内镜鼻窦手术中控制性低血压:异丙酚和硫酸镁的比较

N. Mageed
{"title":"内镜鼻窦手术中控制性低血压:异丙酚和硫酸镁的比较","authors":"N. Mageed","doi":"10.33552/ASOAJ.2020.02.000536","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: Controlled hypotension is considered as an effective technique for reducing blood loss and optimizing the surgical field. This study was designed to compare intravenous infusion of propofol and magnesium sulfate for achieving controlled hypotension during elective endoscopic sinus surgery. Methods: This randomized, double blinded, comparative study was conducted on fifty patients of either sex, aged between 18 and 45 years old underwent elective endoscopic sinus surgery. Patients were randomly categorized into two equal groups (25 patients each). Propofol group: patients were received intravenous infusion 75 mcg/kg/min of propofol for the first 15 minutes post induction and then a maintenance infusion of propofol (50 mcg/kg/min). Magnesium group: before induction of anesthesia, magnesium sulfate intravenous infusion was started at 40 mg/ kg in 100 ml saline over 10 minutes as a loading dose then magnesium sulfate infusion of 167 mcg/kg/min during surgery. Perioperative mean arterial blood pressure and heart rate were recorded. The intra-operative surgical field assessment and surgeon satisfaction score were assessed. The recovery profile was assessed by Ramsay sedation score and modified Aldrete score. Postoperative complications in the terms of postoperative nausea and vomiting and shivering were also recorded. significantly decreased in propofol group at 15, 30, 45, 60 and 75 minutes after induction when compared to magnesium group. However, perioperative heart rate showed no significant changes between both studied groups. No statistical changes between the two studied groups as regard surgeon satisfaction and bleeding scores. Nitroglycerine doses were significantly higher in magnesium group than propofol group (P value<0.001). Postoperative Ramsay sedation scores were statistically significant higher, and the recovery time was significantly longer in magnesium group compared to propofol group (P value <0.001). Postoperatively shivering was significantly higher in propofol group compared to magnesium group while nausea and vomiting showed no significant changes between both groups. Conclusion: This study concluded that intravenous infusion of propofol provided easily controlled hypotension, while intravenous infusion of magnesium sulfate was associated with a better recovery profile and reducing the incidence of postoperative shivering.","PeriodicalId":92982,"journal":{"name":"Anaesthesia & surgery open access journal","volume":"27 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Controlled Hypotension During Endoscopic Sinus Surgery: A Comparison of Propofol and Magnesium Sulfate\",\"authors\":\"N. Mageed\",\"doi\":\"10.33552/ASOAJ.2020.02.000536\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: Controlled hypotension is considered as an effective technique for reducing blood loss and optimizing the surgical field. This study was designed to compare intravenous infusion of propofol and magnesium sulfate for achieving controlled hypotension during elective endoscopic sinus surgery. Methods: This randomized, double blinded, comparative study was conducted on fifty patients of either sex, aged between 18 and 45 years old underwent elective endoscopic sinus surgery. Patients were randomly categorized into two equal groups (25 patients each). Propofol group: patients were received intravenous infusion 75 mcg/kg/min of propofol for the first 15 minutes post induction and then a maintenance infusion of propofol (50 mcg/kg/min). Magnesium group: before induction of anesthesia, magnesium sulfate intravenous infusion was started at 40 mg/ kg in 100 ml saline over 10 minutes as a loading dose then magnesium sulfate infusion of 167 mcg/kg/min during surgery. Perioperative mean arterial blood pressure and heart rate were recorded. The intra-operative surgical field assessment and surgeon satisfaction score were assessed. The recovery profile was assessed by Ramsay sedation score and modified Aldrete score. Postoperative complications in the terms of postoperative nausea and vomiting and shivering were also recorded. significantly decreased in propofol group at 15, 30, 45, 60 and 75 minutes after induction when compared to magnesium group. However, perioperative heart rate showed no significant changes between both studied groups. No statistical changes between the two studied groups as regard surgeon satisfaction and bleeding scores. Nitroglycerine doses were significantly higher in magnesium group than propofol group (P value<0.001). Postoperative Ramsay sedation scores were statistically significant higher, and the recovery time was significantly longer in magnesium group compared to propofol group (P value <0.001). Postoperatively shivering was significantly higher in propofol group compared to magnesium group while nausea and vomiting showed no significant changes between both groups. Conclusion: This study concluded that intravenous infusion of propofol provided easily controlled hypotension, while intravenous infusion of magnesium sulfate was associated with a better recovery profile and reducing the incidence of postoperative shivering.