孟德斯鸠和颓废。罗马人周围的一些符号

Q4 Arts and Humanities Montesquieu.it Pub Date : 2012-12-01 DOI:10.6092/ISSN.2421-4124/5159
L. Dileo
{"title":"孟德斯鸠和颓废。罗马人周围的一些符号","authors":"L. Dileo","doi":"10.6092/ISSN.2421-4124/5159","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Here I examine the issue of decadence in Montesquieu’s political philosophy, as it raises especially from Considerations sur les Romains, as well as from some significant parts of L’Esprit des lois devoted to ancient Romans. The Roman case is important as it may offer an account of the author’s view of philosophy of history and of his conception of “general causes” that determine the progress, the preservation or the decline of societies and political institutions. It is also important as it involves Montesquieu’s theory of “good government”, that is both the ethical principles which the life of nations and institutions should be founded on, and the political argument of “mixed government”, a government in which political liberty is granted by a system of balance of powers that ensures the participation of each social and political force. The ancient Roman republic is an example of this kind of political system, and Roman imperialism was one of the main causes of its corruption. Even if the fate of the Roman empire cannot be easily explained – due to the role played by a complexity of different causes – following Montesquieu, we might say that its history especially tells us something extremely important about the necessity (and difficulty) of equity in governing and, consequently, about the infinite dialectic of liberty and oppression.","PeriodicalId":36096,"journal":{"name":"Montesquieu.it","volume":"39 1","pages":"165"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Montesquieu e la décadence. Alcune annotazioni intorno ai Romains\",\"authors\":\"L. Dileo\",\"doi\":\"10.6092/ISSN.2421-4124/5159\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Here I examine the issue of decadence in Montesquieu’s political philosophy, as it raises especially from Considerations sur les Romains, as well as from some significant parts of L’Esprit des lois devoted to ancient Romans. The Roman case is important as it may offer an account of the author’s view of philosophy of history and of his conception of “general causes” that determine the progress, the preservation or the decline of societies and political institutions. It is also important as it involves Montesquieu’s theory of “good government”, that is both the ethical principles which the life of nations and institutions should be founded on, and the political argument of “mixed government”, a government in which political liberty is granted by a system of balance of powers that ensures the participation of each social and political force. The ancient Roman republic is an example of this kind of political system, and Roman imperialism was one of the main causes of its corruption. Even if the fate of the Roman empire cannot be easily explained – due to the role played by a complexity of different causes – following Montesquieu, we might say that its history especially tells us something extremely important about the necessity (and difficulty) of equity in governing and, consequently, about the infinite dialectic of liberty and oppression.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36096,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Montesquieu.it\",\"volume\":\"39 1\",\"pages\":\"165\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Montesquieu.it\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.6092/ISSN.2421-4124/5159\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Montesquieu.it","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.6092/ISSN.2421-4124/5159","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在这里,我考察了孟德斯鸠政治哲学中的颓废问题,因为它特别来自《对罗马人的思考》,以及《法的精神》中专门讨论古罗马人的一些重要部分。罗马的案例很重要,因为它可以提供作者对历史哲学的看法,以及他关于决定社会和政治制度的进步、保存或衰落的“一般原因”的概念。它也很重要,因为它涉及到孟德斯鸠的“好政府”理论,即国家和机构的生活应该建立在伦理原则之上,以及“混合政府”的政治论点,在这种政府中,政治自由是由权力平衡系统授予的,确保每一种社会和政治力量的参与。古罗马共和国就是这种政治制度的一个例子,罗马帝国主义是其腐败的主要原因之一。即使罗马帝国的命运不能轻易解释——由于不同原因的复杂性——孟德斯鸠之后,我们可以说,它的历史特别告诉我们一些极其重要的东西,关于治理公平的必要性(和困难),因此,关于自由和压迫的无限辩证法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Montesquieu e la décadence. Alcune annotazioni intorno ai Romains
Here I examine the issue of decadence in Montesquieu’s political philosophy, as it raises especially from Considerations sur les Romains, as well as from some significant parts of L’Esprit des lois devoted to ancient Romans. The Roman case is important as it may offer an account of the author’s view of philosophy of history and of his conception of “general causes” that determine the progress, the preservation or the decline of societies and political institutions. It is also important as it involves Montesquieu’s theory of “good government”, that is both the ethical principles which the life of nations and institutions should be founded on, and the political argument of “mixed government”, a government in which political liberty is granted by a system of balance of powers that ensures the participation of each social and political force. The ancient Roman republic is an example of this kind of political system, and Roman imperialism was one of the main causes of its corruption. Even if the fate of the Roman empire cannot be easily explained – due to the role played by a complexity of different causes – following Montesquieu, we might say that its history especially tells us something extremely important about the necessity (and difficulty) of equity in governing and, consequently, about the infinite dialectic of liberty and oppression.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Montesquieu.it
Montesquieu.it Arts and Humanities-History
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
Contesti smithiani: transizione, progresso e conflitto Considerazioni su Voltaire studioso di Pietro il Grande e della Russia «Orgogliose come demoni»: le monache ribelli di Port-Royal L’esperienza e la certezza. Postille a Pascal, Opere complete. Prima tra-duzione italiana , testi francesi e latini a fronte, a cura di M.V. Romeo, Firenze-Milano, Giunti-Bompiani, 2020, XXXIX-3133 pp. Lavoro e libertà nelle speculazioni di Gianvincenzo Gravina, di Giambattista Vico e di Francesco Longano
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1