非洲2型糖尿病人群客观测量体力活动与疾病控制参数的关系

Muhammad Abid Siddiqui, S. Bhana, R. Daya
{"title":"非洲2型糖尿病人群客观测量体力活动与疾病控制参数的关系","authors":"Muhammad Abid Siddiqui, S. Bhana, R. Daya","doi":"10.1080/16089677.2018.1515144","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The incidence of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is increasing rapidly. This is possibly due to increasing obesity, reduced level of activity, sedentary lifestyle, ageing population and industrialisation. Aim: The primary objective of this study was to ascertain the level of activity using a pedometer. The secondary objectives were: (1) to correlate the baseline level of activity with body mass index (BMI), HbA1c and blood pressure (BP), (2) to assess whether 7 000 steps a day influence HbA1c and BP over a three-month period. Method: A total of 110 patients were screened; 95 patients (n = 95) completed the study. At the first visit HbA1c, BMI and BP were measured. At the end of the first month baseline physical activity was recorded using pedometers. Patients were divided into two groups: active (n = 50) and control (n = 45). Patients in the active group were asked to walk a minimum of 7 000 steps/day. The control group were asked to continue their usual activity. These patients were followed up monthly over a period of three months. At each visit BMI, BP and step counts were recorded. HbA1c was measured only at the first and last visit. Result: Activity levels increased significantly in the active group throughout the study. Mean step count for the control group at baseline was 2 923.1 ± 1 136.9, which increased to 3 431.2 ± 1 251.7 by the end of the study. Mean step count for the active group at baseline was 4 609.9 ± 1 702.1, which increased to 7 244.8 ± 1 419.4 by the end of the study. The difference between control and active group was statistically significant (p < 0.001). Systolic and diastolic BP decreased significantly in both groups (p = 0.017) for systolic BP and (p = 0.002) for diastolic BP but no interaction was found between the groups as systolic and diastolic BP decreased at the same rate over time in both groups. HbA1c decreased by 1.04% in the active group; this difference was statistically highly significant (p < 0.001). Conclusion: Increase in activity levels decreases HbA1c by 1.04 percentage point over three months in T2DM (p < 0.001), which is statistically significant.","PeriodicalId":43919,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Endocrinology Metabolism and Diabetes of South Africa","volume":"1 1","pages":"80 - 85"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The relationship between objectively measured physical activity and parameters of disease control in an African population of type 2 diabetes mellitus\",\"authors\":\"Muhammad Abid Siddiqui, S. Bhana, R. Daya\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/16089677.2018.1515144\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: The incidence of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is increasing rapidly. This is possibly due to increasing obesity, reduced level of activity, sedentary lifestyle, ageing population and industrialisation. Aim: The primary objective of this study was to ascertain the level of activity using a pedometer. The secondary objectives were: (1) to correlate the baseline level of activity with body mass index (BMI), HbA1c and blood pressure (BP), (2) to assess whether 7 000 steps a day influence HbA1c and BP over a three-month period. Method: A total of 110 patients were screened; 95 patients (n = 95) completed the study. At the first visit HbA1c, BMI and BP were measured. At the end of the first month baseline physical activity was recorded using pedometers. Patients were divided into two groups: active (n = 50) and control (n = 45). Patients in the active group were asked to walk a minimum of 7 000 steps/day. The control group were asked to continue their usual activity. These patients were followed up monthly over a period of three months. At each visit BMI, BP and step counts were recorded. HbA1c was measured only at the first and last visit. Result: Activity levels increased significantly in the active group throughout the study. Mean step count for the control group at baseline was 2 923.1 ± 1 136.9, which increased to 3 431.2 ± 1 251.7 by the end of the study. Mean step count for the active group at baseline was 4 609.9 ± 1 702.1, which increased to 7 244.8 ± 1 419.4 by the end of the study. The difference between control and active group was statistically significant (p < 0.001). Systolic and diastolic BP decreased significantly in both groups (p = 0.017) for systolic BP and (p = 0.002) for diastolic BP but no interaction was found between the groups as systolic and diastolic BP decreased at the same rate over time in both groups. HbA1c decreased by 1.04% in the active group; this difference was statistically highly significant (p < 0.001). Conclusion: Increase in activity levels decreases HbA1c by 1.04 percentage point over three months in T2DM (p < 0.001), which is statistically significant.