康复、公民身份和社会心理康复:巴西和美国精神卫生保健方法之间的对话

R. T. Onocko Campos, M. Costa, M. Pereira, É. Ricci, Giselli da Silva Tavares Enes, Leidy Janeth, Erazo Chávez, Graziela Reis, L. Davidson
{"title":"康复、公民身份和社会心理康复:巴西和美国精神卫生保健方法之间的对话","authors":"R. T. Onocko Campos, M. Costa, M. Pereira, É. Ricci, Giselli da Silva Tavares Enes, Leidy Janeth, Erazo Chávez, Graziela Reis, L. Davidson","doi":"10.1080/15487768.2017.1338071","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Over the past 30 years, the Brazilian psychiatric reform, based on the anti-asylum social movement and the psychosocial rehabilitation model of care, transformed radically the country’s system of mental health care. Even though tremendous gains were made, people with serious mental illness continue to have limited access to citizenship. In the United States the recovery movement has enhanced the central role of people with serious mental illness as an active and responsible agent in their recovery process, encouraging a more collaborative role for service users, but, still, there are challenges to citizenship. This article first identifies commonalities between these two movements, central to mental health advances in the two distinct cultures of Brazil and the United States. Then, though celebrating the cultural differences between the two societies, the authors consider the possibility of cross-fertilization and propose a set of suggestions that could help both countries to overcome the remaining barriers to social justice for those living with mental health issues. From the American recovery movement, the authors learn that society can and must make adaptations to allow people with mental health disorders to live as citizens regardless of the symptoms they might manifest. From Brazil, mental health workers can use solidarity as a tool to create inventive solutions for those with a mental health disorder to live as citizens, regardless of the symptoms they might manifest.","PeriodicalId":72174,"journal":{"name":"American journal of psychiatric rehabilitation","volume":"5 1","pages":"311 - 326"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"13","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Recovery, citizenship, and psychosocial rehabilitation: A dialog between Brazilian and American mental health care approaches\",\"authors\":\"R. T. Onocko Campos, M. Costa, M. Pereira, É. Ricci, Giselli da Silva Tavares Enes, Leidy Janeth, Erazo Chávez, Graziela Reis, L. Davidson\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/15487768.2017.1338071\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Over the past 30 years, the Brazilian psychiatric reform, based on the anti-asylum social movement and the psychosocial rehabilitation model of care, transformed radically the country’s system of mental health care. Even though tremendous gains were made, people with serious mental illness continue to have limited access to citizenship. In the United States the recovery movement has enhanced the central role of people with serious mental illness as an active and responsible agent in their recovery process, encouraging a more collaborative role for service users, but, still, there are challenges to citizenship. This article first identifies commonalities between these two movements, central to mental health advances in the two distinct cultures of Brazil and the United States. Then, though celebrating the cultural differences between the two societies, the authors consider the possibility of cross-fertilization and propose a set of suggestions that could help both countries to overcome the remaining barriers to social justice for those living with mental health issues. From the American recovery movement, the authors learn that society can and must make adaptations to allow people with mental health disorders to live as citizens regardless of the symptoms they might manifest. From Brazil, mental health workers can use solidarity as a tool to create inventive solutions for those with a mental health disorder to live as citizens, regardless of the symptoms they might manifest.\",\"PeriodicalId\":72174,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American journal of psychiatric rehabilitation\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"311 - 326\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-07-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"13\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American journal of psychiatric rehabilitation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/15487768.2017.1338071\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of psychiatric rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15487768.2017.1338071","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

摘要

在过去的30年里,基于反庇护社会运动和心理社会康复护理模式的巴西精神病学改革从根本上改变了该国的精神卫生保健系统。尽管取得了巨大的进展,但患有严重精神疾病的人获得公民身份的机会仍然有限。在美国,康复运动加强了严重精神疾病患者作为其康复过程中积极和负责任的代理人的核心作用,鼓励服务使用者发挥更大的协作作用,但公民身份仍然存在挑战。本文首先确定了这两个运动之间的共同点,这是巴西和美国这两个不同文化中精神卫生进步的核心。然后,尽管庆祝两个社会之间的文化差异,作者考虑了交叉受精的可能性,并提出了一系列建议,可以帮助两国克服对精神健康问题患者社会公正的剩余障碍。从美国的康复运动中,作者们了解到,社会能够而且必须做出适应,让患有精神健康障碍的人像公民一样生活,而不管他们可能表现出什么症状。在巴西,精神卫生工作者可以利用团结作为一种工具,为患有精神健康障碍的人创造创造性的解决方案,使他们能够像公民一样生活,而不管他们可能表现出什么症状。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Recovery, citizenship, and psychosocial rehabilitation: A dialog between Brazilian and American mental health care approaches
ABSTRACT Over the past 30 years, the Brazilian psychiatric reform, based on the anti-asylum social movement and the psychosocial rehabilitation model of care, transformed radically the country’s system of mental health care. Even though tremendous gains were made, people with serious mental illness continue to have limited access to citizenship. In the United States the recovery movement has enhanced the central role of people with serious mental illness as an active and responsible agent in their recovery process, encouraging a more collaborative role for service users, but, still, there are challenges to citizenship. This article first identifies commonalities between these two movements, central to mental health advances in the two distinct cultures of Brazil and the United States. Then, though celebrating the cultural differences between the two societies, the authors consider the possibility of cross-fertilization and propose a set of suggestions that could help both countries to overcome the remaining barriers to social justice for those living with mental health issues. From the American recovery movement, the authors learn that society can and must make adaptations to allow people with mental health disorders to live as citizens regardless of the symptoms they might manifest. From Brazil, mental health workers can use solidarity as a tool to create inventive solutions for those with a mental health disorder to live as citizens, regardless of the symptoms they might manifest.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Pilot Test of Using Peer Specialists to Deliver Cognitive-Behavioral Social Skills Training. Is Capability to Manage Finances Stable Over Time? Screening homeless Veterans for a voluntary money management skills training program A recovery-oriented peer provider (ROPP) work-role model and prototype measure A qualitative description of community service, business, and organization perspectives on mental illness and inclusion
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1