沙特英语学习者的动机因素:文科与理科预科学生的比较研究

Q4 Arts and Humanities Brazilian English Language Teaching Journal Pub Date : 2023-08-28 DOI:10.5539/elt.v16n9p113
Mawaddah Anwar Qurban, Zilal Meccawy
{"title":"沙特英语学习者的动机因素:文科与理科预科学生的比较研究","authors":"Mawaddah Anwar Qurban, Zilal Meccawy","doi":"10.5539/elt.v16n9p113","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"While several studies in L2 deal with motivation in English language learning, demotivation has recently become the focus of much research. Following Sakai and Kikuchi's (2009) theoretical framework, this study aims to investigate the demotivation factors that affect Saudi students learning English in the Preparatory Year Programme (PYP) at a Saudi university. The data were collected from a random sample of 221 university students from the Arts Track (103) and the Science Track (118). Quantitative and qualitative data were collected using a questionnaire with two open-ended questions and analysed using SPSS and content analysis. The results revealed that the main demotivating factor that affects both tracks is ‘experience of failure and test score’. In addition, there was no significant difference between the students on the Arts Track and the Science Track pertinent to factors such as: 'experiences of failure and test scores', 'class environment', and 'learning content and materials.' However, there was a significant difference between the two tracks related to 'teachers' competence and teaching styles', 'characteristics of the classroom' and students' 'lack of interest' factors. The study's findings may have broader implications because they suggest that teachers can significantly impact students' intrinsic motivation as they can motivate low-performing students and those who have failed. It also suggests that teachers should dissuade students from comparing themselves to their classmates, avoid making comparisons among students, and use more communicative language teaching methods. Saudi pre-service and in-service EFL instructors should be better prepared to identify the primary sources of their students' demotivation and provide solutions to improve the learning environment.","PeriodicalId":30319,"journal":{"name":"Brazilian English Language Teaching Journal","volume":"91 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Demotivating Factors for Saudi EFL Learners: A Comparative Study between Arts and Science Tracks Preparatory Year Programme Students\",\"authors\":\"Mawaddah Anwar Qurban, Zilal Meccawy\",\"doi\":\"10.5539/elt.v16n9p113\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"While several studies in L2 deal with motivation in English language learning, demotivation has recently become the focus of much research. Following Sakai and Kikuchi's (2009) theoretical framework, this study aims to investigate the demotivation factors that affect Saudi students learning English in the Preparatory Year Programme (PYP) at a Saudi university. The data were collected from a random sample of 221 university students from the Arts Track (103) and the Science Track (118). Quantitative and qualitative data were collected using a questionnaire with two open-ended questions and analysed using SPSS and content analysis. The results revealed that the main demotivating factor that affects both tracks is ‘experience of failure and test score’. In addition, there was no significant difference between the students on the Arts Track and the Science Track pertinent to factors such as: 'experiences of failure and test scores', 'class environment', and 'learning content and materials.' However, there was a significant difference between the two tracks related to 'teachers' competence and teaching styles', 'characteristics of the classroom' and students' 'lack of interest' factors. The study's findings may have broader implications because they suggest that teachers can significantly impact students' intrinsic motivation as they can motivate low-performing students and those who have failed. It also suggests that teachers should dissuade students from comparing themselves to their classmates, avoid making comparisons among students, and use more communicative language teaching methods. Saudi pre-service and in-service EFL instructors should be better prepared to identify the primary sources of their students' demotivation and provide solutions to improve the learning environment.\",\"PeriodicalId\":30319,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Brazilian English Language Teaching Journal\",\"volume\":\"91 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Brazilian English Language Teaching Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v16n9p113\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brazilian English Language Teaching Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v16n9p113","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

虽然有一些关于二语学习动机的研究,但去动机学近年来成为许多研究的焦点。遵循Sakai和Kikuchi(2009)的理论框架,本研究旨在调查影响沙特学生在沙特大学预科课程(PYP)中学习英语的失动力因素。这些数据是从221名大学生中随机抽取的,分别来自文科专业(103名)和理科专业(118名)。定量和定性数据采用开放式问卷收集,采用SPSS软件和内容分析进行分析。结果显示,影响这两种轨迹的主要消极因素是“失败经历和考试分数”。此外,文科组和理科组的学生在“失败经历和考试成绩”、“课堂环境”和“学习内容和材料”等因素上没有显著差异。然而,在“教师能力和教学风格”、“课堂特征”和学生“缺乏兴趣”因素方面,两种轨迹之间存在显著差异。这项研究的发现可能具有更广泛的意义,因为它们表明教师可以显著影响学生的内在动机,因为他们可以激励表现不佳和失败的学生。它还建议教师应该劝阻学生不要把自己和同学比较,避免学生之间的比较,并使用更多的交际性语言教学方法。沙特的职前和在职英语教师应该做好充分的准备,找出学生动机丧失的主要来源,并提供改善学习环境的解决方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Demotivating Factors for Saudi EFL Learners: A Comparative Study between Arts and Science Tracks Preparatory Year Programme Students
While several studies in L2 deal with motivation in English language learning, demotivation has recently become the focus of much research. Following Sakai and Kikuchi's (2009) theoretical framework, this study aims to investigate the demotivation factors that affect Saudi students learning English in the Preparatory Year Programme (PYP) at a Saudi university. The data were collected from a random sample of 221 university students from the Arts Track (103) and the Science Track (118). Quantitative and qualitative data were collected using a questionnaire with two open-ended questions and analysed using SPSS and content analysis. The results revealed that the main demotivating factor that affects both tracks is ‘experience of failure and test score’. In addition, there was no significant difference between the students on the Arts Track and the Science Track pertinent to factors such as: 'experiences of failure and test scores', 'class environment', and 'learning content and materials.' However, there was a significant difference between the two tracks related to 'teachers' competence and teaching styles', 'characteristics of the classroom' and students' 'lack of interest' factors. The study's findings may have broader implications because they suggest that teachers can significantly impact students' intrinsic motivation as they can motivate low-performing students and those who have failed. It also suggests that teachers should dissuade students from comparing themselves to their classmates, avoid making comparisons among students, and use more communicative language teaching methods. Saudi pre-service and in-service EFL instructors should be better prepared to identify the primary sources of their students' demotivation and provide solutions to improve the learning environment.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Brazilian English Language Teaching Journal
Brazilian English Language Teaching Journal Social Sciences-Linguistics and Language
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
Review of English L2 Vocabulary Learning and Teaching: Concepts, Principles, and Pedagogy Actual Usage of Machine Translation by Japanese University Students and Verification of Test Results Reviewer acknowledgements for English Language Teaching, Vol. 16, No. 11, 2023 Research on the Promotion of EAP Teachers' Information Literacy under TPACK Framework in the Era of Digital Intelligence Leveraging Artificial Intelligence (AI): Chat GPT for Effective English Language Learning among Thai Students
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1