分包:对民法典第706条的评注

I. I. Zikun
{"title":"分包:对民法典第706条的评注","authors":"I. I. Zikun","doi":"10.24031/1992-2043-2021-21-4-130-176","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article provides a commentary to Article 706 of the Civil Code “General Contractor and Subcontractor”. The author uses the doctrine of back-to-back contracts to examine the peculiarities of the structure of contractual relations in the area of a subcontract, as well as the peculiarities of risk distribution when parties to a contractor relationship refuse from back-to-back clause. The author also investigates the peculiarities of direct claiming from an employer to a subcontractor under the doctrine of culpa in eligendo. The author concludes that if a non-contractual relationship arises, the client has the right to bring a direct claim against the subcontractor.","PeriodicalId":35992,"journal":{"name":"Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review","volume":"25 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"SUBCONTRACT: COMMENTARY TO ARTICLE 706 OF THE CIVIL CODE\",\"authors\":\"I. I. Zikun\",\"doi\":\"10.24031/1992-2043-2021-21-4-130-176\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The article provides a commentary to Article 706 of the Civil Code “General Contractor and Subcontractor”. The author uses the doctrine of back-to-back contracts to examine the peculiarities of the structure of contractual relations in the area of a subcontract, as well as the peculiarities of risk distribution when parties to a contractor relationship refuse from back-to-back clause. The author also investigates the peculiarities of direct claiming from an employer to a subcontractor under the doctrine of culpa in eligendo. The author concludes that if a non-contractual relationship arises, the client has the right to bring a direct claim against the subcontractor.\",\"PeriodicalId\":35992,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24031/1992-2043-2021-21-4-130-176\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24031/1992-2043-2021-21-4-130-176","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文对民法典第706条“总承包人和分包商”进行了评注。作者运用背靠背合同理论考察了分包合同领域合同关系结构的特殊性,以及承包商关系各方拒绝背靠背条款时风险分配的特殊性。作者还调查了雇主根据合法过失原则向分包商直接索赔的特点。作者的结论是,如果出现非合同关系,客户有权对分包商提出直接索赔。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
SUBCONTRACT: COMMENTARY TO ARTICLE 706 OF THE CIVIL CODE
The article provides a commentary to Article 706 of the Civil Code “General Contractor and Subcontractor”. The author uses the doctrine of back-to-back contracts to examine the peculiarities of the structure of contractual relations in the area of a subcontract, as well as the peculiarities of risk distribution when parties to a contractor relationship refuse from back-to-back clause. The author also investigates the peculiarities of direct claiming from an employer to a subcontractor under the doctrine of culpa in eligendo. The author concludes that if a non-contractual relationship arises, the client has the right to bring a direct claim against the subcontractor.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review (CR-CL) is the nation’s leading progressive law journal. Founded in 1966 as an instrument to advance personal freedoms and human dignities, CR-CL seeks to catalyze progressive thought and dialogue through publishing innovative legal scholarship and from various perspectives and in diverse fields of study.
期刊最新文献
ON THE IMPACT OF THE REGISTRATION SYSTEM OF THE REAL ESTATE TURNOVER THE PRICIPLES OF CIVIL LIABILITY (finale) ON THE DEFECTS OF THE DEFINITION OF THE CONCEPT “LAND PLOT” IN THE FEDERAL LAW NO. 430-FZ INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC AND PRACTICAL CONFERENCE “RECENT HISTORY OF PRIVATE LAW: TO THE 30TH ANNIVERSARY OF THE RESEARCH CENTRE” THE IMPUTATION OF HARM TO A PERSON WHO IS ECONOMICALLY EASIER TO BEAR ITS CONSEQUENCES AS AN ARGUMENT FOR SOLVING THE PROBLEM OF ALTERNATIVE CAUSATION IN TORT LAW
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1