全国辅导员使用五种项目评估的调查

C. Peterson, K. Schmid, René Kososki
{"title":"全国辅导员使用五种项目评估的调查","authors":"C. Peterson, K. Schmid, René Kososki","doi":"10.1080/21501378.2019.1678017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Evaluation is a critical part of counseling practice. Single case evaluation, needs assessment, formative, outcome, and summative evaluation are used at different points in a program for different questions. Few studies have examined counselors’ evaluation practices and none have compared school, mental health, and other counselors’ use of these five types. In this study we investigate the frequency with which counselors perform evaluation, if evaluation practice differs by type of counselor and type of evaluation, and obstacles to conducting evaluation. A national sample of counselors (n = 911) report that they perform single case and outcome evaluation the most frequently. Their use of single case, formative and summative evaluation, and needs assessment differs by counselor type. Furthermore, counselors report heavy obstacles to evaluation, with lack of time, low administrative support, and funding emerging as key themes. Attitude did not emerge as a major obstacle.","PeriodicalId":37884,"journal":{"name":"Counseling Outcome Research and Evaluation","volume":"41 1","pages":"71 - 87"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A National Survey of Counselors’ Use of Five Types of Program Evaluation\",\"authors\":\"C. Peterson, K. Schmid, René Kososki\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/21501378.2019.1678017\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Evaluation is a critical part of counseling practice. Single case evaluation, needs assessment, formative, outcome, and summative evaluation are used at different points in a program for different questions. Few studies have examined counselors’ evaluation practices and none have compared school, mental health, and other counselors’ use of these five types. In this study we investigate the frequency with which counselors perform evaluation, if evaluation practice differs by type of counselor and type of evaluation, and obstacles to conducting evaluation. A national sample of counselors (n = 911) report that they perform single case and outcome evaluation the most frequently. Their use of single case, formative and summative evaluation, and needs assessment differs by counselor type. Furthermore, counselors report heavy obstacles to evaluation, with lack of time, low administrative support, and funding emerging as key themes. Attitude did not emerge as a major obstacle.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37884,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Counseling Outcome Research and Evaluation\",\"volume\":\"41 1\",\"pages\":\"71 - 87\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-07-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Counseling Outcome Research and Evaluation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/21501378.2019.1678017\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Counseling Outcome Research and Evaluation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21501378.2019.1678017","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

评估是心理咨询实践的重要组成部分。单个案例评估、需求评估、形成性评估、结果评估和总结性评估在项目的不同阶段用于不同的问题。很少有研究考察过咨询师的评估实践,也没有人比较过学校、心理健康和其他咨询师对这五种类型的使用。在这项研究中,我们调查了咨询师进行评估的频率,评估实践是否因咨询师和评估类型的不同而不同,以及进行评估的障碍。一份全国咨询师样本(n = 911)报告称,他们最频繁地进行个案和结果评估。他们对个案、形成性和总结性评估以及需求评估的使用因咨询师类型而异。此外,辅导员报告了评估的重大障碍,缺乏时间,行政支持低,资金成为关键主题。态度并没有成为主要障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A National Survey of Counselors’ Use of Five Types of Program Evaluation
Abstract Evaluation is a critical part of counseling practice. Single case evaluation, needs assessment, formative, outcome, and summative evaluation are used at different points in a program for different questions. Few studies have examined counselors’ evaluation practices and none have compared school, mental health, and other counselors’ use of these five types. In this study we investigate the frequency with which counselors perform evaluation, if evaluation practice differs by type of counselor and type of evaluation, and obstacles to conducting evaluation. A national sample of counselors (n = 911) report that they perform single case and outcome evaluation the most frequently. Their use of single case, formative and summative evaluation, and needs assessment differs by counselor type. Furthermore, counselors report heavy obstacles to evaluation, with lack of time, low administrative support, and funding emerging as key themes. Attitude did not emerge as a major obstacle.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Counseling Outcome Research and Evaluation
Counseling Outcome Research and Evaluation Psychology-Psychology (all)
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
期刊介绍: Counseling Outcome Research and Evaluation (CORE) provides counselor educators, researchers, educators, and other mental health practitioners with outcome research and program evaluation practices for work with individuals across the lifespan. It addresses topics such as: treatment efficacy, clinical diagnosis, program evaluation, research design, outcome measure reviews. This journal also serves to address ethical, legal, and cultural concerns in the assessment of dependent variables, implementation of clinical interventions, and outcome research. Manuscripts typically fall into one of the following categories: Counseling Outcome Research: Treatment efficacy and effectiveness of mental health, school, addictions, rehabilitation, family, and college counseling interventions across the lifespan as reported in clinical trials, single-case research designs, single-group designs, and multi- or mixed-method designs.
期刊最新文献
A Systematic Review of Emotion Focused Group Therapy Using Quality Indicators Scoping Review Methodology: A Practical Guide for Counseling Researchers Creating Researcher-Practitioner Partnerships in Counseling: Lessons Learned A Systematic Review of Data Analysis Decisions in Counseling Single-Case Research Designs to Inform Best Practices Effectiveness of DBT Partial Hospitalization Program for Adolescents and Young Adults
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1