估算数据驱动的冠状病毒疾病 2019 年缓解策略,促进大学安全复课。

IF 0.1 2区 文学 0 LITERATURE, ROMANCE HISPANIC REVIEW Pub Date : 2022-03-01 Epub Date: 2022-03-14 DOI:10.1098/rsif.2021.0920
Qihui Yang, Don M Gruenbacher, Caterina M Scoglio
{"title":"估算数据驱动的冠状病毒疾病 2019 年缓解策略,促进大学安全复课。","authors":"Qihui Yang, Don M Gruenbacher, Caterina M Scoglio","doi":"10.1098/rsif.2021.0920","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>After one pandemic year of remote or hybrid instructional modes, universities struggled with plans for an in-person autumn (fall) semester in 2021. To help inform university reopening policies, we collected survey data on social contact patterns and developed an agent-based model to simulate the spread of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 in university settings. Considering a reproduction number of <i>R</i><sub>0</sub> = 3 and 70% immunization effectiveness, we estimated that at least 80% of the university population immunized through natural infection or vaccination is needed for safe university reopening with relaxed non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs). By contrast, at least 60% of the university population immunized through natural infection or vaccination is needed for safe university reopening when NPIs are adopted. Nevertheless, attention needs to be paid to large-gathering events that could lead to infection size spikes. At an immunization coverage of 70%, continuing NPIs, such as wearing masks, could lead to a 78.39% reduction in the maximum cumulative infections and a 67.59% reduction in the median cumulative infections. However, even though this reduction is very beneficial, there is still a possibility of non-negligible size outbreaks because the maximum cumulative infection size is equal to 1.61% of the population, which is substantial.</p>","PeriodicalId":44625,"journal":{"name":"HISPANIC REVIEW","volume":"71 1","pages":"20210920"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8919707/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Estimating data-driven coronavirus disease 2019 mitigation strategies for safe university reopening.\",\"authors\":\"Qihui Yang, Don M Gruenbacher, Caterina M Scoglio\",\"doi\":\"10.1098/rsif.2021.0920\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>After one pandemic year of remote or hybrid instructional modes, universities struggled with plans for an in-person autumn (fall) semester in 2021. To help inform university reopening policies, we collected survey data on social contact patterns and developed an agent-based model to simulate the spread of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 in university settings. Considering a reproduction number of <i>R</i><sub>0</sub> = 3 and 70% immunization effectiveness, we estimated that at least 80% of the university population immunized through natural infection or vaccination is needed for safe university reopening with relaxed non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs). By contrast, at least 60% of the university population immunized through natural infection or vaccination is needed for safe university reopening when NPIs are adopted. Nevertheless, attention needs to be paid to large-gathering events that could lead to infection size spikes. At an immunization coverage of 70%, continuing NPIs, such as wearing masks, could lead to a 78.39% reduction in the maximum cumulative infections and a 67.59% reduction in the median cumulative infections. However, even though this reduction is very beneficial, there is still a possibility of non-negligible size outbreaks because the maximum cumulative infection size is equal to 1.61% of the population, which is substantial.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":44625,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"HISPANIC REVIEW\",\"volume\":\"71 1\",\"pages\":\"20210920\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8919707/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"HISPANIC REVIEW\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"103\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2021.0920\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/3/14 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LITERATURE, ROMANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"HISPANIC REVIEW","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2021.0920","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/3/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE, ROMANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在经历了一年的远程或混合教学模式大流行之后,各大学都在为 2021 年秋季学期的面对面教学计划而苦苦挣扎。为了帮助大学制定重新开放政策,我们收集了有关社会接触模式的调查数据,并开发了一个基于代理的模型来模拟严重急性呼吸系统综合征冠状病毒 2 在大学环境中的传播。考虑到 R0 = 3 的繁殖数量和 70% 的免疫效果,我们估计至少需要 80% 的大学人口通过自然感染或接种疫苗获得免疫,才能在放松非药物干预措施 (NPI) 的情况下安全地重新开放大学。相比之下,如果采用非药物干预措施,则至少需要 60% 的大学人口通过自然感染或接种疫苗获得免疫接种,大学才能安全重新开学。尽管如此,仍需注意可能导致感染规模激增的大型集会活动。在免疫接种覆盖率为 70% 的情况下,继续采取非感染性措施(如佩戴口罩)可使最大累积感染率降低 78.39%,中位累积感染率降低 67.59%。然而,尽管这种减少非常有益,但仍有可能爆发不可忽略的规模,因为最大累积感染规模相当于人口的 1.61%,这是一个相当大的数字。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Estimating data-driven coronavirus disease 2019 mitigation strategies for safe university reopening.

After one pandemic year of remote or hybrid instructional modes, universities struggled with plans for an in-person autumn (fall) semester in 2021. To help inform university reopening policies, we collected survey data on social contact patterns and developed an agent-based model to simulate the spread of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 in university settings. Considering a reproduction number of R0 = 3 and 70% immunization effectiveness, we estimated that at least 80% of the university population immunized through natural infection or vaccination is needed for safe university reopening with relaxed non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs). By contrast, at least 60% of the university population immunized through natural infection or vaccination is needed for safe university reopening when NPIs are adopted. Nevertheless, attention needs to be paid to large-gathering events that could lead to infection size spikes. At an immunization coverage of 70%, continuing NPIs, such as wearing masks, could lead to a 78.39% reduction in the maximum cumulative infections and a 67.59% reduction in the median cumulative infections. However, even though this reduction is very beneficial, there is still a possibility of non-negligible size outbreaks because the maximum cumulative infection size is equal to 1.61% of the population, which is substantial.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
HISPANIC REVIEW
HISPANIC REVIEW LITERATURE, ROMANCE-
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
期刊介绍: A quarterly journal devoted to research in Hispanic and Luso-Brazilian literatures and cultures, Hispanic Review has been edited since 1933 by the Department of Romance Languages at the University of Pennsylvania. The journal features essays and book reviews on the diverse cultural manifestations of Iberia and Latin America, from the medieval period to the present.
期刊最新文献
Can elbow arthroscopic posterior portals damage the anconeus nerve? A cadaveric study. Negociaciones con el ruido del convento de San Jerónimo: efectos de la acústica en la vida y obra de sor Juana Inés de la Cruz Damn the Suit and the Tailor Who Made It: Power Struggle between the Narrator and the Editor in Nuevas coplas y cantares del temible bardo Eudomóndaro Higuera alias el Tuerto El mito del monarca de dos caras: metapoesía e historia en Luis Cernuda An Epidemic of Apathy: Abulia and the Language of Pathology in Baroja’s Early Fiction
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1