探索消费者对净零政策的偏好:在不同的未来贴现假设下,英国公民为国家温室气体减排目标的支付意愿

IF 2.3 4区 经济学 0 ECONOMICS Climate Change Economics Pub Date : 2022-08-19 DOI:10.1142/s2010007823500070
R. Lawton, D. Fujiwara
{"title":"探索消费者对净零政策的偏好:在不同的未来贴现假设下,英国公民为国家温室气体减排目标的支付意愿","authors":"R. Lawton, D. Fujiwara","doi":"10.1142/s2010007823500070","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Following the UK's hosting of the United Nations Convention of the Parties Climate Summit in 2021, political targets for reducing greenhouse gas emissions - \"Net-Zero\" - have gained momentum. We address the gap in how public preferences are accounted for in climate decision-making by applying Contingent-Valuation techniques which ask people to state their Willingness-to-Pay (WTP) for the UK's 2050 Net-Zero target. Mean WTP is 37.57 pound/household to support Net-Zero (median 11.25) pound, with a present-value of 2.3 pound billion across UK households. While younger people are more likely to experience the long-term impacts of climate change, older generations are willing to pay more to support it, suggesting that public support for Net-Zero is largely based on \"nonuse\" benefits, rather than direct \"use\" benefits to oneself. The COVID-19 epidemic affected WTP bids in a quarter of respondents. Finally, we explore how choice of positive or normative discount rate affects policy conclusions when monetizing consumer preferences.","PeriodicalId":45922,"journal":{"name":"Climate Change Economics","volume":"24 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring consumer preferences for Net-Zero policies: Willingness to Pay of UK citizens for national greenhouse gas reduction targets under different future discounting assumptions\",\"authors\":\"R. Lawton, D. Fujiwara\",\"doi\":\"10.1142/s2010007823500070\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Following the UK's hosting of the United Nations Convention of the Parties Climate Summit in 2021, political targets for reducing greenhouse gas emissions - \\\"Net-Zero\\\" - have gained momentum. We address the gap in how public preferences are accounted for in climate decision-making by applying Contingent-Valuation techniques which ask people to state their Willingness-to-Pay (WTP) for the UK's 2050 Net-Zero target. Mean WTP is 37.57 pound/household to support Net-Zero (median 11.25) pound, with a present-value of 2.3 pound billion across UK households. While younger people are more likely to experience the long-term impacts of climate change, older generations are willing to pay more to support it, suggesting that public support for Net-Zero is largely based on \\\"nonuse\\\" benefits, rather than direct \\\"use\\\" benefits to oneself. The COVID-19 epidemic affected WTP bids in a quarter of respondents. Finally, we explore how choice of positive or normative discount rate affects policy conclusions when monetizing consumer preferences.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45922,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Climate Change Economics\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Climate Change Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1142/s2010007823500070\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Climate Change Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1142/s2010007823500070","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

继英国于2021年主办《联合国气候变化框架公约》气候峰会后,减少温室气体排放的政治目标“净零排放”势头强劲。我们通过应用条件评估技术来解决公众偏好如何在气候决策中被考虑的差距,该技术要求人们陈述他们对英国2050年净零目标的支付意愿(WTP)。平均WTP为37.57英镑/户,以支持净零(中位数11.25英镑)英镑,英国家庭的现值为23亿英镑。虽然年轻人更有可能体验到气候变化的长期影响,但老一辈人愿意付出更多的钱来支持它,这表明公众对净零的支持主要是基于“不使用”的好处,而不是直接的“使用”给自己带来的好处。在四分之一的受访者中,COVID-19疫情影响了WTP投标。最后,我们探讨了当消费者偏好货币化时,正贴现率或规范贴现率的选择如何影响政策结论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Exploring consumer preferences for Net-Zero policies: Willingness to Pay of UK citizens for national greenhouse gas reduction targets under different future discounting assumptions
Following the UK's hosting of the United Nations Convention of the Parties Climate Summit in 2021, political targets for reducing greenhouse gas emissions - "Net-Zero" - have gained momentum. We address the gap in how public preferences are accounted for in climate decision-making by applying Contingent-Valuation techniques which ask people to state their Willingness-to-Pay (WTP) for the UK's 2050 Net-Zero target. Mean WTP is 37.57 pound/household to support Net-Zero (median 11.25) pound, with a present-value of 2.3 pound billion across UK households. While younger people are more likely to experience the long-term impacts of climate change, older generations are willing to pay more to support it, suggesting that public support for Net-Zero is largely based on "nonuse" benefits, rather than direct "use" benefits to oneself. The COVID-19 epidemic affected WTP bids in a quarter of respondents. Finally, we explore how choice of positive or normative discount rate affects policy conclusions when monetizing consumer preferences.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
17.40%
发文量
36
期刊介绍: Climate Change Economics (CCE) publishes theoretical and empirical papers devoted to analyses of mitigation, adaptation, impacts, and other issues related to the policy and management of greenhouse gases. CCE is specifically devoted to papers in economics although it is understood that authors may need to rely on other fields for important insights. The journal is interested in papers examining the issue at every scale from local to global and papers from around the world are encouraged. CCE is also interested in both original research and review papers and welcomes comments discussing previous articles.
期刊最新文献
The Fairness Controversy over CBAM and its policy implications Climate change, adaptation, and economic outcomes: evidence from agriculture in india Do High Temperatures Dampen Chinese Urban Household Consumption? When climate changes, so does violence: Examining the link between weather and crime in Pernambuco–Northeast, Brazil The policy effect of carbon emissions trading on green technology innovation---evidence from manufacturing enterprises in China
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1