{"title":"全国辅导员使用五种项目评估的调查","authors":"C. Peterson, K. Schmid, René Kososki","doi":"10.1080/21501378.2019.1678017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Evaluation is a critical part of counseling practice. Single case evaluation, needs assessment, formative, outcome, and summative evaluation are used at different points in a program for different questions. Few studies have examined counselors’ evaluation practices and none have compared school, mental health, and other counselors’ use of these five types. In this study we investigate the frequency with which counselors perform evaluation, if evaluation practice differs by type of counselor and type of evaluation, and obstacles to conducting evaluation. A national sample of counselors (n = 911) report that they perform single case and outcome evaluation the most frequently. Their use of single case, formative and summative evaluation, and needs assessment differs by counselor type. Furthermore, counselors report heavy obstacles to evaluation, with lack of time, low administrative support, and funding emerging as key themes. Attitude did not emerge as a major obstacle.","PeriodicalId":37884,"journal":{"name":"Counseling Outcome Research and Evaluation","volume":"41 1","pages":"71 - 87"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A National Survey of Counselors’ Use of Five Types of Program Evaluation\",\"authors\":\"C. Peterson, K. Schmid, René Kososki\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/21501378.2019.1678017\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Evaluation is a critical part of counseling practice. Single case evaluation, needs assessment, formative, outcome, and summative evaluation are used at different points in a program for different questions. Few studies have examined counselors’ evaluation practices and none have compared school, mental health, and other counselors’ use of these five types. In this study we investigate the frequency with which counselors perform evaluation, if evaluation practice differs by type of counselor and type of evaluation, and obstacles to conducting evaluation. A national sample of counselors (n = 911) report that they perform single case and outcome evaluation the most frequently. Their use of single case, formative and summative evaluation, and needs assessment differs by counselor type. Furthermore, counselors report heavy obstacles to evaluation, with lack of time, low administrative support, and funding emerging as key themes. Attitude did not emerge as a major obstacle.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37884,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Counseling Outcome Research and Evaluation\",\"volume\":\"41 1\",\"pages\":\"71 - 87\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-07-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Counseling Outcome Research and Evaluation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/21501378.2019.1678017\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Counseling Outcome Research and Evaluation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21501378.2019.1678017","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
A National Survey of Counselors’ Use of Five Types of Program Evaluation
Abstract Evaluation is a critical part of counseling practice. Single case evaluation, needs assessment, formative, outcome, and summative evaluation are used at different points in a program for different questions. Few studies have examined counselors’ evaluation practices and none have compared school, mental health, and other counselors’ use of these five types. In this study we investigate the frequency with which counselors perform evaluation, if evaluation practice differs by type of counselor and type of evaluation, and obstacles to conducting evaluation. A national sample of counselors (n = 911) report that they perform single case and outcome evaluation the most frequently. Their use of single case, formative and summative evaluation, and needs assessment differs by counselor type. Furthermore, counselors report heavy obstacles to evaluation, with lack of time, low administrative support, and funding emerging as key themes. Attitude did not emerge as a major obstacle.
期刊介绍:
Counseling Outcome Research and Evaluation (CORE) provides counselor educators, researchers, educators, and other mental health practitioners with outcome research and program evaluation practices for work with individuals across the lifespan. It addresses topics such as: treatment efficacy, clinical diagnosis, program evaluation, research design, outcome measure reviews. This journal also serves to address ethical, legal, and cultural concerns in the assessment of dependent variables, implementation of clinical interventions, and outcome research. Manuscripts typically fall into one of the following categories: Counseling Outcome Research: Treatment efficacy and effectiveness of mental health, school, addictions, rehabilitation, family, and college counseling interventions across the lifespan as reported in clinical trials, single-case research designs, single-group designs, and multi- or mixed-method designs.