表达性和接受性语言

Lauren Hope Simonis, Senior Thesis, Lauren Hope Simorus
{"title":"表达性和接受性语言","authors":"Lauren Hope Simonis, Senior Thesis, Lauren Hope Simorus","doi":"10.4135/9781483380810.n243","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Expressive and Receptive Language 3 The differences in the development of the acquisition of prepositions among two, three, and four-years olds were investigated. Acquisition was looked at both receptively and expressively. The children who were voluntarily involved in the study \"played a game\" by answering questions pertaining to the spatial relationship between a block and a bin. The results of the study showed that both age and the type of language were both significant factors in the number of correct responses. The study also showed that the interaction between the age and the type oflanguage was also a significant factor in the number of correct responses. The findings are consistent with the current literature. Expressive and Receptive Language 4 The Acquisition of Prepositions: Comparing the Expressive and Receptive Language of Two, Three, and Four-Year Olds The idea for my thesis developed from a class I took Spring Term of my junior year, introduction to Language and Linguistics. As an elementary education major and English-writing minor, this topic was something that I had never studied but that certainly intrigued me. Although l had spent years learning about the tremendous task of learning to read, I had never considered the question of how children learn to speak. The more I learned about language acquisition in general, the more 1 wanted to know. I have spent the last three years working at Children' s World Learning Center, a day care center in Vernon Hills. During my work there, 1 began paying closer attention to the differences in the language skills of the children and quickly discovered that these children developed at varied rates, which, of course, came as no surprise. My combined experiences lead me to the topic of my thesis-the acquisition of prepositions. r wanted my thesis to involve direct work with children. I did not want to simply read about what children do; 1 wanted to discover that for myself. I decided that I wanted to do some sort of diagnostic test with children to determine which prepositions they understood compared to which prepositions they could use. I chose to use prepositions because most other basic language develops earlier; prepositions are still emerging at this age. ln the beginning I thought that this task would involve two-yearolds. Before conducting any sort of test, I needed to do some background research. I was unable to find any journal articles written on this specific subject. I found and read articles concerning infant-directed speech, preschoolers' uses of multiple labels for objects, Expressive and Receptive Language 5 Noam Chomsky>s theories of language acquisition, and arguments to rus theories, as well as countless other topics within the field of language acquisition. 1 consulted a few textbooks and found limited infonnation. I then decided that the limited information gave me sufficient background knowledge t o conduct my test . I decided that I would compare the expressive language (the language that is produced and used in conte>.'t) with the receptive language (the language that is understood) of not only two-year-olds, but threeyear-olds as well. Eventually I added four-year-olds to the test. At trus point, I conceived of a diagnostic test in which I would utilize two objects to illustrate various spatial relationships. I consulted Kathleen Czaplewski, an Early Childhood Speech and Language Pathologist in District 203, and asked her about the test she uses. She explained the test commonly used in the field, which was similar to the test I bad developed, so I felt confident in using my test. The point of this study was simply to compare the differences between expressive and receptive language among different age groups of children. I predicted that the receptive language would be more developed in all three age groups and that the older children would have larger receptive and expressive vocabularies. I also predicted that there would be an interaction between the age and the development of both receptive and expressive language. Background Around the time of a child' s first birthday, he or she utters his or her first words. This period is .known as the .. one-word\" stage, in which a child speaks using one-word sentences. Around the age of 18 months, children begin to move into what is known as the \"two-word'' stage. It is in this stage that children begin to combine words to create Expressive and Receptive Language 6 sentences. The sentences are