弥合灰色鸿沟:伦理社会工作实践与研究的灰色文献综述

IF 1.6 4区 社会学 Q2 SOCIAL WORK Journal of the Society for Social Work and Research Pub Date : 2021-10-20 DOI:10.1086/717731
M. Christensen, J. Todić, Sheila M. McMahon
{"title":"弥合灰色鸿沟:伦理社会工作实践与研究的灰色文献综述","authors":"M. Christensen, J. Todić, Sheila M. McMahon","doi":"10.1086/717731","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article provides a social work approach to reviewing the grey literature as part of a scoping or systematic review that attends to all layers of the social ecology through a person-in-environment framework. Little guidance exists on how to conduct a grey literature review specific to social work. Yet, consulting the grey literature—which often includes knowledge generated by practitioners and community members outside of academia—aligns with social work’s commitment to social justice, integrity, and competence because the grey literature contains case-specific and contemporary information about social work practice. Although academic knowledge about addressing injustices has value, it is often constrained by the neoliberal political economy, which emphasizes depoliticized market-based solutions to social issues and (re)produces inequities. Consequently, sole reliance on academic evidence compromises social workers’ ethical commitment to integrity, competence, and social justice. We use a scoping review focused on restorative and transformative justice responses to sexual violence as a case study demonstrating the value of grey literature in social work. We argue that grey literature should be part of evidence-informed ethical social work practice and recommend a social work approach to reviewing the grey literature that incorporates the person-in-environment framework.","PeriodicalId":51692,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Society for Social Work and Research","volume":"27 1","pages":"609 - 635"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bridging the Grey Gap: Conducting Grey Literature Reviews for Ethical Social Work Practice and Research\",\"authors\":\"M. Christensen, J. Todić, Sheila M. McMahon\",\"doi\":\"10.1086/717731\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article provides a social work approach to reviewing the grey literature as part of a scoping or systematic review that attends to all layers of the social ecology through a person-in-environment framework. Little guidance exists on how to conduct a grey literature review specific to social work. Yet, consulting the grey literature—which often includes knowledge generated by practitioners and community members outside of academia—aligns with social work’s commitment to social justice, integrity, and competence because the grey literature contains case-specific and contemporary information about social work practice. Although academic knowledge about addressing injustices has value, it is often constrained by the neoliberal political economy, which emphasizes depoliticized market-based solutions to social issues and (re)produces inequities. Consequently, sole reliance on academic evidence compromises social workers’ ethical commitment to integrity, competence, and social justice. We use a scoping review focused on restorative and transformative justice responses to sexual violence as a case study demonstrating the value of grey literature in social work. We argue that grey literature should be part of evidence-informed ethical social work practice and recommend a social work approach to reviewing the grey literature that incorporates the person-in-environment framework.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51692,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the Society for Social Work and Research\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"609 - 635\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the Society for Social Work and Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1086/717731\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIAL WORK\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Society for Social Work and Research","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/717731","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIAL WORK","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

本文提供了一种社会工作方法来审查灰色文献,作为范围或系统审查的一部分,通过人在环境的框架来关注社会生态的所有层面。关于如何进行针对社会工作的灰色文献综述的指导很少。然而,咨询灰色文献——通常包括从业人员和学术界以外的社区成员产生的知识——与社会工作对社会正义、诚信和能力的承诺是一致的,因为灰色文献包含了关于社会工作实践的具体案例和当代信息。虽然关于解决不公正的学术知识有价值,但它经常受到新自由主义政治经济学的限制,新自由主义政治经济学强调非政治化的基于市场的社会问题解决方案,并(重新)产生不平等。因此,单纯依赖学术证据会损害社会工作者对诚信、能力和社会正义的道德承诺。我们使用范围审查侧重于恢复性和变革性司法应对性暴力作为一个案例研究,证明灰色文献在社会工作中的价值。我们认为,灰色文献应该成为循证伦理社会工作实践的一部分,并推荐一种社会工作方法来审查灰色文献,其中包括人在环境中的框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Bridging the Grey Gap: Conducting Grey Literature Reviews for Ethical Social Work Practice and Research
This article provides a social work approach to reviewing the grey literature as part of a scoping or systematic review that attends to all layers of the social ecology through a person-in-environment framework. Little guidance exists on how to conduct a grey literature review specific to social work. Yet, consulting the grey literature—which often includes knowledge generated by practitioners and community members outside of academia—aligns with social work’s commitment to social justice, integrity, and competence because the grey literature contains case-specific and contemporary information about social work practice. Although academic knowledge about addressing injustices has value, it is often constrained by the neoliberal political economy, which emphasizes depoliticized market-based solutions to social issues and (re)produces inequities. Consequently, sole reliance on academic evidence compromises social workers’ ethical commitment to integrity, competence, and social justice. We use a scoping review focused on restorative and transformative justice responses to sexual violence as a case study demonstrating the value of grey literature in social work. We argue that grey literature should be part of evidence-informed ethical social work practice and recommend a social work approach to reviewing the grey literature that incorporates the person-in-environment framework.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
49
期刊介绍: The Journal of the Society for Social Work and Research is a peer-reviewed publication dedicated to presenting innovative, rigorous original research on social problems, intervention programs, and policies. By creating a venue for the timely dissemination of empirical findings and advances in research methods, JSSWR seeks to strengthen the rigor of social work research and advance the knowledge in social work and allied professions and disciplines. Special emphasis is placed on publishing findings on the effectiveness of social and health services, including public policies and practices. JSSWR publishes an array of perspectives, research approaches, and types of analyses that advance knowledge useful for designing social programs, developing innovative public policies, and improving social work practice.
期刊最新文献
For External Remuneration or Intrinsic Remuneration—or Both? Predictors of Turnover Intention Among Social Workers in China Police Contact, Collective Efficacy, and Grit among Youth in Urban Areas Prioritizing community expertise in decarceration research: Exploring the social capacity concept in two high incarceration neighborhoods Material hardship and mental health among older Americans during the COVID-19 pandemic Experiences of Queer People of Color in Mental Health Care and Substance Use Treatment: A Systematic Review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1