“他的大脑没有正常工作”:英国皇家海军“海豹”号的投降和海军中将鲁珀特·朗斯代尔(Rupert Lonsdale)的军事法庭

Q3 Arts and Humanities Journal for Maritime Research Pub Date : 2018-07-03 DOI:10.1080/21533369.2019.1602301
S. Mackenzie
{"title":"“他的大脑没有正常工作”:英国皇家海军“海豹”号的投降和海军中将鲁珀特·朗斯代尔(Rupert Lonsdale)的军事法庭","authors":"S. Mackenzie","doi":"10.1080/21533369.2019.1602301","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The post-war court-martial of Lieutenant-Commander Rupert Lonsdale, skipper of a British submarine captured at sea by the German Navy eight months into the Second World War, resulted in a full acquittal. It has been widely assumed that this trial was a pro forma exercise mounted simply in order to absolve publicly a gallant officer who had found himself in an impossible situation, the final verdict being a foregone conclusion. This was not so. Under the terms of the Naval Discipline Act then in force it was a serious offence to surrender a vessel of the Royal Navy to the enemy if it could still be defended, and the former captain had already admitted to having surrendered HMS Seal without preparing to scuttle her. Given the undisputed central facts of the case, only the introduction at trial by the defence of an unprecedented argument – that a slow build-up of carbon dioxide inside the boat over many hours while it was stuck underwater had rendered its captain mentally incompetent at a critical time – allowed the Court to side with the accused. The outcome influenced later naval disciplinary proceedings and was eventually acknowledged in changes to armed forces law in the United Kingdom.","PeriodicalId":38023,"journal":{"name":"Journal for Maritime Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"‘His brain was not working properly’: the surrender of HMS Seal and the court-martial of Lieutenant-Commander Rupert Lonsdale, RN\",\"authors\":\"S. Mackenzie\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/21533369.2019.1602301\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT The post-war court-martial of Lieutenant-Commander Rupert Lonsdale, skipper of a British submarine captured at sea by the German Navy eight months into the Second World War, resulted in a full acquittal. It has been widely assumed that this trial was a pro forma exercise mounted simply in order to absolve publicly a gallant officer who had found himself in an impossible situation, the final verdict being a foregone conclusion. This was not so. Under the terms of the Naval Discipline Act then in force it was a serious offence to surrender a vessel of the Royal Navy to the enemy if it could still be defended, and the former captain had already admitted to having surrendered HMS Seal without preparing to scuttle her. Given the undisputed central facts of the case, only the introduction at trial by the defence of an unprecedented argument – that a slow build-up of carbon dioxide inside the boat over many hours while it was stuck underwater had rendered its captain mentally incompetent at a critical time – allowed the Court to side with the accused. The outcome influenced later naval disciplinary proceedings and was eventually acknowledged in changes to armed forces law in the United Kingdom.\",\"PeriodicalId\":38023,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal for Maritime Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-07-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal for Maritime Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/21533369.2019.1602301\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal for Maritime Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21533369.2019.1602301","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

鲁珀特·朗斯代尔(Rupert Lonsdale)是一艘英国潜艇的船长,二战后8个月,他在海上被德国海军俘获。人们普遍认为,这次审判是一种形式上的做法,只是为了公开赦免一名勇敢的军官,他发现自己处于一种不可能的境地,最后的判决是预料之中的。但事实并非如此。根据当时生效的《海军纪律法案》的规定,将皇家海军的船只交给敌人是一种严重的犯罪行为,如果该船只仍有防御能力的话,这位前船长已经承认,他在没有准备击沉海豹号的情况下就交出了海豹号。鉴于本案的核心事实是无可争议的,只有辩方在审判中提出了一个前所未有的论点——当船被困在水下的几个小时里,船内二氧化碳的缓慢积聚使船长在关键时刻精神失常——才使法庭站在被告一边。这一结果影响了后来的海军纪律程序,并最终在联合王国对武装部队法的修改中得到承认。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
‘His brain was not working properly’: the surrender of HMS Seal and the court-martial of Lieutenant-Commander Rupert Lonsdale, RN
ABSTRACT The post-war court-martial of Lieutenant-Commander Rupert Lonsdale, skipper of a British submarine captured at sea by the German Navy eight months into the Second World War, resulted in a full acquittal. It has been widely assumed that this trial was a pro forma exercise mounted simply in order to absolve publicly a gallant officer who had found himself in an impossible situation, the final verdict being a foregone conclusion. This was not so. Under the terms of the Naval Discipline Act then in force it was a serious offence to surrender a vessel of the Royal Navy to the enemy if it could still be defended, and the former captain had already admitted to having surrendered HMS Seal without preparing to scuttle her. Given the undisputed central facts of the case, only the introduction at trial by the defence of an unprecedented argument – that a slow build-up of carbon dioxide inside the boat over many hours while it was stuck underwater had rendered its captain mentally incompetent at a critical time – allowed the Court to side with the accused. The outcome influenced later naval disciplinary proceedings and was eventually acknowledged in changes to armed forces law in the United Kingdom.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal for Maritime Research
Journal for Maritime Research Arts and Humanities-History
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The Journal for Maritime Research ( JMR ), established by the National Maritime Museum in 1999, focuses on historical enquiry at the intersections of maritime, British and global history. It champions a wide spectrum of innovative research on the maritime past. While the Journal has a particular focus on the British experience, it positions this within broad oceanic and international contexts, encouraging comparative perspectives and interdisciplinary approaches. The journal publishes research essays and reviews around 15-20 new books each year across a broad spectrum of maritime history. All research articles published in this journal undergo rigorous peer review, involving initial editor screening and independent assessment, normally by two anonymous referees.
期刊最新文献
Enrolment at the French Navy’s School of Advanced Studies in Paris from 1896 to 1899 South Sea Argonaut: James Colnett and the enlargement of the Pacific, 1772–1803 Suppressing piracy in the early eighteenth century: pirates, merchants and British imperial authority in the Atlantic and Indian Oceans The society of prisoners: Anglo-French wars and incarceration in the eighteenth century The British navy in the Caribbean
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1