simple, using the same few patterns repeatedly. According to Brown ( 1973 ), there are eight basic constructions that are created in the two-word stage. These eight constructions are: agent + action, action + object, agent + object, action + location, entity + location, possessor + possession, entity + attribute, and demonstrative + entity. According to Ashcraft (1998), what is important about the two-word utterances is that they express semantic rather than syntactic connections; that is, they express ideas rather than syntactic rules. Soon after the two-word stage, children begin to create more complex constructions, involving more than two words, thus called the \"multi-word\" stage. Moskowitz ( J 978) explains that the speech of this time has been called \"telegraphic speech\" and is characterized by \"short, simple sentences made up primarily of content words: words that are rich in semantic content, usually nouns and verbs\" (97). Moskowitz also explains that the reason the speech is called telegraphic is that it initia!Jy lacks function words. However, Ashcraft ( 1998) states that it is during this stage that important syntactical structures begin to appear, such as -ing, plurals, and articles. It is near the end of this stage that children ' s sentences begin to sound more and more like the adult sentences we are used to hearing. Between the ages of two and four, a child' s vocabulary drastically increases in size. According to Smith (as cited by Moskowitz, 1998), at age two, a child' s vocabulary consists of approximately 225 words; by the time that child is four, the size of the vocabulary bas risen to 1,426 words. That is an increase of over six times as many words. In fact, according to Bower ( 1998), after age two, toddlers increase their vocabularies daily by as many as nine words. Expressive and Receptive Language 7 According to Moskowitz (1978), the prepositions ''in\" and \"on\" are usually the first to appear in the vocabulary of a child. In fact , according to Ashcraft ( 1998), the acquisition of these two prepositions comes early on in the sequence of graphical morphemes, only after the present progressive. It comes before the acquisition of the plural and irregular past tense. Owens (1992) states that prepositions that describe a topographic relation (''in,\" \"on,'' ''under\") are easier for a child to grasp than those that describe dimensional spatial relations (\"behind,\" \"beside,\" \"between,\" and \"in front of'), A child can better understand spatial relationships when applied to an object with obvious sides, such as a box. Moskowitz explains that the acquisition of prepositions such as \"behind\" and \" in front of' cannot be determined by age or stage of development; these prepositions appear as a result of an individual child' s experiences and \"frame of reference.\" Ashcraft ( 1998) states that a child ' s receptive vocabulary is almost always larger than his or her expressive vocabulary, meaning that a child may understand what a particular word, in this case preposition, means but may not use it in his or her own speech. Based upon this research, results of the study can be predicted. Most of the children should understand the prepositions \"in\" and \"on\" because those prepositions are seen early in the development of language. Because \"under\" and \"over\" are other prepositions that describe topographical relations, they should be ones that are more revalent. \"Behind,\" \"beside,\" \"between,\" \"in front of,\" and \"next to\" will be the more difficult prepositions for tbe children to understand and use, so those should be less frequent in the study. Because receptive vocabulary is almost always greater than the Expressive and Receptive Language 8 expressive vocabulary, the children should understand more of the prepositions that they are able to use. Since children will gain experiences and references with age, the older children should understand and use a greater number of prepositions than the younger children. Method Participants The children who participated in this study are all enrolled at Children's World Learning Center on West End Court in Vernon Hills. Since the original experiment was to compare two-year-olds with three-year-olds, seven children of each age participated in the test. Five four-year-olds were added as an extra comparison. I wanted participation in this study to be voluntary because l felt that forcing a child to participate would hinder the results. 