人生考验还是人生考验?:家长和老师对性格、学业成就、美德和道德理论的重视程度的异同

IF 0.8 3区 哲学 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Journal of Beliefs & Values-Studies in Religion & Education Pub Date : 2021-05-12 DOI:10.1080/13617672.2021.1920233
T. Harrison, Katy Dineen, Francisco Moller
{"title":"人生考验还是人生考验?:家长和老师对性格、学业成就、美德和道德理论的重视程度的异同","authors":"T. Harrison, Katy Dineen, Francisco Moller","doi":"10.1080/13617672.2021.1920233","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Although the area of parental involvement in education is well researched, much less is known about how parents and teachers might work together to cultivate desirable character virtues in their children/pupils. This article considers three potential barriers to parents/teachers forming such partnerships: i) differing views on the importance of character compared to academic attainment; ii) their prioritisation of moral, performance, civic and intellectual virtues; and iii) their prioritisation of different moral theories in ethical decision making. The article describes the findings from a quantitative study conducted with 376 parents and 137 teachers. The study found that both parents and teachers prioritise character over academic attainment but perceive the opposite to be true of their counterpart. Further, both parents and teachers rank moral virtues, such as honesty, as the most important, followed by performance virtues, such as resilience. The findings are significant as they illuminate a possible gap between parents and teachers in England, which, if addressed, will ensure children and young people are more likely to develop character qualities that contribute to individual and societal flourishing. Given that several countries are (re)introducing character education into the curriculum, the results of the study also have international significance.","PeriodicalId":45928,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Beliefs & Values-Studies in Religion & Education","volume":"44 1","pages":"137 - 158"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Tests of life or life of tests?: similarities and differences in parents’ and teachers’ prioritisation of character, academic attainment, the virtues and moral theories\",\"authors\":\"T. Harrison, Katy Dineen, Francisco Moller\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13617672.2021.1920233\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Although the area of parental involvement in education is well researched, much less is known about how parents and teachers might work together to cultivate desirable character virtues in their children/pupils. This article considers three potential barriers to parents/teachers forming such partnerships: i) differing views on the importance of character compared to academic attainment; ii) their prioritisation of moral, performance, civic and intellectual virtues; and iii) their prioritisation of different moral theories in ethical decision making. The article describes the findings from a quantitative study conducted with 376 parents and 137 teachers. The study found that both parents and teachers prioritise character over academic attainment but perceive the opposite to be true of their counterpart. Further, both parents and teachers rank moral virtues, such as honesty, as the most important, followed by performance virtues, such as resilience. The findings are significant as they illuminate a possible gap between parents and teachers in England, which, if addressed, will ensure children and young people are more likely to develop character qualities that contribute to individual and societal flourishing. Given that several countries are (re)introducing character education into the curriculum, the results of the study also have international significance.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45928,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Beliefs & Values-Studies in Religion & Education\",\"volume\":\"44 1\",\"pages\":\"137 - 158\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-05-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Beliefs & Values-Studies in Religion & Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13617672.2021.1920233\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Beliefs & Values-Studies in Religion & Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13617672.2021.1920233","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

虽然父母参与教育这一领域已经得到了充分的研究,但对于父母和教师如何共同努力培养孩子/学生理想的品格美德,我们所知甚少。本文考虑了阻碍家长/老师建立这种伙伴关系的三个潜在障碍:1)与学习成绩相比,对性格重要性的不同看法;Ii)道德、表现、公民和智力美德的优先次序;第三,他们在伦理决策中优先考虑不同的道德理论。这篇文章描述了对376名家长和137名教师进行定量研究的结果。研究发现,父母和老师都认为孩子的性格比学习成绩更重要,但他们的父母和老师却认为孩子的性格比学习成绩更重要。此外,家长和老师都认为道德美德,如诚实,是最重要的,其次是表现美德,如适应能力。这些发现意义重大,因为它们揭示了英国家长和老师之间可能存在的差距,如果解决了这一问题,将确保儿童和年轻人更有可能培养有助于个人和社会繁荣的性格品质。鉴于一些国家正在(重新)将品格教育引入课程,研究结果也具有国际意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Tests of life or life of tests?: similarities and differences in parents’ and teachers’ prioritisation of character, academic attainment, the virtues and moral theories
ABSTRACT Although the area of parental involvement in education is well researched, much less is known about how parents and teachers might work together to cultivate desirable character virtues in their children/pupils. This article considers three potential barriers to parents/teachers forming such partnerships: i) differing views on the importance of character compared to academic attainment; ii) their prioritisation of moral, performance, civic and intellectual virtues; and iii) their prioritisation of different moral theories in ethical decision making. The article describes the findings from a quantitative study conducted with 376 parents and 137 teachers. The study found that both parents and teachers prioritise character over academic attainment but perceive the opposite to be true of their counterpart. Further, both parents and teachers rank moral virtues, such as honesty, as the most important, followed by performance virtues, such as resilience. The findings are significant as they illuminate a possible gap between parents and teachers in England, which, if addressed, will ensure children and young people are more likely to develop character qualities that contribute to individual and societal flourishing. Given that several countries are (re)introducing character education into the curriculum, the results of the study also have international significance.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
31
期刊最新文献
Spirituality and religiosity in the developing person Telling the Christmas story in words and music: the development of and contemporary missional value of the Festival of Nine Lessons and Carols within cathedrals ‘Constructing the test to the teaching’ – and the complexities of assessing learning in ethics education Preaching on the Bible and engaging with science during the Cathedral Christmas Eve carol services: listening to the congregation’s response A temple to memory: peace and war together within a strange intertwining. Stepping again into the Memorial Chapel of Liverpool Cathedral
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1