André Fujita, Masao Nagasaki, S. Imoto, A. Saito, Emi Ikeda, Teppei Shimamura, R. Yamaguchi, Y. Hayashizaki, S. Miyano
{"title":"CAGE、illumina芯片和实时RT-PCR基因表达谱的比较。","authors":"André Fujita, Masao Nagasaki, S. Imoto, A. Saito, Emi Ikeda, Teppei Shimamura, R. Yamaguchi, Y. Hayashizaki, S. Miyano","doi":"10.1142/9781848166585_0005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Several technologies are currently used for gene expression profiling, such as Real Time RT-PCR, microarray and CAGE (Cap Analysis of Gene Expression). CAGE is a recently developed method for constructing transcriptome maps and it has been successfully applied to analyzing gene expressions in diverse biological studies. The principle of CAGE has been developed to address specific issues such as determination of transcriptional starting sites, the study of promoter regions and identification of new transcripts. Here, we present both quantitative and qualitative comparisons among three major gene expression quantification techniques, namely: CAGE, illumina microarray and Real Time RT-PCR, by showing that the quantitative values of each method are not interchangeable, however, each of them has unique characteristics which render all of them essential and complementary. Understanding the advantages and disadvantages of each technology will be useful in selecting the most appropriate technique for a determined purpose.","PeriodicalId":73143,"journal":{"name":"Genome informatics. International Conference on Genome Informatics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of gene expression profiles produced by CAGE, illumina microarray and real time RT-PCR.\",\"authors\":\"André Fujita, Masao Nagasaki, S. Imoto, A. Saito, Emi Ikeda, Teppei Shimamura, R. Yamaguchi, Y. Hayashizaki, S. Miyano\",\"doi\":\"10.1142/9781848166585_0005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Several technologies are currently used for gene expression profiling, such as Real Time RT-PCR, microarray and CAGE (Cap Analysis of Gene Expression). CAGE is a recently developed method for constructing transcriptome maps and it has been successfully applied to analyzing gene expressions in diverse biological studies. The principle of CAGE has been developed to address specific issues such as determination of transcriptional starting sites, the study of promoter regions and identification of new transcripts. Here, we present both quantitative and qualitative comparisons among three major gene expression quantification techniques, namely: CAGE, illumina microarray and Real Time RT-PCR, by showing that the quantitative values of each method are not interchangeable, however, each of them has unique characteristics which render all of them essential and complementary. Understanding the advantages and disadvantages of each technology will be useful in selecting the most appropriate technique for a determined purpose.\",\"PeriodicalId\":73143,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Genome informatics. International Conference on Genome Informatics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Genome informatics. International Conference on Genome Informatics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1142/9781848166585_0005\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Genome informatics. International Conference on Genome Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1142/9781848166585_0005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
摘要
目前有几种技术用于基因表达谱分析,如实时RT-PCR、微阵列和CAGE(基因表达帽分析)。CAGE是最近发展起来的一种构建转录组图谱的方法,它已成功地应用于多种生物学研究中的基因表达分析。CAGE的原理已经发展到解决特定的问题,如转录起始位点的确定、启动子区域的研究和新转录物的鉴定。在这里,我们对CAGE、illumina microarray和Real Time RT-PCR这三种主要的基因表达定量技术进行了定量和定性比较,表明每种方法的定量值是不可互换的,但每种方法都有其独特的特点,使它们都是必要的和互补的。了解每种技术的优点和缺点将有助于为确定的目的选择最合适的技术。
Comparison of gene expression profiles produced by CAGE, illumina microarray and real time RT-PCR.
Several technologies are currently used for gene expression profiling, such as Real Time RT-PCR, microarray and CAGE (Cap Analysis of Gene Expression). CAGE is a recently developed method for constructing transcriptome maps and it has been successfully applied to analyzing gene expressions in diverse biological studies. The principle of CAGE has been developed to address specific issues such as determination of transcriptional starting sites, the study of promoter regions and identification of new transcripts. Here, we present both quantitative and qualitative comparisons among three major gene expression quantification techniques, namely: CAGE, illumina microarray and Real Time RT-PCR, by showing that the quantitative values of each method are not interchangeable, however, each of them has unique characteristics which render all of them essential and complementary. Understanding the advantages and disadvantages of each technology will be useful in selecting the most appropriate technique for a determined purpose.