1 felt that the task needed to contain an element of fun in order for the child to give his or her fuU attention and therefore more accurately represent his or her knowledge. Materials A rectangular wooden block, approximately 5\" x 3\" x I\", and an 11.4 quart Rubbermaid bin were the two objects used in the task. L also used a table with two chairs sitting across from each other, at which l conducted the test. l created a recording sheet in which !listed the eight prepositions 1 wanted to test (in, on, beside. next to, over, under, in front of, and behind). The sheet contained a column for both receptive and expressive tasks. Procedure Expressive and Receptive Language 9 l decided to begin with the receptive task because, as noted earlier, children almost always have a larger receptive vocabulary than expressive vocabulary. Therefore, I felt that the children would be more successful at the receptive task. J chose to start the children with what would be easier for them so that J would not discourage them. Also, I felt that doi","PeriodicalId":22890,"journal":{"name":"The SAGE Encyclopedia of Human Communication Sciences and Disorders","volume":"5 3 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Expressive and Receptive Language\",\"authors\":\"Lauren Hope Simonis, Senior Thesis, Lauren Hope Simorus\",\"doi\":\"10.4135/9781483380810.n243\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Expressive and Receptive Language 3 The differences in the development of the acquisition of prepositions among two, three, and four-years olds were investigated. Acquisition was looked at both receptively and expressively. The children who were voluntarily involved in the study \\\"played a game\\\" by answering questions pertaining to the spatial relationship between a block and a bin. The results of the study showed that both age and the type of language were both significant factors in the number of correct responses. The study also showed that the interaction between the age and the type oflanguage was also a significant factor in the number of correct responses. The findings are consistent with the current literature. Expressive and Receptive Language 4 The Acquisition of Prepositions: Comparing the Expressive and Receptive Language of Two, Three, and Four-Year Olds The idea for my thesis developed from a class I took Spring Term of my junior year, introduction to Language and Linguistics. As an elementary education major and English-writing minor, this topic was something that I had never studied but that certainly intrigued me. Although l had spent years learning about the tremendous task of learning to read, I had never considered the question of how children learn to speak. The more I learned about language acquisition in general, the more 1 wanted to know. I have spent the last three years working at Children' s World Learning Center, a day care center in Vernon Hills. During my work there, 1 began paying closer attention to the differences in the language skills of the children and quickly discovered that these children developed at varied rates, which, of course, came as no surprise. My combined experiences lead me to the topic of my thesis-the acquisition of prepositions. r wanted my thesis to involve direct work with children. I did not want to simply read about what children do; 1 wanted to discover that for myself. I decided that I wanted to do some sort of diagnostic test with children to determine which prepositions they understood compared to which prepositions they could use. I chose to use prepositions because most other basic language develops earlier; prepositions are still emerging at this age. ln the beginning I thought that this task would involve two-yearolds. Before conducting any sort of test, I needed to do some background research. I was unable to find any journal articles written on this specific subject. I found and read articles concerning infant-directed speech, preschoolers' uses of multiple labels for objects, Expressive and Receptive Language 5 Noam Chomsky>s theories of language acquisition, and arguments to rus theories, as well as countless other topics within the field of language acquisition. 1 consulted a few textbooks and found limited infonnation. I then decided that the limited information gave me sufficient background knowledge t o conduct my test . I decided that I would compare the expressive language (the language that is produced and used in conte>.'t) with the receptive language (the language that is understood) of not only two-year-olds, but threeyear-olds as well. Eventually I added four-year-olds to the test. At trus point, I conceived of a diagnostic test in which I would utilize two objects to illustrate various spatial relationships. I consulted Kathleen Czaplewski, an Early Childhood Speech and Language Pathologist in District 203, and asked her about the test she uses. She explained the test commonly used in the field, which was similar to the test I bad developed, so