克服困难建立联系:项目工作者与无家可归者的关系

IF 0.8 Q3 URBAN STUDIES Housing Care and Support Pub Date : 2019-06-03 DOI:10.1108/HCS-10-2018-0030
Clare S Watson, Lizette Nolte, Rachel Brown
{"title":"克服困难建立联系:项目工作者与无家可归者的关系","authors":"Clare S Watson, Lizette Nolte, Rachel Brown","doi":"10.1108/HCS-10-2018-0030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nTrusting and empathic relationships between project workers and people experiencing homelessness (PEH) form the cornerstone for their needs to be met. However, under the UK austerity agenda project workers practice in a context of increasing pressure and limited resources; with relationships often characterised by conditionality and disconnection. The purpose of this paper is to report on a study investigating project workers’ experiences of building relationships with PEH living in supported housing projects.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nA qualitative design was employed in which focus groups were carried out in six projects, using an opportunity sample of 22 project workers. Data were analysed using thematic analysis, within a social constructionist epistemology.\n\n\nFindings\nThree main themes were identified: “Working hard to build connection”, “Supporting each other within an unsupportive context” and “Draining but sustaining”. Project workers acted out of strong value systems in building relationships with residents against a backdrop of systemic disconnection.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nClear clinical implications are put forward with in a Psychologically Informed Environment framework. Services supporting PEH need to be psychologically informed and organisations need to embed reflection within their policies and every day practice. In developing services for PEH interdependence not in/dependence needs to be the aim. Finally, the responsibility for improving the lives of PEH should be placed back on society to provide a context in which PEH can thrive.\n","PeriodicalId":43302,"journal":{"name":"Housing Care and Support","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Building connection against the odds: project workers relationships with people experiencing homelessness\",\"authors\":\"Clare S Watson, Lizette Nolte, Rachel Brown\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/HCS-10-2018-0030\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nPurpose\\nTrusting and empathic relationships between project workers and people experiencing homelessness (PEH) form the cornerstone for their needs to be met. However, under the UK austerity agenda project workers practice in a context of increasing pressure and limited resources; with relationships often characterised by conditionality and disconnection. The purpose of this paper is to report on a study investigating project workers’ experiences of building relationships with PEH living in supported housing projects.\\n\\n\\nDesign/methodology/approach\\nA qualitative design was employed in which focus groups were carried out in six projects, using an opportunity sample of 22 project workers. Data were analysed using thematic analysis, within a social constructionist epistemology.\\n\\n\\nFindings\\nThree main themes were identified: “Working hard to build connection”, “Supporting each other within an unsupportive context” and “Draining but sustaining”. Project workers acted out of strong value systems in building relationships with residents against a backdrop of systemic disconnection.\\n\\n\\nOriginality/value\\nClear clinical implications are put forward with in a Psychologically Informed Environment framework. Services supporting PEH need to be psychologically informed and organisations need to embed reflection within their policies and every day practice. In developing services for PEH interdependence not in/dependence needs to be the aim. Finally, the responsibility for improving the lives of PEH should be placed back on society to provide a context in which PEH can thrive.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":43302,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Housing Care and Support\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-06-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Housing Care and Support\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/HCS-10-2018-0030\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"URBAN STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Housing Care and Support","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/HCS-10-2018-0030","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"URBAN STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

目的项目工作者和无家可归者(PEH)之间的信任和共情关系是满足他们需求的基石。然而,在英国紧缩议程下,项目工人在压力不断增加和资源有限的背景下进行实践;这种关系通常以条件限制和脱节为特征。本文的目的是报告一项研究,调查项目工人在支持住房项目中与PEH建立关系的经历。设计/方法/方法采用定性设计,在六个项目中进行焦点小组,使用22个项目工作人员的机会样本。数据分析使用专题分析,在社会建构主义认识论。调查结果确定了三个主要主题:“努力建立联系”、“在不相互支持的情况下相互支持”和“消耗但持续”。项目工作者在与居民建立关系的过程中,表现出强烈的价值体系,而背景是系统性的脱节。原创性/价值在心理知情环境框架下提出了明确的临床意义。支持PEH的服务需要了解心理,组织需要在其政策和日常实践中嵌入反思。在为PEH开发服务时,需要以相互依赖而不是依赖为目标。最后,改善PEH生活的责任应该回归到社会,为PEH的发展提供一个良好的环境。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Building connection against the odds: project workers relationships with people experiencing homelessness
Purpose Trusting and empathic relationships between project workers and people experiencing homelessness (PEH) form the cornerstone for their needs to be met. However, under the UK austerity agenda project workers practice in a context of increasing pressure and limited resources; with relationships often characterised by conditionality and disconnection. The purpose of this paper is to report on a study investigating project workers’ experiences of building relationships with PEH living in supported housing projects. Design/methodology/approach A qualitative design was employed in which focus groups were carried out in six projects, using an opportunity sample of 22 project workers. Data were analysed using thematic analysis, within a social constructionist epistemology. Findings Three main themes were identified: “Working hard to build connection”, “Supporting each other within an unsupportive context” and “Draining but sustaining”. Project workers acted out of strong value systems in building relationships with residents against a backdrop of systemic disconnection. Originality/value Clear clinical implications are put forward with in a Psychologically Informed Environment framework. Services supporting PEH need to be psychologically informed and organisations need to embed reflection within their policies and every day practice. In developing services for PEH interdependence not in/dependence needs to be the aim. Finally, the responsibility for improving the lives of PEH should be placed back on society to provide a context in which PEH can thrive.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Housing Care and Support
Housing Care and Support URBAN STUDIES-
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
13
期刊最新文献
Social housing development: a case study in Bac Ninh province, Vietnam Reviewing the affordability and adequacy of affordable housing in urban India: Impact of the covid-19 pandemic Filling in the gaps: examining the prevalence of Black homelessness in Canada Advantages and challenges of extra care housing in the UK for people living with dementia: a scoping review Choosing invisibility? Exploring service (dis)engagement of women experiencing multiple disadvantage
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1