ETF竞争与市场质量

Travis Box, Ryan L. Davis, Kathleen P. Fuller
{"title":"ETF竞争与市场质量","authors":"Travis Box, Ryan L. Davis, Kathleen P. Fuller","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2721813","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Our paper investigates competition between ETFs that hold nearly identical baskets of securities. We provide strong evidence that incumbent-fund market quality is negatively affected when a new fund is added to an asset class. The degradation in liquidity is even more severe whenever both funds follow the same benchmark. Furthermore, increasing the number of ETFs in an asset class does not put downward pressure on expense ratios. Thus, decreasing market quality, enumerated by increasing bid-ask spreads and price impacts, is not offset by decreasing costs of fund ownership – resulting in a loss of surplus for investors and incumbent ETF providers.","PeriodicalId":11837,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Other IO: Empirical Studies of Firms & Markets (Topic)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"ETF Competition and Market Quality\",\"authors\":\"Travis Box, Ryan L. Davis, Kathleen P. Fuller\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.2721813\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Our paper investigates competition between ETFs that hold nearly identical baskets of securities. We provide strong evidence that incumbent-fund market quality is negatively affected when a new fund is added to an asset class. The degradation in liquidity is even more severe whenever both funds follow the same benchmark. Furthermore, increasing the number of ETFs in an asset class does not put downward pressure on expense ratios. Thus, decreasing market quality, enumerated by increasing bid-ask spreads and price impacts, is not offset by decreasing costs of fund ownership – resulting in a loss of surplus for investors and incumbent ETF providers.\",\"PeriodicalId\":11837,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ERN: Other IO: Empirical Studies of Firms & Markets (Topic)\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ERN: Other IO: Empirical Studies of Firms & Markets (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2721813\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: Other IO: Empirical Studies of Firms & Markets (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2721813","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

我们的论文调查了持有几乎相同的证券篮子的etf之间的竞争。我们提供了强有力的证据表明,当一个新的基金被添加到一个资产类别中时,现有基金的市场质量会受到负面影响。如果这两只基金遵循同样的基准,流动性的下降就会更加严重。此外,增加某一资产类别的etf数量并不会给费用率带来下行压力。因此,不断增加的买卖价差和价格影响所带来的市场质量下降,并没有被基金持有成本的下降所抵消——这导致投资者和现有ETF提供商的盈余损失。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
ETF Competition and Market Quality
Our paper investigates competition between ETFs that hold nearly identical baskets of securities. We provide strong evidence that incumbent-fund market quality is negatively affected when a new fund is added to an asset class. The degradation in liquidity is even more severe whenever both funds follow the same benchmark. Furthermore, increasing the number of ETFs in an asset class does not put downward pressure on expense ratios. Thus, decreasing market quality, enumerated by increasing bid-ask spreads and price impacts, is not offset by decreasing costs of fund ownership – resulting in a loss of surplus for investors and incumbent ETF providers.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Modeling Preference Heterogeneity Within and Across Behavioral Types: Evidence from a Real-world Betting Market The economics of movies (revisited): A decade of literature in review Does Industry Classification Matter in IT Business Value Research? A Simple Method to Estimate Discrete-type Random Coefficients Logit Models Intermittent versus Dispatchable Power Sources: An Integrated Competitive Assessment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1