I felt confident in using my test. The point of this study was simply to compare the differences between expressive and receptive language among different age groups of children. I predicted that the receptive language would be more developed in all three age groups and that the older children would have larger receptive and expressive vocabularies. I also predicted that there would be an interaction between the age and the development of both receptive and expressive language. Background Around the time of a child' s first birthday, he or she utters his or her first words. This period is .known as the .. one-word\\\" stage, in which a child speaks using one-word sentences. Around the age of 18 months, children begin to move into what is known as the \\\"two-word'' stage. It is in this stage that children begin to combine words to create Expressive and Receptive Language 6 sentences. The sentences are simple, using the same few patterns repeatedly. According to Brown ( 1973 ), there are eight basic constructions that are created in the two-word stage. These eight constructions are: agent + action, action + object, agent + object, action + location, entity + location, possessor + possession, entity + attribute, and demonstrative + entity. According to Ashcraft (1998), what is important about the two-word utterances is that they express semantic rather than syntactic connections; that is, they express ideas rather than syntactic rules. Soon after the two-word stage, children begin to create more complex constructions, involving more than two words, thus called the \\\"multi-word\\\" stage. Moskowitz ( J 978) explains that the speech of this time has been called \\\"telegraphic speech\\\" and is characterized by \\\"short, simple sentences made up primarily of content words: words that are rich in semantic content, usually nouns and verbs\\\" (97). Moskowitz also explains that the reason the speech is called telegraphic is that it initia!Jy lacks function words. However, Ashcraft ( 1998) states that it is during this stage that important syntactical structures begin to appear, such as -ing, plurals, and articles. It is near the end of this stage that children ' s sentences begin to sound more and more like the adult sentences we are used to hearing. Between the ages of two and four, a child' s vocabulary drastically increases in size. According to Smith (as cited by Moskowitz, 1998), at age two, a child' s vocabulary consists of approximately 225 words; by the time that child is four, the size of the vocabulary bas risen to 1,426 words. That is an increase of over six times as many words. In fact, according to Bower ( 1998), after age two, toddlers increase their vocabularies daily by as many as nine words. Expressive and Receptive Language 7 According to Moskowitz (1978), the prepositions ''in\\\" and \\\"on\\\" are usually the first to appear in the vocabulary of a child. In fact , according to Ashcraft ( 1998), the acquisition of these two prepositions comes early on in the sequence of graphical morphemes, only after the present progressive. It comes before the acquisition of the plural and irregular past tense. Owens (1992) states that prepositions that describe a topographic relation (''in,\\\" \\\"on,'' ''under\\\") are easier for a child to grasp than those that describe dimensional spatial relations (\\\"behind,\\\" \\\"beside,\\\" \\\"between,\\\" and \\\"in front of'), A child can better understand spatial relationships when applied to an object with obvious sides, such as a box. Moskowitz explains that the acquisition of prepositions such as \\\"behind\\\" and \\\" in front of' cannot be determined by age or stage of development; these prepositions appear as a result of an individual child' s experiences and \\\"frame of reference.\\\" Ashcraft ( 1998) states that a child ' s receptive vocabulary is almost always larger than his or her expressive vocabulary, meaning that a child may understand what a particular word, in this case preposition, means but may not use it in his or her own speech. Based upon this research, results of the study can be predicted. Most of the children should understand the prepositions \\\"in\\\" and \\\"on\\\" because those prepositions are seen early in the development of language. Because \\\"under\\\" and \\\"over\\\" are other prepositions that describe topographical relations, they should be ones that are more revalent. \\\"Behind,\\\" \\\"beside,\\\" \\\"between,\\\" \\\"in front of,\\\" and \\\"next to\\\" will be the more difficult prepositions for tbe children to understand and use, so those should be less frequent in the study. Because receptive vocabulary is almost always greater than the Expressive and Receptive