{"title":"小螟虫α-淀粉酶同工酶的纯化及部分特性研究","authors":"James E. Baker","doi":"10.1016/0020-1790(91)90020-F","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>α-Amylase was purified from adults of the lesser grain borer, <em>Rhyzopertha dominica</em> (F.), by ammonium sulfate precipitation, glycogen complex formation, and gel filtration chromatography. Specific activity increased from 16 AU/mg protein in the crude extract to 705 AU/mg protein in the final sample (1 AU = 1 mg maltose hydrate/min at 30°C). Two major protein bands, active in starch zymograms, were present at <em>R</em><sub>m</sub> 0.71 and 0.79 when the sample was examined by polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE) on 7.5% gels. In addition, several minor proteins that had α-amylase activity were also present. Molecular masses of the two major allozymes were estimated to be 57 and 55 kDa under dissociating conditions. Isoelectric points of the allozymes were at pH 3.4 and 3.5. The amylases were most active at pH 7 and the presence of 20 mM NaCl resulted in a 10.7-fold increase in <em>V</em><sub>max</sub>. <em>K</em><sub>m</sub> for soluble starch was 0.127%.</p><p>Saline extracts of wheat (“Florida 302”) were 2- and 3-fold more inhibitory on a weight basis towards the amylases from <em>R. dominica</em> than were extracts prepared from two cultivars of triticale, “Morrison” and “CT-4161”, respectively. Interaction of purified α-amylase inhibitors from wheat, inhibitor-0.28 and a sample of the inhibitor-0.19 family of isoinhibitors, with the α-amylases from <em>R. dominica</em> was studied. Complex formation between the amylases and inhibitor-0.28 was demonstrated by PAGE, although the protein-protein complexes that formed were not completely stable during electrophoresis. <em>K</em><sub>i</sub> values were estimated to be 2.6 nM for inhibitor-0.28 and 2.9 nM for inhibitor-0.19. Binding of these inhibitors to α-amylases from <em>R. dominica</em> was not as tight compared with the interaction of these inhibitors with amylases from <em>Sitophilus</em> weevils and <em>Tenebrio molitor</em>.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":13955,"journal":{"name":"Insect Biochemistry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1991-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0020-1790(91)90020-F","citationCount":"70","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Purification and partial characterization of α-Amylase allozymes from the lesser grain borer, Rhyzopertha dominica\",\"authors\":\"James E. Baker\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/0020-1790(91)90020-F\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>α-Amylase was purified from adults of the lesser grain borer, <em>Rhyzopertha dominica</em> (F.), by ammonium sulfate precipitation, glycogen complex formation, and gel filtration chromatography. Specific activity increased from 16 AU/mg protein in the crude extract to 705 AU/mg protein in the final sample (1 AU = 1 mg maltose hydrate/min at 30°C). Two major protein bands, active in starch zymograms, were present at <em>R</em><sub>m</sub> 0.71 and 0.79 when the sample was examined by polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE) on 7.5% gels. In addition, several minor proteins that had α-amylase activity were also present. Molecular masses of the two major allozymes were estimated to be 57 and 55 kDa under dissociating conditions. Isoelectric points of the allozymes were at pH 3.4 and 3.5. The amylases were most active at pH 7 and the presence of 20 mM NaCl resulted in a 10.7-fold increase in <em>V</em><sub>max</sub>. <em>K</em><sub>m</sub> for soluble starch was 0.127%.