医院抗海啸结构稳健性指数的发展

IF 1.7 3区 工程技术 Q3 ENGINEERING, CIVIL Civil Engineering and Environmental Systems Pub Date : 2021-02-28 DOI:10.1080/10286608.2021.1890045
H. Hasalanka, C. Siriwardana, Devmini Kularatne, W. Dias
{"title":"医院抗海啸结构稳健性指数的发展","authors":"H. Hasalanka, C. Siriwardana, Devmini Kularatne, W. Dias","doi":"10.1080/10286608.2021.1890045","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The structural robustness of buildings in a hospital contributes significantly to its overall robustness. This study describes the development of a structural robustness assessment tool with a focus on natural hazards using a Rapid Visual Screening method. First, robustness attributes were identified, along with well-defined assessment criteria. Then the relative importance of each attribute was obtained through expert opinion surveys using a pairwise comparison method following the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP). This led to the defining of a Structural Robustness Index (SRI), using the well-established Papathoma Tsunami Vulnerability Assessment (PTVA) method as a guide, but deviating significantly from it when necessary. The tool was applied in a case study for assessing the tsunami robustness of buildings in six hospitals. Results showed that SRI is a better index of robustness compared to the PTVA, both because it yields a greater index range across the buildings assessed, and also because it signals as robust, structural forms that are well known to be so. The construction material and number of storeys were found to be the most significant building attributes responsible for variations in the SRI, while shielding from surrounding buildings and protection from natural barriers the most significant surroundings attributes.","PeriodicalId":50689,"journal":{"name":"Civil Engineering and Environmental Systems","volume":"47 1","pages":"85 - 101"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development of a Structural Robustness Index against tsunamis for hospitals\",\"authors\":\"H. Hasalanka, C. Siriwardana, Devmini Kularatne, W. Dias\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10286608.2021.1890045\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT The structural robustness of buildings in a hospital contributes significantly to its overall robustness. This study describes the development of a structural robustness assessment tool with a focus on natural hazards using a Rapid Visual Screening method. First, robustness attributes were identified, along with well-defined assessment criteria. Then the relative importance of each attribute was obtained through expert opinion surveys using a pairwise comparison method following the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP). This led to the defining of a Structural Robustness Index (SRI), using the well-established Papathoma Tsunami Vulnerability Assessment (PTVA) method as a guide, but deviating significantly from it when necessary. The tool was applied in a case study for assessing the tsunami robustness of buildings in six hospitals. Results showed that SRI is a better index of robustness compared to the PTVA, both because it yields a greater index range across the buildings assessed, and also because it signals as robust, structural forms that are well known to be so. The construction material and number of storeys were found to be the most significant building attributes responsible for variations in the SRI, while shielding from surrounding buildings and protection from natural barriers the most significant surroundings attributes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":50689,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Civil Engineering and Environmental Systems\",\"volume\":\"47 1\",\"pages\":\"85 - 101\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-02-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Civil Engineering and Environmental Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10286608.2021.1890045\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, CIVIL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Civil Engineering and Environmental Systems","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10286608.2021.1890045","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

摘要医院建筑的结构稳健性对其整体稳健性有重要贡献。本研究描述了一种结构稳健性评估工具的发展,重点是使用快速视觉筛选方法对自然灾害进行评估。首先,确定了鲁棒性属性,以及定义良好的评估标准。然后采用层次分析法(AHP)的两两比较方法,通过专家意见调查得出各属性的相对重要性。这导致了结构稳健性指数(SRI)的定义,使用公认的Papathoma海啸脆弱性评估(PTVA)方法作为指导,但在必要时明显偏离它。该工具已用于评估六家医院建筑物的海啸稳健性的案例研究。结果表明,与PTVA相比,SRI是一个更好的稳健性指数,因为它在评估的建筑物中产生了更大的指数范围,也因为它表明了众所周知的稳健性,结构形式。研究发现,建筑材料和楼层数是导致SRI变化的最重要的建筑属性,而对周围建筑的屏蔽和对自然屏障的保护是最重要的环境属性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Development of a Structural Robustness Index against tsunamis for hospitals
ABSTRACT The structural robustness of buildings in a hospital contributes significantly to its overall robustness. This study describes the development of a structural robustness assessment tool with a focus on natural hazards using a Rapid Visual Screening method. First, robustness attributes were identified, along with well-defined assessment criteria. Then the relative importance of each attribute was obtained through expert opinion surveys using a pairwise comparison method following the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP). This led to the defining of a Structural Robustness Index (SRI), using the well-established Papathoma Tsunami Vulnerability Assessment (PTVA) method as a guide, but deviating significantly from it when necessary. The tool was applied in a case study for assessing the tsunami robustness of buildings in six hospitals. Results showed that SRI is a better index of robustness compared to the PTVA, both because it yields a greater index range across the buildings assessed, and also because it signals as robust, structural forms that are well known to be so. The construction material and number of storeys were found to be the most significant building attributes responsible for variations in the SRI, while shielding from surrounding buildings and protection from natural barriers the most significant surroundings attributes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Civil Engineering and Environmental Systems
Civil Engineering and Environmental Systems 工程技术-工程:土木
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
16.70%
发文量
10
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Civil Engineering and Environmental Systems is devoted to the advancement of systems thinking and systems techniques throughout systems engineering, environmental engineering decision-making, and engineering management. We do this by publishing the practical applications and developments of "hard" and "soft" systems techniques and thinking. Submissions that allow for better analysis of civil engineering and environmental systems might look at: -Civil Engineering optimization -Risk assessment in engineering -Civil engineering decision analysis -System identification in engineering -Civil engineering numerical simulation -Uncertainty modelling in engineering -Qualitative modelling of complex engineering systems
期刊最新文献
Accuracy of stochastic finite element analyses for the safety assessment of unreinforced masonry shear walls Investigating the influencing parameters with automated scour severity detection using Bayesian neural networks Celebrating 40 years of the CEES journal Carbon footprint assessment of maintenance and rehabilitation techniques for sewer systems Systems methods and real world practice – Paul Jowitt’s pilgrimage in his writings for this journal
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1