{"title":"欧洲人权法院与国有实体:法学的参与与发展","authors":"Mihaela-Maria Barnes","doi":"10.1163/15718034-12341478","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nThe article analyses the jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) concerning State-owned entities (SOE s) in the following areas: standing, the criteria for determining the nature and status of an entity, the positive obligations of States in the context of SOE s, the attribution of acts and omissions of SOE s to the State for the purpose of State responsibility, the liability of States for the debts of SOE s and the obligations of the State to promptly enforce decisions against SOE s. The aim of the article is to uncover the main issues that the ECtHR has had to consider when dealing with SOE s: whether the approach taken by the Court is consistent over time; whether and where applicable the Court’s approach is consistent with, or departs from, general international law; and what are the main principles that can be ascertained from this case law.","PeriodicalId":42613,"journal":{"name":"Law & Practice of International Courts and Tribunals","volume":"69 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The European Court of Human Rights and State-Owned Entities: Engagement and Development of a Jurisprudence Constante\",\"authors\":\"Mihaela-Maria Barnes\",\"doi\":\"10.1163/15718034-12341478\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nThe article analyses the jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) concerning State-owned entities (SOE s) in the following areas: standing, the criteria for determining the nature and status of an entity, the positive obligations of States in the context of SOE s, the attribution of acts and omissions of SOE s to the State for the purpose of State responsibility, the liability of States for the debts of SOE s and the obligations of the State to promptly enforce decisions against SOE s. The aim of the article is to uncover the main issues that the ECtHR has had to consider when dealing with SOE s: whether the approach taken by the Court is consistent over time; whether and where applicable the Court’s approach is consistent with, or departs from, general international law; and what are the main principles that can be ascertained from this case law.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42613,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Law & Practice of International Courts and Tribunals\",\"volume\":\"69 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Law & Practice of International Courts and Tribunals\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1163/15718034-12341478\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Law & Practice of International Courts and Tribunals","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/15718034-12341478","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
The European Court of Human Rights and State-Owned Entities: Engagement and Development of a Jurisprudence Constante
The article analyses the jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) concerning State-owned entities (SOE s) in the following areas: standing, the criteria for determining the nature and status of an entity, the positive obligations of States in the context of SOE s, the attribution of acts and omissions of SOE s to the State for the purpose of State responsibility, the liability of States for the debts of SOE s and the obligations of the State to promptly enforce decisions against SOE s. The aim of the article is to uncover the main issues that the ECtHR has had to consider when dealing with SOE s: whether the approach taken by the Court is consistent over time; whether and where applicable the Court’s approach is consistent with, or departs from, general international law; and what are the main principles that can be ascertained from this case law.
期刊介绍:
The Law and Practice of International Courts and Tribunals is firmly established as the leading journal in its field. Each issue will give you the latest developments with respect to the preparation, adoption, suspension, amendment and revision of Rules of Procedure as well as statutory and internal rules and other related matters. The Journal will also provide you with the latest practice with respect to the interpretation and application of rules of procedure and constitutional documents, which can be found in judgments, advisory opinions, written and oral pleadings as well as legal literature.