门诊显微宫腔镜:为什么会失败?

Osama Salha, Majella Okeahialam, Siân Jones, Peter O'Donovan
{"title":"门诊显微宫腔镜:为什么会失败?","authors":"Osama Salha,&nbsp;Majella Okeahialam,&nbsp;Siân Jones,&nbsp;Peter O'Donovan","doi":"10.1046/j.1365-2508.2001.00405.x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Objective</p><p>To assess the failure rate of diagnostic outpatient hysteroscopy using a 2.5-mm semirigid hysteroscope.</p><p>Design</p><p>Retrospective cohort analysis.</p><p>Setting</p><p>Outpatient hysteroscopy unit in a large district general hospital.</p><p>Sample</p><p>All patients who had a diagnostic outpatient hysteroscopy during the study period.</p><p>Main outcome measures</p><p>Hysteroscopy was considered a failure when the uterine cavity was not accessible or when the view obtained was unsatisfactory.</p><p>Results</p><p>A total of 1976 patients were seen in the direct-access hysteroscopy unit between November 1994 and May 1999. The procedure was performed successfully in 1898 patients (96.1%) but failed in 78 patients (3.9%). Causes for failure included: cervical stenosis (<i>n</i> = 54; 67.9%), severe discomfort (<i>n</i> = 7; 8.9%), unsatisfactory view (<i>n</i> = 6; 2.6%), obesity (<i>n</i> = 5; 6.4%), large cervical polyp (<i>n</i> = 4; 5.1%) and vagal reaction (<i>n</i> = 2; 2.6%). Overall failure was more likely in postmenopausal (46/894; 5.1%) than in premenopausal patients (32/1082; 2.9%).</p><p>Conclusions</p><p>Diagnostic outpatient hysteroscopy using a 2.5-mm semirigid hysteroscope is a simple, safe, effective and acceptable investigation. The most common reason for a failed outpatient microhysteroscopy was cervical stenosis particularly in postmenopausal women.</p>","PeriodicalId":100599,"journal":{"name":"Gynaecological Endoscopy","volume":"10 3","pages":"167-171"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1046/j.1365-2508.2001.00405.x","citationCount":"10","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Outpatient microhysteroscopy: why does it fail?\",\"authors\":\"Osama Salha,&nbsp;Majella Okeahialam,&nbsp;Siân Jones,&nbsp;Peter O'Donovan\",\"doi\":\"10.1046/j.1365-2508.2001.00405.x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Objective</p><p>To assess the failure rate of diagnostic outpatient hysteroscopy using a 2.5-mm semirigid hysteroscope.</p><p>Design</p><p>Retrospective cohort analysis.</p><p>Setting</p><p>Outpatient hysteroscopy unit in a large district general hospital.</p><p>Sample</p><p>All patients who had a diagnostic outpatient hysteroscopy during the study period.</p><p>Main outcome measures</p><p>Hysteroscopy was considered a failure when the uterine cavity was not accessible or when the view obtained was unsatisfactory.</p><p>Results</p><p>A total of 1976 patients were seen in the direct-access hysteroscopy unit between November 1994 and May 1999. The procedure was performed successfully in 1898 patients (96.1%) but failed in 78 patients (3.9%). Causes for failure included: cervical stenosis (<i>n</i> = 54; 67.9%), severe discomfort (<i>n</i> = 7; 8.9%), unsatisfactory view (<i>n</i> = 6; 2.6%), obesity (<i>n</i> = 5; 6.4%), large cervical polyp (<i>n</i> = 4; 5.1%) and vagal reaction (<i>n</i> = 2; 2.6%). Overall failure was more likely in postmenopausal (46/894; 5.1%) than in premenopausal patients (32/1082; 2.9%).</p><p>Conclusions</p><p>Diagnostic outpatient hysteroscopy using a 2.5-mm semirigid hysteroscope is a simple, safe, effective and acceptable investigation. The most common reason for a failed outpatient microhysteroscopy was cervical stenosis particularly in postmenopausal women.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100599,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Gynaecological Endoscopy\",\"volume\":\"10 3\",\"pages\":\"167-171\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2008-06-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1046/j.1365-2508.2001.00405.x\",\"citationCount\":\"10\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Gynaecological Endoscopy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1046/j.1365-2508.2001.00405.x\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gynaecological Endoscopy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1046/j.1365-2508.2001.00405.x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

摘要

目的探讨2.5 mm半刚性宫腔镜在门诊诊断宫腔镜检查中的失败率。设计回顾性队列分析。背景:某大型区级综合医院门诊宫腔镜科室。样本:所有在研究期间接受诊断性门诊宫腔镜检查的患者。主要观察指标:子宫腔无法进入或视野不理想时,子宫镜检查失败。结果1994年11月至1999年5月在宫腔镜直接入路就诊的患者共1976例。1898例(96.1%)患者手术成功,78例(3.9%)患者手术失败。失败的原因包括:颈椎狭窄(n = 54;67.9%),严重不适(n = 7;8.9%),不满意(n = 6;2.6%)、肥胖(n = 5;6.4%),大宫颈息肉(n = 4;5.1%)和迷走神经反应(n = 2;2.6%)。绝经后患者更容易出现总体失败(46/894;5.1%)高于绝经前患者(32/1082;2.9%)。结论门诊诊断性宫腔镜采用2.5 mm半刚性宫腔镜是一种简单、安全、有效、可接受的检查方法。门诊显微宫腔镜检查失败的最常见原因是宫颈狭窄,特别是绝经后妇女。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Outpatient microhysteroscopy: why does it fail?

Objective

To assess the failure rate of diagnostic outpatient hysteroscopy using a 2.5-mm semirigid hysteroscope.

Design

Retrospective cohort analysis.

Setting

Outpatient hysteroscopy unit in a large district general hospital.

Sample

All patients who had a diagnostic outpatient hysteroscopy during the study period.

Main outcome measures

Hysteroscopy was considered a failure when the uterine cavity was not accessible or when the view obtained was unsatisfactory.

Results

A total of 1976 patients were seen in the direct-access hysteroscopy unit between November 1994 and May 1999. The procedure was performed successfully in 1898 patients (96.1%) but failed in 78 patients (3.9%). Causes for failure included: cervical stenosis (n = 54; 67.9%), severe discomfort (n = 7; 8.9%), unsatisfactory view (n = 6; 2.6%), obesity (n = 5; 6.4%), large cervical polyp (n = 4; 5.1%) and vagal reaction (n = 2; 2.6%). Overall failure was more likely in postmenopausal (46/894; 5.1%) than in premenopausal patients (32/1082; 2.9%).

Conclusions

Diagnostic outpatient hysteroscopy using a 2.5-mm semirigid hysteroscope is a simple, safe, effective and acceptable investigation. The most common reason for a failed outpatient microhysteroscopy was cervical stenosis particularly in postmenopausal women.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Microendoscopy in the operating room†: author's reply Broken needle tip in Cooper's ligament: high occurrence rate with the EndostitchTM suturing device† Ray Garry's reply to Prof. Dr Rudnicki's letter Reply to Jones Images of endometriosis: an interactive CD-ROM
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1