股市表现与经济哲学:做多奥巴马(需求侧)做空特朗普(供给侧)

Yosef Bonaparte
{"title":"股市表现与经济哲学:做多奥巴马(需求侧)做空特朗普(供给侧)","authors":"Yosef Bonaparte","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3430696","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper compares the stock market (S&P) performance during presidents Trump and Obama. The comparison is interesting since Obama employed a stimulus plan (demand side) while Trump employed a tax cut (supply side). We use the inauguration date as the benchmark start till analyses day 7/7/2019; first 662 days. The S&P performance during President Obama (first 622 trading days) is 59.1% while the S&P performance during President Trump is only 32.5%. As for volatility, during the entire 2 terms of Obama presidency, the Dow never lost 1000 points or more in a day, while in the first 2 years of Trump presidency Dow lost twice 1000 points or more in a day. Also, during the first 622 days of Trump presidency, the Dow lost 500 and 400 points or more in a day about 16 and 25 times, respectively; almost three times more than the entire president’s Obama 2 terms presidency. With regard to drop of the unemployment rate, which is lagging policy by 3 quarters, during president Obama the unemployment rate went down by 1% (from 10% down to 9%), while during president Trump from 4.1% to 3.6%. Thus, we conclude that the demand side beats the supply side in this round.","PeriodicalId":11757,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Other Microeconomics: General Equilibrium & Disequilibrium Models of Financial Markets (Topic)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Stock Market Performance and Economic Philosophy: Long Obama (Demand Side) Short Trump (Supply Side)\",\"authors\":\"Yosef Bonaparte\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3430696\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper compares the stock market (S&P) performance during presidents Trump and Obama. The comparison is interesting since Obama employed a stimulus plan (demand side) while Trump employed a tax cut (supply side). We use the inauguration date as the benchmark start till analyses day 7/7/2019; first 662 days. The S&P performance during President Obama (first 622 trading days) is 59.1% while the S&P performance during President Trump is only 32.5%. As for volatility, during the entire 2 terms of Obama presidency, the Dow never lost 1000 points or more in a day, while in the first 2 years of Trump presidency Dow lost twice 1000 points or more in a day. Also, during the first 622 days of Trump presidency, the Dow lost 500 and 400 points or more in a day about 16 and 25 times, respectively; almost three times more than the entire president’s Obama 2 terms presidency. With regard to drop of the unemployment rate, which is lagging policy by 3 quarters, during president Obama the unemployment rate went down by 1% (from 10% down to 9%), while during president Trump from 4.1% to 3.6%. Thus, we conclude that the demand side beats the supply side in this round.\",\"PeriodicalId\":11757,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ERN: Other Microeconomics: General Equilibrium & Disequilibrium Models of Financial Markets (Topic)\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-07-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ERN: Other Microeconomics: General Equilibrium & Disequilibrium Models of Financial Markets (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3430696\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: Other Microeconomics: General Equilibrium & Disequilibrium Models of Financial Markets (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3430696","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本文比较了特朗普总统和奥巴马总统任期内股市的表现。这种比较很有趣,因为奥巴马采取了刺激计划(需求侧),而特朗普采取了减税(供给侧)。我们以就职日期为基准开始,直到分析日7/7/2019;前662天。标准普尔500指数在奥巴马总统任期内(前622个交易日)的表现为59.1%,而特朗普总统任期内的表现仅为32.5%。在波动性方面,在奥巴马的整个两届总统任期内,道琼斯指数从未在一天内下跌1000点以上,而在特朗普总统任期的前两年,道琼斯指数在一天内下跌了两次1000点以上。此外,在特朗普担任总统的头622天里,道琼斯指数分别有16次和25次在一天内下跌500点和400点以上;几乎是奥巴马整个总统任期的三倍。失业率的下降滞后于政策三个季度,在奥巴马总统任期内,失业率下降了1%(从10%下降到9%),而在特朗普总统任期内,失业率从4.1%下降到3.6%。因此,我们得出结论,在这一轮中,需求方击败了供给方。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Stock Market Performance and Economic Philosophy: Long Obama (Demand Side) Short Trump (Supply Side)
This paper compares the stock market (S&P) performance during presidents Trump and Obama. The comparison is interesting since Obama employed a stimulus plan (demand side) while Trump employed a tax cut (supply side). We use the inauguration date as the benchmark start till analyses day 7/7/2019; first 662 days. The S&P performance during President Obama (first 622 trading days) is 59.1% while the S&P performance during President Trump is only 32.5%. As for volatility, during the entire 2 terms of Obama presidency, the Dow never lost 1000 points or more in a day, while in the first 2 years of Trump presidency Dow lost twice 1000 points or more in a day. Also, during the first 622 days of Trump presidency, the Dow lost 500 and 400 points or more in a day about 16 and 25 times, respectively; almost three times more than the entire president’s Obama 2 terms presidency. With regard to drop of the unemployment rate, which is lagging policy by 3 quarters, during president Obama the unemployment rate went down by 1% (from 10% down to 9%), while during president Trump from 4.1% to 3.6%. Thus, we conclude that the demand side beats the supply side in this round.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Order-flow-based Leading Indicators of Short-term Liquidity Shortfalls An Equilibrium Model of Career Concerns, Investment Horizons, and Mutual Fund Value Added Information, Market Power and Welfare Stock Liquidity and Algorithmic Market Making During the COVID-19 Crisis Financial Information and Diverging Beliefs
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1