Language 8 expressive vocabulary, the children should understand more of the prepositions that they are able to use. Since children will gain experiences and references with age, the older children should understand and use a greater number of prepositions than the younger children. Method Participants The children who participated in this study are all enrolled at Children's World Learning Center on West End Court in Vernon Hills. Since the original experiment was to compare two-year-olds with three-year-olds, seven children of each age participated in the test. Five four-year-olds were added as an extra comparison. I wanted participation in this study to be voluntary because l felt that forcing a child to participate would hinder the results. 1 felt that the task needed to contain an element of fun in order for the child to give his or her fuU attention and therefore more accurately represent his or her knowledge. Materials A rectangular wooden block, approximately 5\\\" x 3\\\" x I\\\", and an 11.4 quart Rubbermaid bin were the two objects used in the task. L also used a table with two chairs sitting across from each other, at which l conducted the test. l created a recording sheet in which !listed the eight prepositions 1 wanted to test (in, on, beside. next to, over, under, in front of, and behind). The sheet contained a column for both receptive and expressive tasks. Procedure Expressive and Receptive Language 9 l decided to begin with the receptive task because, as noted earlier, children almost always have a larger receptive vocabulary than expressive vocabulary. Therefore, I felt that the children would be more successful at the receptive task. J chose to start the children with what would be easier for them so that J would not discourage them. Also, I felt that doi\",\"PeriodicalId\":22890,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The SAGE Encyclopedia of Human Communication Sciences and Disorders\",\"volume\":\"5 3 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The SAGE Encyclopedia of Human Communication Sciences and Disorders\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483380810.n243\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The SAGE Encyclopedia of Human Communication Sciences and Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483380810.n243","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

Ashcraft(1998)认为,双词话语的重要之处在于它们表达的是语义联系而不是句法联系;也就是说,它们表达的是思想而不是语法规则。在两个单词阶段后不久,孩子们开始创造更复杂的结构,涉及两个以上的单词,因此被称为“多单词”阶段。Moskowitz (J 978)解释说,这一时期的演讲被称为“电报式演讲”,其特点是“主要由实词组成的简短句子:语义内容丰富的词,通常是名词和动词”(97)。莫斯科维茨还解释说,演讲之所以被称为电报,是因为它以首字母开头!英语缺少虚词。然而,Ashcraft(1998)指出,正是在这个阶段,重要的语法结构开始出现,比如-ing、复数和冠词。在这个阶段接近尾声的时候,孩子们的句子听起来越来越像我们经常听到的成人句子。在两岁到四岁之间,孩子的词汇量急剧增加。根据Smith(引用自Moskowitz, 1998)的说法,在两岁时,孩子的词汇量大约由225个单词组成;到孩子四岁时,词汇量已经增加到1426个单词。这相当于增加了六倍多的单词。事实上,根据鲍尔(1998)的研究,两岁以后,幼儿的词汇量每天增加多达九个单词。莫斯科维茨(1978)认为,介词“in”和“on”通常最先出现在孩子的词汇中。事实上,根据Ashcraft(1998)的说法,这两个介词的习得出现在图形语素序列的早期,仅在现在进行时之后。它出现在复数和不规则过去时之前。Owens(1992)指出,描述地形关系的介词(“in”,“on”,'' ''under”)比描述维度空间关系的介词(“behind”,“beside”,“between”和“in front”)更容易让孩子掌握。当将介词应用于具有明显侧面的物体(如盒子)时,孩子可以更好地理解空间关系。莫斯科维茨解释说,“后面”和“前面”等介词的习得不能由年龄或发展阶段决定;这些介词的出现是孩子个人经历和“参考框架”的结果。阿什克拉夫特(1998)指出,孩子的接受性词汇量几乎总是大于他或她的表达性词汇量,这意味着孩子可能理解一个特定的词,在这种情况下介词,是什么意思,但可能不会在他或她自己的讲话中使用它。在此基础上,可以对研究结果进行预测。大多数孩子应该理解介词“in”和“on”,因为这些介词在语言发展的早期就会出现。因为“under”和“over”是其他描述地形关系的介词,它们应该是更有价值的介词。“Behind”、“beside”、“between”、“in front”和“next to”将是孩子们更难理解和使用的介词,所以这些介词在学习中应该少用。因为接受性词汇量几乎总是大于表达性词汇量和接受性词汇量,所以孩子们应该理解更多他们能够使用的介词。由于孩子们会随着年龄的增长而获得经验和参考,所以年龄较大的孩子应该比年龄较小的孩子理解和使用更多的介词。参与本研究的儿童均在位于弗农山庄西区的儿童世界学习中心注册。由于最初的实验是比较两岁和三岁的孩子,所以每个年龄段有七个孩子参加了测试。5个4岁的孩子作为额外的比较。我希望参与这项研究是自愿的,因为我觉得强迫孩子参与会影响研究结果。我觉得这个任务需要包含一些有趣的元素,这样孩子才能给予他或她充分的注意力,从而更准确地代表他或她的知识。一个长方形的木块,大约5英寸x 3英寸x 1英寸,和一个11.4夸脱的Rubbermaid垃圾桶是任务中使用的两个对象。我还用了一张桌子,上面放着两把椅子,彼此相对,我在那里进行了测试。我做了一张记录表,上面列出了我想测试的八个介词(in, on, beside)。旁边,上面,下面,前面,后面)。这张纸上有一栏是关于接受任务和表达任务的。表达性和接受性语言我决定从接受性任务开始,因为如前所述,儿童的接受性词汇量几乎总是大于表达性词汇量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Expressive and Receptive Language
Expressive and Receptive Language 3 The differences in the development of the acquisition of prepositions among two, three, and four-years olds were investigated. Acquisition was looked at both receptively and expressively. The children who were voluntarily involved in the study "played a game" by answering questions pertaining to the spatial relationship between a block and a bin. The results of the study showed that both age and the type of language were both significant factors in the number of correct responses. The study also showed that the interaction between the age and the type oflanguage was also a significant factor in the number of correct responses. The findings are consistent with the current