\",\"PeriodicalId\":92982,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Anaesthesia & surgery open access journal\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-10-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Anaesthesia & surgery open access journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33552/ASOAJ.2020.02.000536\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anaesthesia & surgery open access journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33552/ASOAJ.2020.02.000536","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:控制性低血压被认为是减少失血量和优化手术视野的有效技术。本研究旨在比较静脉输注异丙酚和硫酸镁在选择性内镜鼻窦手术中实现可控低血压的效果。方法:随机、双盲、比较研究对50例年龄在18 - 45岁的择期内镜鼻窦手术患者进行了研究。患者随机分为两组(每组25例)。异丙酚组:诱导后15分钟静脉滴注异丙酚75 mcg/kg/min,随后维持输注异丙酚50 mcg/kg/min。镁组:麻醉诱导前,在100 ml生理盐水中以40 mg/ kg的剂量静脉滴注硫酸镁,加载剂量为10分钟,术中以167 mcg/kg/min的剂量静脉滴注硫酸镁。记录围手术期平均动脉血压和心率。评估术中手术野区评估和外科医生满意度。采用Ramsay镇静评分和改良Aldrete评分评估恢复情况。术后恶心、呕吐、寒战等并发症也有记录。与镁组相比,异丙酚组在诱导后15、30、45、60和75分钟显著降低。然而,两组围手术期心率无明显变化。两组在外科医生满意度和出血评分方面无统计学差异。镁组硝酸甘油剂量显著高于异丙酚组(P值<0.001)。术后Ramsay镇静评分高于异丙酚组,恢复时间明显长于镁组(P值<0.001)。异丙酚组术后寒战明显高于镁组,恶心呕吐无明显变化。结论:静脉输注异丙酚可提供易于控制的低血压,而静脉输注硫酸镁可获得更好的恢复情况并减少术后寒战的发生率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Controlled Hypotension During Endoscopic Sinus Surgery: A Comparison of Propofol and Magnesium Sulfate
Objective: Controlled hypotension is considered as an effective technique for reducing blood loss and optimizing the surgical field. This study was designed to compare intravenous infusion of propofol and magnesium sulfate for achieving controlled hypotension during elective endoscopic sinus surgery. Methods: This randomized, double blinded, comparative study was conducted on fifty patients of either sex, aged between 18 and 45 years old underwent elective endoscopic sinus surgery. Patients were randomly categorized into two equal groups (25 patients each). Propofol group: patients were received intravenous infusion 75 mcg/kg/min of propofol for the first 15 minutes post induction and then a maintenance infusion of propofol (50 mcg/kg/min). Magnesium group: before induction of anesthesia, magnesium sulfate intravenous infusion was started at 40 mg/ kg in 100 ml saline over 10 minutes as a loading dose then magnesium sulfate infusion of 167 mcg/kg/min during surgery. Perioperative mean arterial blood pressure and heart rate were recorded. The intra-operative surgical field assessment and surgeon satisfaction score were assessed. The recovery profile was assessed by Ramsay sedation score and modified Aldrete score. Postoperative complications in the terms of postoperative nausea and vomiting and shivering were also recorded. significantly decreased in propofol group at 15, 30, 45, 60 and 75 minutes after induction when compared to magnesium group. However, perioperative heart rate showed no significant changes between both studied groups. No statistical changes between the two studied groups as regard surgeon satisfaction and bleeding scores. Nitroglycerine doses were significantly higher in magnesium group than propofol group (P value<0.001). Postoperative Ramsay sedation scores were statistically significant higher, and the recovery time was significantly longer in magnesium group compared to propofol group (P value <0.001). Postoperatively shivering was significantly higher in propofol group compared to magnesium group while nausea and vomiting showed no significant changes between both groups. Conclusion: This study concluded that intravenous infusion of propofol provided easily controlled hypotension, while intravenous infusion of magnesium sulfate was associated with a better recovery profile and reducing the incidence of postoperative shivering.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Endoscopic Endotracheal Intubation for ERCP In the Era of COVID: An Approach To Minimize Risk of Transmission of Infectious Diseases Saphenous Nerve Block to the Adductor Canal and IPACK Block In Analgesic Management of Knee Replacements: Our Experience Intralesional Bleomycin Sclerotherapy in Children with Lymphangiomas: A Review Article Consideration of Nebulized Lidocaine For Treatment of Covid19 Severity Via Targeting Neutrophil Extracellular Traps Cecal Volvulus Caused by an Omphalo-Mesenteric Band: A Case Report of a Rare Complication of Meckel’s Diverticulum
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1