{"title":"测定鞋的防滑性的试验方法的国际比较","authors":"K. Jung, H. Schenk","doi":"10.1016/0376-6349(90)90034-S","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Co-operative tests were conducted by a working group of the “foot protection” ISO standardizing committee, with the participation of seven countries, using a total of 10 different testing methods for determining shoe anti-slip characteristics.</p><p>The friction coefficients, cof, thereby obtained were processed and condensed for statistical evaluation. Ten testing methods were compared, grouped into six testing machine variants, two sole-section methods and two test-person methods.</p><p>There are significant inter-relationships between the results of the various testing machines. This is especially true for the steel/glycerine floor/lubricant combination, for which a significant inter-relationship was shown between all testing machines.</p><p>No general relationship can be determined between the both sole-section methods on the one hand, and the testing machines on the other.</p><p>There are strong indications of a relationship between the test-person methods and the testing machines.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100816,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Occupational Accidents","volume":"13 4","pages":"Pages 271-290"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1990-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0376-6349(90)90034-S","citationCount":"19","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An international comparison of test methods for determining the slip resistance of shoes\",\"authors\":\"K. Jung, H. Schenk\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/0376-6349(90)90034-S\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Co-operative tests were conducted by a working group of the “foot protection” ISO standardizing committee, with the participation of seven countries, using a total of 10 different testing methods for determining shoe anti-slip characteristics.</p><p>The friction coefficients, cof, thereby obtained were processed and condensed for statistical evaluation. Ten testing methods were compared, grouped into six testing machine variants, two sole-section methods and two test-person methods.</p><p>There are significant inter-relationships between the results of the various testing machines. This is especially true for the steel/glycerine floor/lubricant combination, for which a significant inter-relationship was shown between all testing machines.</p><p>No general relationship can be determined between the both sole-section methods on the one hand, and the testing machines on the other.</p><p>There are strong indications of a relationship between the test-person methods and the testing machines.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100816,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Occupational Accidents\",\"volume\":\"13 4\",\"pages\":\"Pages 271-290\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1990-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0376-6349(90)90034-S\",\"citationCount\":\"19\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Occupational Accidents\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/037663499090034S\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Occupational Accidents","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/037663499090034S","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
An international comparison of test methods for determining the slip resistance of shoes
Co-operative tests were conducted by a working group of the “foot protection” ISO standardizing committee, with the participation of seven countries, using a total of 10 different testing methods for determining shoe anti-slip characteristics.
The friction coefficients, cof, thereby obtained were processed and condensed for statistical evaluation. Ten testing methods were compared, grouped into six testing machine variants, two sole-section methods and two test-person methods.
There are significant inter-relationships between the results of the various testing machines. This is especially true for the steel/glycerine floor/lubricant combination, for which a significant inter-relationship was shown between all testing machines.
No general relationship can be determined between the both sole-section methods on the one hand, and the testing machines on the other.
There are strong indications of a relationship between the test-person methods and the testing machines.