开球修复术后预防眼底病的抗生素方案:美国住院医师培训项目调查。

IF 0.8 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q4 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION Revista Mexicana de Biodiversidad Pub Date : 2023-04-12 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1055/s-0043-1768024
David Fell, Preston H Blomquist
{"title":"开球修复术后预防眼底病的抗生素方案:美国住院医师培训项目调查。","authors":"David Fell, Preston H Blomquist","doi":"10.1055/s-0043-1768024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Purpose</b>  To assess the various approaches to endophthalmitis prevention following traumatic open-globe injury (OGI) repair. <b>Methods</b>  A research electronic data capture (REDCap) questionnaire evaluating the usage of antibiotics and steroids in patients with OGI was distributed to program directors of all U.S. ophthalmology residency programs using the Association of University Professors of Ophthalmology program directors' listserv. Completed questionnaires were analyzed for treatment patterns. <b>Results</b>  The REDCap questionnaire was distributed to 111 programs, with 32 residency programs responding. Two responses were excluded. Ninety percent (27/30) of included programs used perioperative intravenous (IV) antibiotics, with 78% (21/27) of those giving one dose only. At the time of surgery, 27% (8/30) of programs gave intravitreal antibiotics and 60% (18/30) gave subconjunctival antibiotics. Postoperatively, 100% (30/30) gave topical antibiotics and 97% (29/30) gave topical steroids. Only 53% of responders discharged patients on oral antibiotics. Of the three programs who did not use IV antibiotics, all three gave intravitreal therapy and one also discharged patients on oral antibiotics. <b>Conclusion</b>  There is a large variation in practice patterns for endophthalmitis prophylaxis among residency programs. Further investigation is needed to compare rates of endophthalmitis between these protocols and establish a safe and minimally burdensome standard of care.</p>","PeriodicalId":49603,"journal":{"name":"Revista Mexicana de Biodiversidad","volume":"82 1","pages":"e86-e90"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10804764/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Antibiotic Protocols for Endophthalmitis Prophylaxis Following Open-Globe Repair: A Survey of U.S. Residency Programs.\",\"authors\":\"David Fell, Preston H Blomquist\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/s-0043-1768024\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Purpose</b>  To assess the various approaches to endophthalmitis prevention following traumatic open-globe injury (OGI) repair. <b>Methods</b>  A research electronic data capture (REDCap) questionnaire evaluating the usage of antibiotics and steroids in patients with OGI was distributed to program directors of all U.S. ophthalmology residency programs using the Association of University Professors of Ophthalmology program directors' listserv. Completed questionnaires were analyzed for treatment patterns. <b>Results</b>  The REDCap questionnaire was distributed to 111 programs, with 32 residency programs responding. Two responses were excluded. Ninety percent (27/30) of included programs used perioperative intravenous (IV) antibiotics, with 78% (21/27) of those giving one dose only. At the time of surgery, 27% (8/30) of programs gave intravitreal antibiotics and 60% (18/30) gave subconjunctival antibiotics. Postoperatively, 100% (30/30) gave topical antibiotics and 97% (29/30) gave topical steroids. Only 53% of responders discharged patients on oral antibiotics. Of the three programs who did not use IV antibiotics, all three gave intravitreal therapy and one also discharged patients on oral antibiotics. <b>Conclusion</b>  There is a large variation in practice patterns for endophthalmitis prophylaxis among residency programs. Further investigation is needed to compare rates of endophthalmitis between these protocols and establish a safe and minimally burdensome standard of care.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49603,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista Mexicana de Biodiversidad\",\"volume\":\"82 1\",\"pages\":\"e86-e90\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10804764/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista Mexicana de Biodiversidad\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-1768024\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Mexicana de Biodiversidad","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-1768024","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的 评估创伤性开放性眼球损伤 (OGI) 修复术后预防眼内炎的各种方法。方法 通过大学眼科教授协会项目主任列表服务器,向美国所有眼科住院医师项目的项目主任分发了一份研究电子数据采集(REDCap)问卷,评估抗生素和类固醇在 OGI 患者中的使用情况。对完成的问卷进行了治疗模式分析。结果 REDCap问卷共发放给111个项目,32个住院医师项目作了回复。两份答复被排除在外。90%的项目(27/30)使用围手术期静脉注射抗生素,其中78%的项目(21/27)只使用一次。手术时,27%(8/30)的项目使用了玻璃体内抗生素,60%(18/30)的项目使用了结膜下抗生素。术后,100%(30/30)的项目使用局部抗生素,97%(29/30)的项目使用局部类固醇。只有 53% 的响应者让患者口服抗生素出院。在不使用静脉注射抗生素的三个项目中,所有三个项目都给予了玻璃体内治疗,其中一个项目还让患者口服抗生素出院。结论 住院医师培训项目在眼底病预防方面的实践模式差异很大。需要进一步调查,比较这些方案的眼内炎发生率,并制定安全、负担最小的护理标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Antibiotic Protocols for Endophthalmitis Prophylaxis Following Open-Globe Repair: A Survey of U.S. Residency Programs.

Purpose  To assess the various approaches to endophthalmitis prevention following traumatic open-globe injury (OGI) repair. Methods  A research electronic data capture (REDCap) questionnaire evaluating the usage of antibiotics and steroids in patients with OGI was distributed to program directors of all U.S. ophthalmology residency programs using the Association of University Professors of Ophthalmology program directors' listserv. Completed questionnaires were analyzed for treatment patterns. Results  The REDCap questionnaire was distributed to 111 programs, with 32 residency programs responding. Two responses were excluded. Ninety percent (27/30) of included programs used perioperative intravenous (IV) antibiotics, with 78% (21/27) of those giving one dose only. At the time of surgery, 27% (8/30) of programs gave intravitreal antibiotics and 60% (18/30) gave subconjunctival antibiotics. Postoperatively, 100% (30/30) gave topical antibiotics and 97% (29/30) gave topical steroids. Only 53% of responders discharged patients on oral antibiotics. Of the three programs who did not use IV antibiotics, all three gave intravitreal therapy and one also discharged patients on oral antibiotics. Conclusion  There is a large variation in practice patterns for endophthalmitis prophylaxis among residency programs. Further investigation is needed to compare rates of endophthalmitis between these protocols and establish a safe and minimally burdensome standard of care.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Revista Mexicana de Biodiversidad
Revista Mexicana de Biodiversidad 环境科学-生物多样性保护
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
11.10%
发文量
69
审稿时长
12-24 weeks
期刊介绍: Revista Mexicana de Biodiversidad appears in 4 issues per year and publishes the products of original scientific research regarding biodiversity of the Americas (systematics, biogeography, ecology and evolution), as well as its conservation and management. The journal ensures high standards with a system of external peer review, and is included in the list of excellence of journals of the National Council of Science and Technology (CONACyT, Mexico). It is currently included in ASFA, Biological Abstracts, Biological Sciences, Latindex Periódica, RedALyC, Web of Science (Thomson Reuters), SciELO, SCOPUS, and Zoological Records.
期刊最新文献
Revisión taxonómica de Brickellia sección Barroetea (Asteraceae: Eupatorieae) con base en análisis multivariados Saprotrophic fungi from Juniperus deppeana (Cupressaceae) forest: isolation, identification, in vitro culture, and preservation Riqueza y endemismo de la flora vascular de Guanajuato, México New species of Cosmocerca (Nematoda: Cosmocercidae), parasite of Leptodactylus melanonotus in Western Mexico, and new records for this species and Incilius marmoreus (Amphibia) Composición de la vegetación tras el establecimiento de un área natural protegida en el noroeste de México
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1