literature. Expressive and Receptive Language 4 The Acquisition of Prepositions: Comparing the Expressive and Receptive Language of Two, Three, and Four-Year Olds The idea for my thesis developed from a class I took Spring Term of my junior year, introduction to Language and Linguistics. As an elementary education major and English-writing minor, this topic was something that I had never studied but that certainly intrigued me. Although l had spent years learning about the tremendous task of learning to read, I had never considered the question of how children learn to speak. The more I learned about language acquisition in general, the more 1 wanted to know. I have spent the last three years working at Children' s World Learning Center, a day care center in Vernon Hills. During my work there, 1 began paying closer attention to the differences in the language skills of the children and quickly discovered that these children developed at varied rates, which, of course, came as no surprise. My combined experiences lead me to the topic of my thesis-the acquisition of prepositions. r wanted my thesis to involve direct work with children. I did not want to simply read about what children do; 1 wanted to discover that for myself. I decided that I wanted to do some sort of diagnostic test with children to determine which prepositions they understood compared to which prepositions they could use. I chose to use prepositions because most other basic language develops earlier; prepositions are still emerging at this age. ln the beginning I thought that this task would involve two-yearolds. Before conducting any sort of test, I needed to do some background research. I was unable to find any journal articles written on this specific subject. I found and read articles concerning infant-directed speech, preschoolers' uses of multiple labels for objects, Expressive and Receptive Language 5 Noam Chomsky>s theories of language acquisition, and arguments to rus theories, as well as countless other topics within the field of language acquisition. 1 consulted a few textbooks and found limited infonnation. I then decided that the limited information gave me sufficient background knowledge t o conduct my test . I decided that I would compare the expressive language (the language that is produced and used in conte>.'t) with the receptive language (the language that is understood) of not only two-year-olds, but threeyear-olds as well. Eventually I added four-year-olds to the test. At trus point, I conceived of a diagnostic test in which I would utilize two objects to illustrate various spatial relationships. I consulted Kathleen Czaplewski, an Early Childhood Speech and Language Pathologist in District 203, and asked her about the test she uses. She explained the test commonly used in the field, which was similar to the test I bad developed, so I felt confident in using my test. The point of this study was simply to compare the differences between expressive and receptive language among different age groups of children. I predicted that the receptive language would be more developed in all three age groups and that the older children would have larger receptive and expressive vocabularies. I also predicted that there would be an interaction between the age and the development of both receptive and expressive language. Background Around the time of a child' s first birthday, he or she utters his or her first words. This period is .known as the .. one-word" stage, in which a child speaks using one-word sentences. Around the age of 18 months, children begin to move into what is known as the "two-word'' stage. It is in this stage that children begin to combine words to create Expressive and Receptive Language 6 sentences. The sentences are simple, using the same few patterns repeatedly. According to Brown ( 1973 ), there are eight basic constructions that are created in the two-word stage. These eight constructions are: agent + action, action + object, agent + object, action + location, entity + location, possessor + possession, entity + attribute, and demonstrative + entity. According to Ashcraft (1998), what is important about the two-word utterances is that they express semantic rather than syntactic connections; that is, they express ideas rather than syntactic rules. Soon after the two-word stage, children begin to create more complex constructions, involving more than two words, thus called the "multi-word" stage. Moskowitz ( J 978) explains that the speech of this time has been called "telegraphic speech" and is characterized by "short, simple sentences made up primarily of content words: words that are rich in semantic content, usually nouns and verbs" (97). Moskowitz also explains that the