether a short course of antibiotic treatment (< or=5 days) is as effective as the conventional longer treatment in acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).
Methods
MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane central register of controlled trials were searched to July 2006. Studies considered eligible were double-blind randomised clinical trials including adult patients > or=18 years of age with a clinical diagnosis of exacerbation of COPD or chronic bronchitis, no antimicrobial therapy at the time of diagnosis and random assignment to antibiotic treatment for<or=5 days versus >5 days. The primary outcome measure was clinical cure at early follow-up on an intention-to-treat basis.
Results
Twenty-one studies with a total of 10,698 patients were included. The average quality of the studies was high: the mean (SD) Jadad score was 3.9 (0.9). At early follow-up (< 25 days), the summary odds ratio (OR) for clinical cure with short treatment versus conventional treatment was 0.99 (95% CI 0.90–1.08). At late follow-up the summary OR was 1.0 (95% CI 0.91–1.10) and the summary OR for bacteriological cure was 1.05 (95% CI 0.87–1.26). Similar summary ORs were observed for early cure in trials with the same antibiotic in both arms and in studies grouped by the antibiotic class used in the short-course arm.
Conclusions
A short course of antibiotic treatment is as effective as the traditional longer treatment in patients with mild to moderate exacerbations of chronic bronchitis and COPD.
Reproduced with permission from the BMJ Publishing Group.