调查中实地方法的比较

IF 16.4 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Accounts of Chemical Research Pub Date : 2017-01-01 DOI:10.5477/cis/reis.158.137
Vidal Díaz de Rada, J. A. Álvarez
{"title":"调查中实地方法的比较","authors":"Vidal Díaz de Rada, J. A. Álvarez","doi":"10.5477/cis/reis.158.137","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"espanolEn este trabajo se presentan los resultados de una investigacion a poblacion general que utiliza conjuntamente una encuesta por correo postal, una encuesta telefonica y una encuesta a traves de Internet. La muestra objeto de estudio recibe la invitaciona cooperar mediante una comunicacion por correo, y es el propio seleccionado el que decide como responder. La nota analiza la calidad de la respuesta (considerando el numero de no respuestas), el tiempo necesario para llevar a cabo el trabajo de campo y el coste de la recogida de informacion. Los resultados desvelan que la realizacion de encuestas via web reducen el tiempo del trabajo de campo, consiguen menor respuesta parcial y presentan un coste ligeramente superior a la encuesta realizada por correo. Ahora bien, la diferente estructura de costes de cada una permite concluir que de haber obtenido el total de los cuestionarios online, la reduccion de costes hubiera supuesto un 18,2%. EnglishThis paper presents the results of a mixed-mode survey of the general population using a combination of postal, telephone, and Internet survey protocols. Potential respondents were invited to participate by ordinary mail and were allowed to choose their preferred response mode. The paper focuses on response quality (taking non-responses into consideration), fieldwork time and data collection cost. The results reveal that the Internet survey produces the lowest rate of non-responses and requires significantly less fieldwork time, although it is slightly more costly than the postal survey. However, when differences in cost structure are taken into account, we find that the same number of completed questionnaires could have been obtained through the Internet alone at a cost that is 18.2% lower than the mixed-mode survey.","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparación de métodos de campo en la encuesta\",\"authors\":\"Vidal Díaz de Rada, J. A. Álvarez\",\"doi\":\"10.5477/cis/reis.158.137\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"espanolEn este trabajo se presentan los resultados de una investigacion a poblacion general que utiliza conjuntamente una encuesta por correo postal, una encuesta telefonica y una encuesta a traves de Internet. La muestra objeto de estudio recibe la invitaciona cooperar mediante una comunicacion por correo, y es el propio seleccionado el que decide como responder. La nota analiza la calidad de la respuesta (considerando el numero de no respuestas), el tiempo necesario para llevar a cabo el trabajo de campo y el coste de la recogida de informacion. Los resultados desvelan que la realizacion de encuestas via web reducen el tiempo del trabajo de campo, consiguen menor respuesta parcial y presentan un coste ligeramente superior a la encuesta realizada por correo. Ahora bien, la diferente estructura de costes de cada una permite concluir que de haber obtenido el total de los cuestionarios online, la reduccion de costes hubiera supuesto un 18,2%. EnglishThis paper presents the results of a mixed-mode survey of the general population using a combination of postal, telephone, and Internet survey protocols. Potential respondents were invited to participate by ordinary mail and were allowed to choose their preferred response mode. The paper focuses on response quality (taking non-responses into consideration), fieldwork time and data collection cost. The results reveal that the Internet survey produces the lowest rate of non-responses and requires significantly less fieldwork time, although it is slightly more costly than the postal survey. However, when differences in cost structure are taken into account, we find that the same number of completed questionnaires could have been obtained through the Internet alone at a cost that is 18.2% lower than the mixed-mode survey.\",\"PeriodicalId\":1,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":16.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5477/cis/reis.158.137\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5477/cis/reis.158.137","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

本文介绍了一项针对普通人群的调查结果,该调查结合了邮政调查、电话调查和互联网调查。研究对象的样本通过邮件交流收到合作邀请,被选中的样本决定如何回应。该说明分析了响应的质量(考虑到无响应的数量)、进行实地工作所需的时间和收集信息的成本。研究结果表明,网络调查比邮件调查减少了实地工作的时间,获得的部分回答更少,成本略高于邮件调查。然而,不同的成本结构使我们得出结论,如果获得所有在线问卷,成本将减少18.2%。本文结合邮政、电话和互联网调查协议,对一般人口进行了混合模式调查。通过普通邮件邀请潜在的答复者参加,并允许他们选择自己喜欢的答复方式。本文的重点是响应质量(考虑无响应)、现场工作时间和数据收集成本。结果表明,互联网调查产生的无回应率最低,需要的实地工作时间也大大减少,尽管它的成本略高于邮政调查。但是,当考虑到成本结构的差异时,我们发现可以通过互联网单独获得相同数量的完整问卷,成本比混合模式调查低18.2%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparación de métodos de campo en la encuesta
espanolEn este trabajo se presentan los resultados de una investigacion a poblacion general que utiliza conjuntamente una encuesta por correo postal, una encuesta telefonica y una encuesta a traves de Internet. La muestra objeto de estudio recibe la invitaciona cooperar mediante una comunicacion por correo, y es el propio seleccionado el que decide como responder. La nota analiza la calidad de la respuesta (considerando el numero de no respuestas), el tiempo necesario para llevar a cabo el trabajo de campo y el coste de la recogida de informacion. Los resultados desvelan que la realizacion de encuestas via web reducen el tiempo del trabajo de campo, consiguen menor respuesta parcial y presentan un coste ligeramente superior a la encuesta realizada por correo. Ahora bien, la diferente estructura de costes de cada una permite concluir que de haber obtenido el total de los cuestionarios online, la reduccion de costes hubiera supuesto un 18,2%. EnglishThis paper presents the results of a mixed-mode survey of the general population using a combination of postal, telephone, and Internet survey protocols. Potential respondents were invited to participate by ordinary mail and were allowed to choose their preferred response mode. The paper focuses on response quality (taking non-responses into consideration), fieldwork time and data collection cost. The results reveal that the Internet survey produces the lowest rate of non-responses and requires significantly less fieldwork time, although it is slightly more costly than the postal survey. However, when differences in cost structure are taken into account, we find that the same number of completed questionnaires could have been obtained through the Internet alone at a cost that is 18.2% lower than the mixed-mode survey.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Accounts of Chemical Research
Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
31.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
312
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
期刊最新文献
Intentions to move abroad among medical students: a cross-sectional study to investigate determinants and opinions. Analysis of Medical Rehabilitation Needs of 2023 Kahramanmaraş Earthquake Victims: Adıyaman Example. Efficacy of whole body vibration on fascicle length and joint angle in children with hemiplegic cerebral palsy. The change process questionnaire (CPQ): A psychometric validation. Clinical Practice Guidelines on Palliative Sedation Around the World: A Systematic Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1