M. Mazumder, Homayra Tahseen Hossain, T. Chowdhury, Ishrat Binte Reza, Quazi Audry Arafat, H. Ahasan
{"title":"孟加拉国第一波和第二波COVID-19感染患者的感染和结局:一项基于医院的比较研究","authors":"M. Mazumder, Homayra Tahseen Hossain, T. Chowdhury, Ishrat Binte Reza, Quazi Audry Arafat, H. Ahasan","doi":"10.18203/2349-3933.ijam20232204","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: COVID-19 emerged as one of the worst pandemics in human history in December 2019. Despite a relatively low infection rate in Bangladesh for seven weeks from mid-January, there were still 287 deaths in February, marking the lowest monthly death toll since May 2020. This study aimed to analyze the infection and outcomes of COVID-19 patients during the first and second waves in Bangladesh.\nMethods: This cross-sectional observational comparative study conducted at the Popular medical college hospital, 190 COVID patients were enrolled during the first wave (Mid-June to Mid-August 2020), and 179 COVID patients were enrolled during the second wave (Mid-March to Mid-April 21).\nResult: Mean age was 52.85±15.36 years in the first wave and 55.42±14.20 years in the second wave (p=0.097). Male patients predominated in both waves (p=0.082). Common symptoms, such as fever, cough, and respiratory distress, were similar. The second wave had a higher percentage of patients with diabetes. CRP levels increased in the first wave, while D-dimer levels were higher in the second wave. HRCT reports indicated minimal COVID-19 involvement. Most patients were discharged, with a small percentage referred to higher centers, and the mortality rate was not significant (p=0.600).\nConclusions: The study highlights the differences in various factors related to COVID-19 between the first and second waves of COVID-19 in Bangladesh. Although the demographic status was similar in both waves, it provides valuable insights for medical consultations.","PeriodicalId":13827,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Advances in Medicine","volume":"205 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Infection and outcome of COVID-19 affected patients during 1st and 2nd waves in Bangladesh: a hospital based comparative study\",\"authors\":\"M. Mazumder, Homayra Tahseen Hossain, T. Chowdhury, Ishrat Binte Reza, Quazi Audry Arafat, H. Ahasan\",\"doi\":\"10.18203/2349-3933.ijam20232204\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: COVID-19 emerged as one of the worst pandemics in human history in December 2019. Despite a relatively low infection rate in Bangladesh for seven weeks from mid-January, there were still 287 deaths in February, marking the lowest monthly death toll since May 2020. This study aimed to analyze the infection and outcomes of COVID-19 patients during the first and second waves in Bangladesh.\\nMethods: This cross-sectional observational comparative study conducted at the Popular medical college hospital, 190 COVID patients were enrolled during the first wave (Mid-June to Mid-August 2020), and 179 COVID patients were enrolled during the second wave (Mid-March to Mid-April 21).\\nResult: Mean age was 52.85±15.36 years in the first wave and 55.42±14.20 years in the second wave (p=0.097). Male patients predominated in both waves (p=0.082). Common symptoms, such as fever, cough, and respiratory distress, were similar. The second wave had a higher percentage of patients with diabetes. CRP levels increased in the first wave, while D-dimer levels were higher in the second wave. HRCT reports indicated minimal COVID-19 involvement. Most patients were discharged, with a small percentage referred to higher centers, and the mortality rate was not significant (p=0.600).\\nConclusions: The study highlights the differences in various factors related to COVID-19 between the first and second waves of COVID-19 in Bangladesh. Although the demographic status was similar in both waves, it provides valuable insights for medical consultations.\",\"PeriodicalId\":13827,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Advances in Medicine\",\"volume\":\"205 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Advances in Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-3933.ijam20232204\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Advances in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-3933.ijam20232204","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Infection and outcome of COVID-19 affected patients during 1st and 2nd waves in Bangladesh: a hospital based comparative study
Background: COVID-19 emerged as one of the worst pandemics in human history in December 2019. Despite a relatively low infection rate in Bangladesh for seven weeks from mid-January, there were still 287 deaths in February, marking the lowest monthly death toll since May 2020. This study aimed to analyze the infection and outcomes of COVID-19 patients during the first and second waves in Bangladesh.
Methods: This cross-sectional observational comparative study conducted at the Popular medical college hospital, 190 COVID patients were enrolled during the first wave (Mid-June to Mid-August 2020), and 179 COVID patients were enrolled during the second wave (Mid-March to Mid-April 21).
Result: Mean age was 52.85±15.36 years in the first wave and 55.42±14.20 years in the second wave (p=0.097). Male patients predominated in both waves (p=0.082). Common symptoms, such as fever, cough, and respiratory distress, were similar. The second wave had a higher percentage of patients with diabetes. CRP levels increased in the first wave, while D-dimer levels were higher in the second wave. HRCT reports indicated minimal COVID-19 involvement. Most patients were discharged, with a small percentage referred to higher centers, and the mortality rate was not significant (p=0.600).
Conclusions: The study highlights the differences in various factors related to COVID-19 between the first and second waves of COVID-19 in Bangladesh. Although the demographic status was similar in both waves, it provides valuable insights for medical consultations.