技术压力的光明与黑暗:一项涉及医疗保健IT的混合方法研究

MIS Q. Pub Date : 2020-06-01 DOI:10.25300/MISQ/2020/14818
Christopher B. Califf, Saonee Sarker, Suprateek Sarker
{"title":"技术压力的光明与黑暗:一项涉及医疗保健IT的混合方法研究","authors":"Christopher B. Califf, Saonee Sarker, Suprateek Sarker","doi":"10.25300/MISQ/2020/14818","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Today’s healthcare workers, specifically nurses, are experiencing technostress associated with the use of healthcare information technology (HIT). Technostress is often characterized by IS researchers as negative, or as being on the “dark side” of technology. However, a broader reading of the stress literature suggests that technostress may be both positive and negative, and can therefore have a “bright side” in addition to a dark side. The objective of this study is to conceptualize a holistic technostress process that includes positive and negative components of technostress embedded in two subprocesses: the techno-eustress subprocess and the techno-distress subprocess, respectively. The study instantiates this holistic technostress model through a sequential mixed-methods research design in the context of HIT. Phase 1 of the design is a qualitative, interpretive case study involving interviews with 32 nurses. Based on the findings from the case study, the paper builds a research model that operationalizes the concepts embedded in the holistic technostress model and identifies contextually relevant challenge and hindrance technostressors and outcomes. In Phase 2, the research model is empirically validated by analyzing survey data collected from 402 nurses employed in the United States. Results reveal that several challenge and hindrance technostressors are related to positive and negative psychological responses, respectively, and that such responses are related to job satisfaction and attrition, which impact turnover intention. Contributions to theory and practice are also discussed.","PeriodicalId":18743,"journal":{"name":"MIS Q.","volume":"29 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"130","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Bright and Dark Sides of Technostress: A Mixed-Methods Study Involving Healthcare IT\",\"authors\":\"Christopher B. Califf, Saonee Sarker, Suprateek Sarker\",\"doi\":\"10.25300/MISQ/2020/14818\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Today’s healthcare workers, specifically nurses, are experiencing technostress associated with the use of healthcare information technology (HIT). Technostress is often characterized by IS researchers as negative, or as being on the “dark side” of technology. However, a broader reading of the stress literature suggests that technostress may be both positive and negative, and can therefore have a “bright side” in addition to a dark side. The objective of this study is to conceptualize a holistic technostress process that includes positive and negative components of technostress embedded in two subprocesses: the techno-eustress subprocess and the techno-distress subprocess, respectively. The study instantiates this holistic technostress model through a sequential mixed-methods research design in the context of HIT. Phase 1 of the design is a qualitative, interpretive case study involving interviews with 32 nurses. Based on the findings from the case study, the paper builds a research model that operationalizes the concepts embedded in the holistic technostress model and identifies contextually relevant challenge and hindrance technostressors and outcomes. In Phase 2, the research model is empirically validated by analyzing survey data collected from 402 nurses employed in the United States. Results reveal that several challenge and hindrance technostressors are related to positive and negative psychological responses, respectively, and that such responses are related to job satisfaction and attrition, which impact turnover intention. Contributions to theory and practice are also discussed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":18743,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"MIS Q.\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"130\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"MIS Q.\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2020/14818\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MIS Q.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2020/14818","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 130

摘要

今天的医疗工作者,特别是护士,正在经历与使用医疗信息技术(HIT)相关的技术压力。技术压力通常被is研究人员描述为消极的,或者处于技术的“黑暗面”。然而,更广泛地阅读压力文献表明,技术压力可能是积极的,也可能是消极的,因此除了黑暗的一面之外,也可能有“光明的一面”。本研究的目的是概念化一个整体的技术压力过程,该过程包括嵌入在两个子过程中的技术压力的积极和消极成分:技术-压力子过程和技术-痛苦子过程。本研究通过在HIT背景下的顺序混合方法研究设计实例化了这一整体技术压力模型。设计的第一阶段是一个定性的、解释性的案例研究,涉及对32名护士的访谈。基于案例研究的结果,本文建立了一个研究模型,该模型将嵌入在整体技术压力模型中的概念进行操作,并识别与情境相关的挑战和障碍技术压力源和结果。第二阶段,通过分析402名美国护士的调查数据,对研究模型进行实证验证。结果表明,挑战和阻碍技术压力因素分别与积极和消极的心理反应相关,并且这些心理反应与工作满意度和人员流失相关,从而影响离职倾向。对理论和实践的贡献也进行了讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Bright and Dark Sides of Technostress: A Mixed-Methods Study Involving Healthcare IT
Today’s healthcare workers, specifically nurses, are experiencing technostress associated with the use of healthcare information technology (HIT). Technostress is often characterized by IS researchers as negative, or as being on the “dark side” of technology. However, a broader reading of the stress literature suggests that technostress may be both positive and negative, and can therefore have a “bright side” in addition to a dark side. The objective of this study is to conceptualize a holistic technostress process that includes positive and negative components of technostress embedded in two subprocesses: the techno-eustress subprocess and the techno-distress subprocess, respectively. The study instantiates this holistic technostress model through a sequential mixed-methods research design in the context of HIT. Phase 1 of the design is a qualitative, interpretive case study involving interviews with 32 nurses. Based on the findings from the case study, the paper builds a research model that operationalizes the concepts embedded in the holistic technostress model and identifies contextually relevant challenge and hindrance technostressors and outcomes. In Phase 2, the research model is empirically validated by analyzing survey data collected from 402 nurses employed in the United States. Results reveal that several challenge and hindrance technostressors are related to positive and negative psychological responses, respectively, and that such responses are related to job satisfaction and attrition, which impact turnover intention. Contributions to theory and practice are also discussed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Unintended Emotional Effects of Online Health Communities: A Text Mining-Supported Empirical Study Understanding the Digital Resilience of Physicians during the COVID-19 Pandemic: An Empirical Study Putting Religious Bias in Context: How Offline and Online Contexts Shape Religious Bias in Online Prosocial Lending Exploiting Expert Knowledge for Assigning Firms to Industries: A Novel Deep Learning Method Attaining Individual Creativity and Performance in Multidisciplinary and Geographically Distributed IT Project Teams: The Role of Transactive Memory Systems
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1