</p><p>Saline extracts of wheat (“Florida 302”) were 2- and 3-fold more inhibitory on a weight basis towards the amylases from <em>R. dominica</em> than were extracts prepared from two cultivars of triticale, “Morrison” and “CT-4161”, respectively. Interaction of purified α-amylase inhibitors from wheat, inhibitor-0.28 and a sample of the inhibitor-0.19 family of isoinhibitors, with the α-amylases from <em>R. dominica</em> was studied. Complex formation between the amylases and inhibitor-0.28 was demonstrated by PAGE, although the protein-protein complexes that formed were not completely stable during electrophoresis. <em>K</em><sub>i</sub> values were estimated to be 2.6 nM for inhibitor-0.28 and 2.9 nM for inhibitor-0.19. Binding of these inhibitors to α-amylases from <em>R. dominica</em> was not as tight compared with the interaction of these inhibitors with amylases from <em>Sitophilus</em> weevils and <em>Tenebrio molitor</em>.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13955,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Insect Biochemistry\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1991-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0020-1790(91)90020-F\",\"citationCount\":\"70\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Insect Biochemistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/002017909190020F\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Insect Biochemistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/002017909190020F","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 70
摘要
采用硫酸铵沉淀法、糖原复合物形成法和凝胶过滤层析法从小螟虫(Rhyzopertha dominica)成虫中纯化α-淀粉酶。比活性从粗提物的16 AU/mg蛋白质增加到最终样品的705 AU/mg蛋白质(1 AU = 1 mg水合麦芽糖/min, 30°C)。在7.5%凝胶上用聚丙烯酰胺凝胶电泳(PAGE)检测样品时,在淀粉酶谱图上有两个主要的蛋白带,Rm为0.71和0.79。此外,还存在几种具有α-淀粉酶活性的次要蛋白。在解离条件下,两种主要同酶的分子质量估计为57和55 kDa。同工酶的等电点分别为pH 3.4和3.5。淀粉酶在pH为7时最活跃,20 mM NaCl的存在使Vmax增加了10.7倍。可溶性淀粉Km为0.127%。以重量为基础,小麦(Florida 302)盐水提取物对白僵菌淀粉酶的抑制作用分别是小黑麦品种“Morrison”和“CT-4161”提取物的2倍和3倍。研究了小麦中纯化的α-淀粉酶抑制剂inhibitor-0.28和inhibitor-0.19同效抑制剂家族样品与多米尼加红霉α-淀粉酶的相互作用。PAGE证实了在淀粉酶和抑制剂-0.28之间形成复合物,尽管在电泳过程中形成的蛋白-蛋白复合物并不完全稳定。抑制剂-0.28的Ki值估计为2.6 nM,抑制剂-0.19的Ki值估计为2.9 nM。与与象象象鼻虫和黄粉虫淀粉酶的相互作用相比,这些抑制剂与黄粉虫α-淀粉酶的结合不紧密。
Purification and partial characterization of α-Amylase allozymes from the lesser grain borer, Rhyzopertha dominica
α-Amylase was purified from adults of the lesser grain borer, Rhyzopertha dominica (F.), by ammonium sulfate precipitation, glycogen complex formation, and gel filtration chromatography. Specific activity increased from 16 AU/mg protein in the crude extract to 705 AU/mg protein in the final sample (1 AU = 1 mg maltose hydrate/min at 30°C). Two major protein bands, active in starch zymograms, were present at Rm 0.71 and 0.79 when the sample was examined by polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE) on 7.5% gels. In addition, several minor proteins that had α-amylase activity were also present. Molecular masses of the two major allozymes were estimated to be 57 and 55 kDa under dissociating conditions. Isoelectric points of the allozymes were at pH 3.4 and 3.5. The amylases were most active at pH 7 and the presence of 20 mM NaCl resulted in a 10.7-fold increase in Vmax. Km for soluble starch was 0.127%.
Saline extracts of wheat (“Florida 302”) were 2- and 3-fold more inhibitory on a weight basis towards the amylases from R. dominica than were extracts prepared from two cultivars of triticale, “Morrison” and “CT-4161”, respectively. Interaction of purified α-amylase inhibitors from wheat, inhibitor-0.28 and a sample of the inhibitor-0.19 family of isoinhibitors, with the α-amylases from R. dominica was studied. Complex formation between the amylases and inhibitor-0.28 was demonstrated by PAGE, although the protein-protein complexes that formed were not completely stable during electrophoresis. Ki values were estimated to be 2.6 nM for inhibitor-0.28 and 2.9 nM for inhibitor-0.19. Binding of these inhibitors to α-amylases from R. dominica was not as tight compared with the interaction of these inhibitors with amylases from Sitophilus weevils and Tenebrio molitor.