高中转学制度下中学生学业成绩反应的教师视角

IF 0.5 Q4 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Journal of Qualitative Research in Education-Egitimde Nitel Arastirmalar Dergisi Pub Date : 2022-03-29 DOI:10.14689/enad.30.6
Burak Aydin, H. Yazıcı
{"title":"高中转学制度下中学生学业成绩反应的教师视角","authors":"Burak Aydin, H. Yazıcı","doi":"10.14689/enad.30.6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research aims to gain a better knowledge of how the LGS System, which was implemented in 2017 after the TEOG System was withdrawn, reflects student achievement. The case study pattern was used in this study, which was conducted utilizing the qualitative research approach. The criteria sampling methodology is used in this study instead of the intended sampling methods. According to this, the research's study group consisted of 12 instructors who worked in Gumushane Central secondary schools and were given questions from their majors in the new test system. As a data-gathering method, researchers devised a semi-structured interview form. A theme analysis method is used to analyze the study data. The NVivo 11 package application is used to analyze the data. According to the research results, the LGS system is able to distinguish students in the lower, middle and upper quadrants, and the children in the upper quadrants have increased their high level of intellectual talents, motivation and academic achievement. In addition, students in the lower and middle quadrics were found to have decreased motivation, achievement, and self-sufficiency judgments as a result of the system. It was also discovered that students value courses based on their question coefficients and tests. While the TEOG System is generally regarded as beneficial, the exam is memorable and does not adequately acknowledge students in terms of academic achievement, which has been identified as a drawback. The study's findings have led to recommendations for a new assessment system and central and neighbourhood placement.","PeriodicalId":41153,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Qualitative Research in Education-Egitimde Nitel Arastirmalar Dergisi","volume":"3 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Teacher Perspectives on Secondary School Students' Reactions to School Achievement in the High School Transition System\",\"authors\":\"Burak Aydin, H. Yazıcı\",\"doi\":\"10.14689/enad.30.6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This research aims to gain a better knowledge of how the LGS System, which was implemented in 2017 after the TEOG System was withdrawn, reflects student achievement. The case study pattern was used in this study, which was conducted utilizing the qualitative research approach. The criteria sampling methodology is used in this study instead of the intended sampling methods. According to this, the research's study group consisted of 12 instructors who worked in Gumushane Central secondary schools and were given questions from their majors in the new test system. As a data-gathering method, researchers devised a semi-structured interview form. A theme analysis method is used to analyze the study data. The NVivo 11 package application is used to analyze the data. According to the research results, the LGS system is able to distinguish students in the lower, middle and upper quadrants, and the children in the upper quadrants have increased their high level of intellectual talents, motivation and academic achievement. In addition, students in the lower and middle quadrics were found to have decreased motivation, achievement, and self-sufficiency judgments as a result of the system. It was also discovered that students value courses based on their question coefficients and tests. While the TEOG System is generally regarded as beneficial, the exam is memorable and does not adequately acknowledge students in terms of academic achievement, which has been identified as a drawback. The study's findings have led to recommendations for a new assessment system and central and neighbourhood placement.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41153,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Qualitative Research in Education-Egitimde Nitel Arastirmalar Dergisi\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Qualitative Research in Education-Egitimde Nitel Arastirmalar Dergisi\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14689/enad.30.6\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Qualitative Research in Education-Egitimde Nitel Arastirmalar Dergisi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14689/enad.30.6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这项研究旨在更好地了解在TEOG系统被撤销后,2017年实施的LGS系统如何反映学生的成绩。本研究采用个案研究模式,采用质性研究方法。本研究采用标准抽样方法代替预定的抽样方法。据此,研究小组由12名在九目山中央中学工作的教师组成,他们在新考试系统中收到了他们专业的问题。作为一种数据收集方法,研究人员设计了一种半结构化的访谈表格。采用主题分析法对研究数据进行分析。使用NVivo 11软件包应用程序分析数据。根据研究结果,LGS系统能够区分下、中、上象限的学生,上象限的孩子在智力天赋、动机和学业成绩方面都提高了很高的水平。此外,中低分学生的积极性、成绩和自我判断能力也因该制度而下降。研究还发现,学生对课程的评价是基于他们的问题系数和测试。虽然TEOG系统通常被认为是有益的,但考试令人难忘,并且没有充分承认学生的学术成就,这被认为是一个缺点。这项研究的结果为新的评估系统和中心和社区安置提出了建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Teacher Perspectives on Secondary School Students' Reactions to School Achievement in the High School Transition System
This research aims to gain a better knowledge of how the LGS System, which was implemented in 2017 after the TEOG System was withdrawn, reflects student achievement. The case study pattern was used in this study, which was conducted utilizing the qualitative research approach. The criteria sampling methodology is used in this study instead of the intended sampling methods. According to this, the research's study group consisted of 12 instructors who worked in Gumushane Central secondary schools and were given questions from their majors in the new test system. As a data-gathering method, researchers devised a semi-structured interview form. A theme analysis method is used to analyze the study data. The NVivo 11 package application is used to analyze the data. According to the research results, the LGS system is able to distinguish students in the lower, middle and upper quadrants, and the children in the upper quadrants have increased their high level of intellectual talents, motivation and academic achievement. In addition, students in the lower and middle quadrics were found to have decreased motivation, achievement, and self-sufficiency judgments as a result of the system. It was also discovered that students value courses based on their question coefficients and tests. While the TEOG System is generally regarded as beneficial, the exam is memorable and does not adequately acknowledge students in terms of academic achievement, which has been identified as a drawback. The study's findings have led to recommendations for a new assessment system and central and neighbourhood placement.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
44
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of Teacher's Classroom Practices in the Context of Vygotsky's Cultural-Historical Theory The Connection Between Forest School and Preschool Programs: A Comparison Study Management of Artistic Practice Pedagogies of Interdisciplinary Art Students With Critical Analysis Learning Method Online Counseling through the Eyes of University Students Uzaktan Eğitim Kapsamında İlkokul İkinci Sınıf Türkçe Dersinde Çocuklar İçin Felsefe Eğitimi
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1