整合入门写作、沟通与设计思维课程的影响

Q3 Social Sciences Journal of Technology Education Pub Date : 2019-10-28 DOI:10.21061/JTE.V30I1.A.4
Amelia Chesley, M. W. Coots, Andrew Jackson, Sarah Knapp, N. Mentzer, Dawn Laux
{"title":"整合入门写作、沟通与设计思维课程的影响","authors":"Amelia Chesley, M. W. Coots, Andrew Jackson, Sarah Knapp, N. Mentzer, Dawn Laux","doi":"10.21061/JTE.V30I1.A.4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Much recent STEM research indicates that course integration improves the student learning experience and fosters stronger connections among concepts and skills; this study attempts to evaluate whether or not students learn the design process more fully in the integrated version of a required first-year course, Design Thinking in Technology. Drawing from an ongoing assessment of an Integrated First-Year Experience at Purdue University, this article reports on the challenges of teaching design thinking and analyzes whether students in an interdisciplinary course integration can demonstrate the work of their design processes more completely and effectively compared to students in a nonintegrated version of the course. We employ a modified version of the Engineering Design Process Portfolio Scoring Rubric (EDPPSR) as a method of evaluating students’ design portfolios. Our initial and follow-up analyses show that students in both versions of the course struggle to complete design journal assignments satisfactorily. We assess and analyze the impact of STEMhumanities integration on students’ abilities to document and contextualize the design process using journals, and also offer discussion and suggestions about our findings.","PeriodicalId":39755,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Technology Education","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Impacts of Integrating Introductory Composition, Communication, and Design Thinking Courses\",\"authors\":\"Amelia Chesley, M. W. Coots, Andrew Jackson, Sarah Knapp, N. Mentzer, Dawn Laux\",\"doi\":\"10.21061/JTE.V30I1.A.4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Much recent STEM research indicates that course integration improves the student learning experience and fosters stronger connections among concepts and skills; this study attempts to evaluate whether or not students learn the design process more fully in the integrated version of a required first-year course, Design Thinking in Technology. Drawing from an ongoing assessment of an Integrated First-Year Experience at Purdue University, this article reports on the challenges of teaching design thinking and analyzes whether students in an interdisciplinary course integration can demonstrate the work of their design processes more completely and effectively compared to students in a nonintegrated version of the course. We employ a modified version of the Engineering Design Process Portfolio Scoring Rubric (EDPPSR) as a method of evaluating students’ design portfolios. Our initial and follow-up analyses show that students in both versions of the course struggle to complete design journal assignments satisfactorily. We assess and analyze the impact of STEMhumanities integration on students’ abilities to document and contextualize the design process using journals, and also offer discussion and suggestions about our findings.\",\"PeriodicalId\":39755,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Technology Education\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-10-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Technology Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21061/JTE.V30I1.A.4\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Technology Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21061/JTE.V30I1.A.4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

最近的许多STEM研究表明,课程整合改善了学生的学习体验,并促进了概念和技能之间更强的联系;本研究试图评估学生是否在一年级必修课程“技术中的设计思维”的综合版本中更充分地学习了设计过程。本文借鉴了对普渡大学一年级综合经验的持续评估,报告了教学设计思维的挑战,并分析了与非综合课程的学生相比,跨学科课程整合的学生是否能够更完整、更有效地展示他们的设计过程。我们采用改良版的工程设计过程作品集评分标准(EDPPSR)作为评估学生设计作品集的方法。我们的初步分析和后续分析表明,这两个版本的学生都很难令人满意地完成设计日志作业。我们评估和分析了STEMhumanities整合对学生使用期刊记录和背景化设计过程的能力的影响,并就我们的发现提供了讨论和建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Impacts of Integrating Introductory Composition, Communication, and Design Thinking Courses
Much recent STEM research indicates that course integration improves the student learning experience and fosters stronger connections among concepts and skills; this study attempts to evaluate whether or not students learn the design process more fully in the integrated version of a required first-year course, Design Thinking in Technology. Drawing from an ongoing assessment of an Integrated First-Year Experience at Purdue University, this article reports on the challenges of teaching design thinking and analyzes whether students in an interdisciplinary course integration can demonstrate the work of their design processes more completely and effectively compared to students in a nonintegrated version of the course. We employ a modified version of the Engineering Design Process Portfolio Scoring Rubric (EDPPSR) as a method of evaluating students’ design portfolios. Our initial and follow-up analyses show that students in both versions of the course struggle to complete design journal assignments satisfactorily. We assess and analyze the impact of STEMhumanities integration on students’ abilities to document and contextualize the design process using journals, and also offer discussion and suggestions about our findings.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Technology Education
Journal of Technology Education Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6
审稿时长
34 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Technology Education provides a forum for scholarly discussion on topics relating to technology education. Manuscripts should focus on technology education research, philosophy, and theory. In addition, the Journal publishes book reviews, editorials, guest articles, comprehensive literature reviews, and reactions to previously published articles.
期刊最新文献
Changes in Students’ Design-Thinking Mindsets after Design-Based Learning with Respect to Gender and Prior Experiences in Design&nbsp; 33 Years of the <em>JTE</em>: Visioning Forward Embracing Computational Thinking as an Impetus for Artificial Intelligence in Integrated STEM Disciplines through Engineering and Technology Education&nbsp; Miscellany Embedding Safety in Integrative STEM Teaching Methods Courses for Pre-Service Elementary Teachers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1