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43919,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Endocrinology Metabolism and Diabetes of South Africa\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"80 - 85\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-09-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Endocrinology Metabolism and Diabetes of South Africa\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/16089677.2018.1515144\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Endocrinology Metabolism and Diabetes of South Africa","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/16089677.2018.1515144","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

背景:2型糖尿病(T2DM)的发病率正在迅速上升。这可能是由于肥胖增加、活动水平降低、久坐不动的生活方式、人口老龄化和工业化。目的:本研究的主要目的是使用计步器确定活动水平。次要目标是:(1)将基线活动水平与体重指数(BMI)、糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)和血压(BP)联系起来;(2)评估在三个月的时间里,每天7 000步是否会影响糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)和血压。方法:共筛选110例患者;95例患者(n = 95)完成了研究。首次就诊时测量HbA1c、BMI和BP。在第一个月结束时,使用计步器记录基线体力活动。患者分为两组:活动组(n = 50)和对照组(n = 45)。活动组的患者被要求每天至少步行7000步。对照组被要求继续他们平常的活动。这些患者每月随访三个月。每次就诊时均记录BMI、BP和步数。仅在第一次和最后一次就诊时测量HbA1c。结果:在整个研究过程中,运动组的活动水平显著增加。对照组基线时平均步数为2 923.1±1 136.9,研究结束时增加到3 431.2±1 251.7。运动组在基线时的平均步数为4 609.9±1 702.1,研究结束时增加到7 244.8±1 419.4。对照组与治疗组比较,差异有统计学意义(p < 0.001)。两组的收缩压和舒张压均显著降低(p = 0.017),舒张压显著降低(p = 0.002),但两组间未发现相互作用,两组的收缩压和舒张压随时间降低的速率相同。活性组HbA1c降低1.04%;这一差异具有高度统计学意义(p < 0.001)。结论:活动水平升高可使T2DM患者HbA1c在3个月内降低1.04个百分点(p < 0.001),差异有统计学意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The relationship between objectively measured physical activity and parameters of disease control in an African population of type 2 diabetes mellitus
Background: The incidence of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is increasing rapidly. This is possibly due to increasing obesity, reduced level of activity, sedentary lifestyle, ageing population and industrialisation. Aim: The primary objective of this study was to ascertain the level of activity using a pedometer. The secondary objectives were: (1) to correlate the baseline level of activity with body mass index (BMI), HbA1c and blood pressure (BP), (2) to assess whether 7 000 steps a day influence HbA1c and BP over a three-month period. Method: A total of 110 patients were screened; 95 patients (n = 95) completed the study. At the first visit HbA1c, BMI and BP were measured. At the end of the first month baseline physical activity was recorded using pedometers. Patients were divided into two groups: active (n = 50) and control (n = 45). Patients in the active group were asked to walk a minimum of 7 000 steps/day. The control group were asked to continue their usual activity. These patients were followed up monthly over a period of three months. At each visit BMI, BP and step counts were recorded. HbA1c was measured only at the first and last visit. Result: Activity levels increased significantly in the active group throughout the study. Mean step count for the control group at baseline was 2 923.1 ± 1 136.9, which increased to 3 431.2 ± 1 251.7 by the end of the study. Mean step count for the active group at baseline was 4 609.9 ± 1 702.1, which increased to 7 244.8 ± 1 419.4 by the end of the study. The difference between control and active group was statistically significant (p < 0.001). Systolic and diastolic BP decreased significantly in both groups (p = 0.017) for systolic BP and (p = 0.002) for diastolic BP but no interaction was found between the groups as systolic and diastolic BP decreased at the same rate over time in both groups. HbA1c decreased by 1.04% in the active group; this difference was statistically highly significant (p < 0.001). Conclusion: Increase in activity levels decreases HbA1c by 1.04 percentage point over three months in T2DM (p < 0.001), which is statistically significant.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
20.00%
发文量
15
期刊最新文献
Cardiorenal effects of SGLT2 inhibitors: who might benefit? MRI brain findings in patients with depression and type 2 diabetes – a scoping review Tobacco use in diabetes mellitus: a retrospective cohort study to determine the effect of snuff tobacco use on diabetes mellitus complications over a period of nine years Effect of an educational intervention based on the Theory of Planned Behaviour in type 2 diabetic patients at a foot and eye care practice Relevance and therapeutic implication of macroprolactinemia detection using PEG 6000 in women of childbearing age with hyperprolactinemia: experience at a tertiary hospital
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1