弹性学校和挣扎学校学生的人格特征:不同的孩子或不同的学校

IF 0.7 Q4 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES Voprosy Obrazovaniya-Educational Studies Moscow Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI:10.17323/1814-9545-2021-3-33-61
Roman Zvyagintsev
{"title":"弹性学校和挣扎学校学生的人格特征:不同的孩子或不同的学校","authors":"Roman Zvyagintsev","doi":"10.17323/1814-9545-2021-3-33-61","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Roman Zvyagintsev, Junior Research Fellow, Pinsky Center of General and Extracurricular Education, National Research University Higher School of Economics; Doctoral Student, Institute of Education, National Research University Higher School of Economics. Address: Bld. 10, 16 Potapovsky Ln, 101000 Moscow, Russian Federation. E-mail: rzvyagincev@hse.ru One of the most important facets of educational inequality is the globally observed wide socioeconomic gap in academic outcomes across schools and individual students. However, there are resilient schools that manage to be effective in adverse circumstances. In order to find out what may stand behind resilience of disadvantaged schools, personality traits of their students are compared to those of students attending schools that perform low in equally challenging contexts. Empirical data for this study was collected in Leningrad Oblast in 2019 and includes information about schools’ academic outcomes and socioeconomic status (SES) as well as students’ personality traits that have been traditionally associated with psychological resilience. Personality traits are assessed using the Academic Resilience Scale (ARS‑30), the academic motivation subscale, and the grit and self-regulation scales. Factor structure of the questionnaires is verified using confirmatory factor analysis. No differences are revealed in personality traits of students between resilient and non-resilient low-SES schools, which confirms the previous findings that academic resilience is built through managerial strategies of school principals, school and state educational policies, and practices to improve school effectiveness.","PeriodicalId":54119,"journal":{"name":"Voprosy Obrazovaniya-Educational Studies Moscow","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Personality Traits of Students in Resilient and Struggling Schools: Different Children or Different Schools\",\"authors\":\"Roman Zvyagintsev\",\"doi\":\"10.17323/1814-9545-2021-3-33-61\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Roman Zvyagintsev, Junior Research Fellow, Pinsky Center of General and Extracurricular Education, National Research University Higher School of Economics; Doctoral Student, Institute of Education, National Research University Higher School of Economics. Address: Bld. 10, 16 Potapovsky Ln, 101000 Moscow, Russian Federation. E-mail: rzvyagincev@hse.ru One of the most important facets of educational inequality is the globally observed wide socioeconomic gap in academic outcomes across schools and individual students. However, there are resilient schools that manage to be effective in adverse circumstances. In order to find out what may stand behind resilience of disadvantaged schools, personality traits of their students are compared to those of students attending schools that perform low in equally challenging contexts. Empirical data for this study was collected in Leningrad Oblast in 2019 and includes information about schools’ academic outcomes and socioeconomic status (SES) as well as students’ personality traits that have been traditionally associated with psychological resilience. Personality traits are assessed using the Academic Resilience Scale (ARS‑30), the academic motivation subscale, and the grit and self-regulation scales. Factor structure of the questionnaires is verified using confirmatory factor analysis. No differences are revealed in personality traits of students between resilient and non-resilient low-SES schools, which confirms the previous findings that academic resilience is built through managerial strategies of school principals, school and state educational policies, and practices to improve school effectiveness.\",\"PeriodicalId\":54119,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Voprosy Obrazovaniya-Educational Studies Moscow\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Voprosy Obrazovaniya-Educational Studies Moscow\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17323/1814-9545-2021-3-33-61\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Voprosy Obrazovaniya-Educational Studies Moscow","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17323/1814-9545-2021-3-33-61","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

罗曼·兹维亚金采夫,国立研究型大学高等经济学院普通教育与课外教育平斯基中心初级研究员;国立高等经济学院教育研究所博士生。地址:俄罗斯联邦莫斯科101000波波波夫斯基路16号10座。E-mail: rzvyagincev@hse.ru教育不平等的一个最重要的方面是全球范围内观察到的学校和学生个体在学业成绩上的广泛社会经济差距。然而,也有一些有弹性的学校在不利的环境中设法发挥作用。为了找出弱势学校恢复力背后的原因,研究人员将弱势学校学生的个性特征与那些在同样具有挑战性的环境中表现较差的学校学生的个性特征进行了比较。该研究的实证数据于2019年在列宁格勒州收集,包括有关学校学业成绩和社会经济地位(SES)的信息,以及传统上与心理弹性相关的学生人格特征。人格特质的评估采用学业弹性量表(ARS - 30)、学业动机子量表以及毅力和自我调节量表。采用验证性因子分析对问卷的因子结构进行验证。低社会经济地位学校学生的人格特质在弹性学校和非弹性学校之间没有差异,这证实了先前的研究结果,即学业弹性是通过学校校长的管理策略、学校和国家的教育政策以及提高学校有效性的实践来建立的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Personality Traits of Students in Resilient and Struggling Schools: Different Children or Different Schools
Roman Zvyagintsev, Junior Research Fellow, Pinsky Center of General and Extracurricular Education, National Research University Higher School of Economics; Doctoral Student, Institute of Education, National Research University Higher School of Economics. Address: Bld. 10, 16 Potapovsky Ln, 101000 Moscow, Russian Federation. E-mail: rzvyagincev@hse.ru One of the most important facets of educational inequality is the globally observed wide socioeconomic gap in academic outcomes across schools and individual students. However, there are resilient schools that manage to be effective in adverse circumstances. In order to find out what may stand behind resilience of disadvantaged schools, personality traits of their students are compared to those of students attending schools that perform low in equally challenging contexts. Empirical data for this study was collected in Leningrad Oblast in 2019 and includes information about schools’ academic outcomes and socioeconomic status (SES) as well as students’ personality traits that have been traditionally associated with psychological resilience. Personality traits are assessed using the Academic Resilience Scale (ARS‑30), the academic motivation subscale, and the grit and self-regulation scales. Factor structure of the questionnaires is verified using confirmatory factor analysis. No differences are revealed in personality traits of students between resilient and non-resilient low-SES schools, which confirms the previous findings that academic resilience is built through managerial strategies of school principals, school and state educational policies, and practices to improve school effectiveness.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Voprosy Obrazovaniya-Educational Studies Moscow
Voprosy Obrazovaniya-Educational Studies Moscow EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES-
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
42.90%
发文量
23
期刊最新文献
Power of Probability in Psychometrics. Review of the book “Bayesian Psychometric Modeling“ The Role of Context in Scenario-Based Tasks for Measuring Universal Skills: The Use of Generalizability Theory Experience of Using Bifactor Models to Reduce the Effects of Social Desirability on the Normative Questionnaire of Universal Competencies Psychometric Research: Modern Methods and New Opportunities for Education Psychometrics and Cognitive Research: Contradictions and Possibility for Cooperation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1