混合制造商金属在金属全髋关节置换术中的性能

R. Cook, B. Bolland, S. Tilley, J. Latham
{"title":"混合制造商金属在金属全髋关节置换术中的性能","authors":"R. Cook, B. Bolland, S. Tilley, J. Latham","doi":"10.15438/RR.7.2.165","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Using a femoral head from one manufacturer on the stem of another manufacturer poses the risk that the taper interface between the components do not contact correctly and the performance of the joint will be impaired. The cohorts in this study are a combination of modular Birmingham Hip Resurfacing (BHR) and Adept femoral heads on CPT stems. The study reviews the geometry of the taper interfaces to establish if the taper clearance angles was outside of the normal range for other taper interfaces. In addition the rates of material loss from the bearings and taper and a ranking of the stem damage were reviewed to determine if the levels of loss were above that seen for other similar joints. The material loss analysis demonstrated that the rates or levels of loss from the bearings, taper and stem are no different to levels published for manufacturer matched joints and in many cases are lower. The results demonstrate that the taper clearance angles for the mixed manufacturer joints (BHR-CPT: 0.067 to −0.116, Adept-CPT: 0.101 to −0.056) were within the range of other studies and manufacturer matched clearances (0.134 to −0.149). Using components from different manufacturers has not in this instance increased the level of material loss from the joints, when compared to other similar manufacturer matched joints.","PeriodicalId":15048,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery-british Volume","volume":"103 1","pages":"8-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"THE PERFORMANCE OF MIXED MANUFACTURER METAL ON METAL TOTAL HIP REPLACEMENTS\",\"authors\":\"R. Cook, B. Bolland, S. Tilley, J. Latham\",\"doi\":\"10.15438/RR.7.2.165\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Using a femoral head from one manufacturer on the stem of another manufacturer poses the risk that the taper interface between the components do not contact correctly and the performance of the joint will be impaired. The cohorts in this study are a combination of modular Birmingham Hip Resurfacing (BHR) and Adept femoral heads on CPT stems. The study reviews the geometry of the taper interfaces to establish if the taper clearance angles was outside of the normal range for other taper interfaces. In addition the rates of material loss from the bearings and taper and a ranking of the stem damage were reviewed to determine if the levels of loss were above that seen for other similar joints. The material loss analysis demonstrated that the rates or levels of loss from the bearings, taper and stem are no different to levels published for manufacturer matched joints and in many cases are lower. The results demonstrate that the taper clearance angles for the mixed manufacturer joints (BHR-CPT: 0.067 to −0.116, Adept-CPT: 0.101 to −0.056) were within the range of other studies and manufacturer matched clearances (0.134 to −0.149). Using components from different manufacturers has not in this instance increased the level of material loss from the joints, when compared to other similar manufacturer matched joints.\",\"PeriodicalId\":15048,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery-british Volume\",\"volume\":\"103 1\",\"pages\":\"8-8\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery-british Volume\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15438/RR.7.2.165\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery-british Volume","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15438/RR.7.2.165","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

将一个制造商的股骨头用在另一个制造商的股骨头上有可能导致组件之间的锥形界面不能正确接触,从而损害关节的性能。本研究的队列是模块化伯明翰髋关节表面置换(BHR)和CPT柄上的Adept股骨头的组合。研究回顾了锥度界面的几何形状,以确定锥度间隙角是否超出了其他锥度界面的正常范围。此外,还审查了轴承和锥度的材料损失率以及阀杆损伤等级,以确定损失水平是否高于其他类似接头。材料损耗分析表明,轴承、锥度和阀杆的损耗率或水平与制造商发布的匹配接头的水平没有什么不同,在许多情况下甚至更低。结果表明,混合制造商接头的锥度间隙角(BHR-CPT: 0.067至- 0.116,Adept-CPT: 0.101至- 0.056)在其他研究和制造商匹配的间隙(0.134至- 0.149)范围内。与其他类似制造商匹配的接头相比,使用不同制造商的组件在这种情况下不会增加接头的材料损失水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
THE PERFORMANCE OF MIXED MANUFACTURER METAL ON METAL TOTAL HIP REPLACEMENTS
Using a femoral head from one manufacturer on the stem of another manufacturer poses the risk that the taper interface between the components do not contact correctly and the performance of the joint will be impaired. The cohorts in this study are a combination of modular Birmingham Hip Resurfacing (BHR) and Adept femoral heads on CPT stems. The study reviews the geometry of the taper interfaces to establish if the taper clearance angles was outside of the normal range for other taper interfaces. In addition the rates of material loss from the bearings and taper and a ranking of the stem damage were reviewed to determine if the levels of loss were above that seen for other similar joints. The material loss analysis demonstrated that the rates or levels of loss from the bearings, taper and stem are no different to levels published for manufacturer matched joints and in many cases are lower. The results demonstrate that the taper clearance angles for the mixed manufacturer joints (BHR-CPT: 0.067 to −0.116, Adept-CPT: 0.101 to −0.056) were within the range of other studies and manufacturer matched clearances (0.134 to −0.149). Using components from different manufacturers has not in this instance increased the level of material loss from the joints, when compared to other similar manufacturer matched joints.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
2 months
期刊最新文献
Sex Disparities Among Fellowship Program Directors in Orthopaedic Surgery. Osteoarthritis and the Microbiome: Knock, Knock, Anybody Home? Shake, Rattle, and Roll: Is It Time to Bring Sonication into the Operating Room? Sometimes Less Is More! DNA Variation in Spinal Pathologies: Genetics Running Down the Spine
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1