reason the speech is called telegraphic is that it initia!Jy lacks function words. However, Ashcraft ( 1998) states that it is during this stage that important syntactical structures begin to appear, such as -ing, plurals, and articles. It is near the end of this stage that children ' s sentences begin to sound more and more like the adult sentences we are used to hearing. Between the ages of two and four, a child' s vocabulary drastically increases in size. According to Smith (as cited by Moskowitz, 1998), at age two, a child' s vocabulary consists of approximately 225 words; by the time that child is four, the size of the vocabulary bas risen to 1,426 words. That is an increase of over six times as many words. In fact, according to Bower ( 1998), after age two, toddlers increase their vocabularies daily by as many as nine words. Expressive and Receptive Language 7 According to Moskowitz (1978), the prepositions ''in" and "on" are usually the first to appear in the vocabulary of a child. In fact , according to Ashcraft ( 1998), the acquisition of these two prepositions comes early on in the sequence of graphical morphemes, only after the present progressive. It comes before the acquisition of the plural and irregular past tense. Owens (1992) states that prepositions that describe a topographic relation (''in," "on,'' ''under") are easier for a child to grasp than those that describe dimensional spatial relations ("behind," "beside," "between," and "in front of'), A child can better understand spatial relationships when applied to an object with obvious sides, such as a box. Moskowitz explains that the acquisition of prepositions such as "behind" and " in front of' cannot be determined by age or stage of development; these prepositions appear as a result of an individual child' s experiences and "frame of reference." Ashcraft ( 1998) states that a child ' s receptive vocabulary is almost always larger than his or her expressive vocabulary, meaning that a child may understand what a particular word, in this case preposition, means but may not use it in his or her own speech. Based upon this research, results of the study can be predicted. Most of the children should understand the prepositions "in" and "on" because those prepositions are seen early in the development of language. Because "under" and "over" are other prepositions that describe topographical relations, they should be ones that are more revalent. "Behind," "beside," "between," "in front of," and "next to" will be the more difficult prepositions for tbe children to understand and use, so those should be less frequent in the study. Because receptive vocabulary is almost always greater than the Expressive and Receptive Language 8 expressive vocabulary, the children should understand more of the prepositions that they are able to use. Since children will gain experiences and references with age, the older children should understand and use a greater number of prepositions than the younger children. Method Participants The children who participated in this study are all enrolled at Children's World Learning Center on West End Court in Vernon Hills. Since the original experiment was to compare two-year-olds with three-year-olds, seven children of each age participated in the test. Five four-year-olds were added as an extra comparison. I wanted participation in this study to be voluntary because l felt that forcing a child to participate would hinder the results. 1 felt that the task needed to contain an element of fun in order for the child to give his or her fuU attention and therefore more accurately represent his or her knowledge. Materials A rectangular wooden block, approximately 5" x 3" x I", and an 11.4 quart Rubbermaid bin were the two objects used in the task. L also used a table with two chairs sitting across from each other, at which l conducted the test. l created a recording sheet in which !listed the eight prepositions 1 wanted to test (in, on, beside. next to, over, under, in front of, and behind). The sheet contained a column for both receptive and expressive tasks. Procedure Expressive and Receptive Language 9 l decided to begin with the receptive task because, as noted earlier, children almost always have a larger receptive vocabulary than expressive vocabulary. Therefore, I felt that the children would be more successful at the receptive task. J chose to start the children with what would be easier for them so that J would not discourage them. Also, I felt that doi
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Hearing Assistive Technology Corpus Linguistics Voice Quality Emergence and Human Communication Auditory Processing Disorder
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1