从双方的角度决定堕胎:二元分析

Joke Vandamme, A. Buysse, T. Loeys, C. Vrancken, G. T’Sjoen
{"title":"从双方的角度决定堕胎:二元分析","authors":"Joke Vandamme, A. Buysse, T. Loeys, C. Vrancken, G. T’Sjoen","doi":"10.1080/13625187.2016.1255940","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Objectives: Male partners are often involved in induced abortion although they have no legal rights. It is, however, unknown how women’s thoughts and feelings regarding the decision for abortion are associated with the decisional experiences of the involved male partners and vice versa. Methods: Flemish women and their involved male partners (IMP) filled out a questionnaire on abortion motives and feelings of decisiveness in the abortion centre waiting room (N = 106 couples). Actor Partner Interdependence Models investigated whether the decisiveness of one partner was associated with a subjective feeling of autonomy (high internal, low external abortion motivation) and decisiveness of the other partner, above and beyond the own feeling of autonomy and personal vulnerabilities for being uncertain. Results: Partner congruence in motivation and decisiveness was substantial (r= 0.23 to 0.42), especially for cohabiting partners. The IMPs were less internally motivated for the abortion than the women but both partners reported more internal than external motives, and they both tended to feel certain. In contrast to the women, a higher subjective feeling of autonomy in the IMPs was not associated with feeling more certain. When accounting for partners’ living situation, levels of uncertainty were not only associated with personal vulnerabilities for being uncertain, but were also related to the degree of uncertainty and subjective level of autonomy of the other partner. Conclusions: Partners’ thoughts and feelings regarding the decision for abortion partially have an interpersonal basis and mostly run parallel despite an inherent gender difference in level and importance of decision autonomy.","PeriodicalId":22423,"journal":{"name":"The European Journal of Contraception & Reproductive Health Care","volume":"37 1","pages":"30 - 37"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The decision to have an abortion from both partners’ perspectives: a dyadic analysis\",\"authors\":\"Joke Vandamme, A. Buysse, T. Loeys, C. Vrancken, G. T’Sjoen\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13625187.2016.1255940\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Objectives: Male partners are often involved in induced abortion although they have no legal rights. It is, however, unknown how women’s thoughts and feelings regarding the decision for abortion are associated with the decisional experiences of the involved male partners and vice versa. Methods: Flemish women and their involved male partners (IMP) filled out a questionnaire on abortion motives and feelings of decisiveness in the abortion centre waiting room (N = 106 couples). Actor Partner Interdependence Models investigated whether the decisiveness of one partner was associated with a subjective feeling of autonomy (high internal, low external abortion motivation) and decisiveness of the other partner, above and beyond the own feeling of autonomy and personal vulnerabilities for being uncertain. Results: Partner congruence in motivation and decisiveness was substantial (r= 0.23 to 0.42), especially for cohabiting partners. The IMPs were less internally motivated for the abortion than the women but both partners reported more internal than external motives, and they both tended to feel certain. In contrast to the women, a higher subjective feeling of autonomy in the IMPs was not associated with feeling more certain. When accounting for partners’ living situation, levels of uncertainty were not only associated with personal vulnerabilities for being uncertain, but were also related to the degree of uncertainty and subjective level of autonomy of the other partner. Conclusions: Partners’ thoughts and feelings regarding the decision for abortion partially have an interpersonal basis and mostly run parallel despite an inherent gender difference in level and importance of decision autonomy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":22423,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The European Journal of Contraception & Reproductive Health Care\",\"volume\":\"37 1\",\"pages\":\"30 - 37\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The European Journal of Contraception & Reproductive Health Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13625187.2016.1255940\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The European Journal of Contraception & Reproductive Health Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13625187.2016.1255940","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

【摘要】目的:男性伴侣虽然没有合法权利,但经常卷入人工流产。然而,尚不清楚妇女对堕胎决定的想法和感受如何与所涉男性伴侣的决定经验相关联,反之亦然。方法:法兰德女性及其男性伴侣在堕胎中心候诊室对106对夫妇的堕胎动机和决定感进行问卷调查。演员伴侣相互依赖模型调查了一方的决定是否与主观自主感(高内部,低外部流产动机)和另一方的决定有关,超出了自己的自主感和个人不确定的脆弱性。结果:伴侣在动机和决策上的一致性是显著的(r= 0.23 ~ 0.42),尤其是同居伴侣。与女性相比,imp流产的内在动机较少,但双方的内在动机都多于外部动机,而且他们都倾向于感到肯定。与女性不同的是,在imp中,更高的主观自主感与更确定的感觉无关。当考虑伴侣的生活状况时,不确定性水平不仅与个人的不确定性脆弱性有关,而且还与另一方的不确定性程度和主观自治水平有关。结论:伴侣对堕胎决策的想法和感受部分有人际基础,大部分是平行的,尽管在决策自主的水平和重要性上存在固有的性别差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The decision to have an abortion from both partners’ perspectives: a dyadic analysis
Abstract Objectives: Male partners are often involved in induced abortion although they have no legal rights. It is, however, unknown how women’s thoughts and feelings regarding the decision for abortion are associated with the decisional experiences of the involved male partners and vice versa. Methods: Flemish women and their involved male partners (IMP) filled out a questionnaire on abortion motives and feelings of decisiveness in the abortion centre waiting room (N = 106 couples). Actor Partner Interdependence Models investigated whether the decisiveness of one partner was associated with a subjective feeling of autonomy (high internal, low external abortion motivation) and decisiveness of the other partner, above and beyond the own feeling of autonomy and personal vulnerabilities for being uncertain. Results: Partner congruence in motivation and decisiveness was substantial (r= 0.23 to 0.42), especially for cohabiting partners. The IMPs were less internally motivated for the abortion than the women but both partners reported more internal than external motives, and they both tended to feel certain. In contrast to the women, a higher subjective feeling of autonomy in the IMPs was not associated with feeling more certain. When accounting for partners’ living situation, levels of uncertainty were not only associated with personal vulnerabilities for being uncertain, but were also related to the degree of uncertainty and subjective level of autonomy of the other partner. Conclusions: Partners’ thoughts and feelings regarding the decision for abortion partially have an interpersonal basis and mostly run parallel despite an inherent gender difference in level and importance of decision autonomy.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Pain relief during intrauterine device placement in nulligravid women with both oral ketorolac and an analgesic: a double-blinded randomised trial Legal abortion requests and outcomes for women when the law is restrictive – experience from a referral centre in south-eastern Brazil ‘Do I want children later in life?’ Reproductive intentions of 1700 adolescents Oestrogens in oral contraception: considerations for tailoring prescription to women’s needs Prevalence of high-risk HPV and cervical dysplasia in IUD users and controls: a cross sectional study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1