审计机关是索洛克县村财务管理的国家审计委员会

Cepalo Pub Date : 2023-03-27 DOI:10.25041/cepalo.v7no1.2814
B. Budiyono, Yusdiyanto Yusdiyanto, Irdham Riyanda
{"title":"审计机关是索洛克县村财务管理的国家审计委员会","authors":"B. Budiyono, Yusdiyanto Yusdiyanto, Irdham Riyanda","doi":"10.25041/cepalo.v7no1.2814","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Village development is one of the government's agendas in the third nawacita listed in the 2020-2014 RPJMN. Nonetheless, the uncertainty of administrative law related to institutional authority and the mechanism for examining village financial management is still a problem. BPK-RI, as the state financial examiner, has not been explicitly mandated in the package of the State Finance Law to conduct audits of the village government and village finances. This research method was carried out through normative juridical and empirical juridical analysis methods to map the inspection model needed by the village government. The analysis was carried out using the theory of state finances and the theory of state financial audits, and the theory of authority. Research suggests that in the future, an adjustment is needed between the package of Laws on State Finance to align with the package of Laws related to Villages. The results of the study concluded that the authority currently owned by BPK-RI in managing village finances has the potential for arbitrary action (willekeur) by BPK-RI and the potential to submit a lawsuit for authority against BPK-RI in the future. Meanwhile, the village government, represented by the Nagari government in Solok Regency, revealed that the audit carried out by the BPK-RI had been beneficial in encouraging improvements in the performance of the Naga government, nonrequired that the BPK-RI could focus on the SPI audit model and the performance of the Nagari government. Therefore, the ideal inspection model can be carried out through integrated auditing.","PeriodicalId":52705,"journal":{"name":"Cepalo","volume":"9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"THE AUDIT AUTHORITY THE STATE AUDIT BOARD OF THE VILLAGE FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT IN SOLOK REGENCY\",\"authors\":\"B. Budiyono, Yusdiyanto Yusdiyanto, Irdham Riyanda\",\"doi\":\"10.25041/cepalo.v7no1.2814\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Village development is one of the government's agendas in the third nawacita listed in the 2020-2014 RPJMN. Nonetheless, the uncertainty of administrative law related to institutional authority and the mechanism for examining village financial management is still a problem. BPK-RI, as the state financial examiner, has not been explicitly mandated in the package of the State Finance Law to conduct audits of the village government and village finances. This research method was carried out through normative juridical and empirical juridical analysis methods to map the inspection model needed by the village government. The analysis was carried out using the theory of state finances and the theory of state financial audits, and the theory of authority. Research suggests that in the future, an adjustment is needed between the package of Laws on State Finance to align with the package of Laws related to Villages. The results of the study concluded that the authority currently owned by BPK-RI in managing village finances has the potential for arbitrary action (willekeur) by BPK-RI and the potential to submit a lawsuit for authority against BPK-RI in the future. Meanwhile, the village government, represented by the Nagari government in Solok Regency, revealed that the audit carried out by the BPK-RI had been beneficial in encouraging improvements in the performance of the Naga government, nonrequired that the BPK-RI could focus on the SPI audit model and the performance of the Nagari government. Therefore, the ideal inspection model can be carried out through integrated auditing.\",\"PeriodicalId\":52705,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cepalo\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cepalo\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.25041/cepalo.v7no1.2814\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cepalo","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25041/cepalo.v7no1.2814","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

村庄发展是政府在2020-2014年RPJMN中列出的第三个议程之一。然而,与制度权威相关的行政法的不确定性和对村级财务管理的审查机制仍然是一个问题。BPK-RI作为国家财政审查员,在《国家财政法》的一揽子规定中没有明确规定对村政府和村财政进行审计。本研究方法通过规范的法律分析和实证的法律分析方法来映射村政府所需的检查模型。运用国家财政理论、国家财政审计理论和权威理论进行分析。研究表明,在未来,需要在国家财政法之间进行调整,以使其与农村相关法律保持一致。研究结果表明,BPK-RI目前拥有的管理村庄财政的权力有可能被BPK-RI任意采取行动(willekeur),并有可能在未来向BPK-RI提起诉讼。与此同时,以索洛克县的Nagari政府为代表的村政府透露,BPK-RI开展的审计有利于鼓励nagaga政府的绩效改善,而不要求BPK-RI可以专注于SPI审计模式和Nagari政府的绩效。因此,理想的检查模式可以通过集成审计来进行。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
THE AUDIT AUTHORITY THE STATE AUDIT BOARD OF THE VILLAGE FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT IN SOLOK REGENCY
Village development is one of the government's agendas in the third nawacita listed in the 2020-2014 RPJMN. Nonetheless, the uncertainty of administrative law related to institutional authority and the mechanism for examining village financial management is still a problem. BPK-RI, as the state financial examiner, has not been explicitly mandated in the package of the State Finance Law to conduct audits of the village government and village finances. This research method was carried out through normative juridical and empirical juridical analysis methods to map the inspection model needed by the village government. The analysis was carried out using the theory of state finances and the theory of state financial audits, and the theory of authority. Research suggests that in the future, an adjustment is needed between the package of Laws on State Finance to align with the package of Laws related to Villages. The results of the study concluded that the authority currently owned by BPK-RI in managing village finances has the potential for arbitrary action (willekeur) by BPK-RI and the potential to submit a lawsuit for authority against BPK-RI in the future. Meanwhile, the village government, represented by the Nagari government in Solok Regency, revealed that the audit carried out by the BPK-RI had been beneficial in encouraging improvements in the performance of the Naga government, nonrequired that the BPK-RI could focus on the SPI audit model and the performance of the Nagari government. Therefore, the ideal inspection model can be carried out through integrated auditing.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
2
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
RESOLVING THE PROBLEMATIC ARRANGEMENT OF THE TRIUMVIRATE AS INTERIM PRESIDENT IN INDONESIA: INSIGHTS FROM GABON AND AUSTRIA APPLICATION OF FAST-TRACK LEGISLATION METHOD IN PRESIDENTIAL SYSTEM OF GOVERNMENT IN INDONESIA POLICY AND LINGUISTIC CONSIDERATIONS IN THE PROPOSED RENAMING OF WEST JAVA PROVINCE TO TATAR SUNDA HARMONIZING INTERNATIONAL AND NATIONAL LEGAL SYSTEMS THROUGH THE PRINCIPLES OF SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT IN THE MODERN STATE PROGRESSIVE STEPS FOR PREVENTING AND HANDLING MONEY POLITICS IN INDONESIAN ELECTIONS: AN EFFORT TO REDUCE DEVIANT BEHAVIOR IN DEMOCRATIC ELECTIONS
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1