A/E设计团队工作场所沟通中的时间压力和同质性程度

issue 2 Pub Date : 2021-06-25 DOI:10.25219/epoj.2021.00109
Lindsey Walker, B. Franz
{"title":"A/E设计团队工作场所沟通中的时间压力和同质性程度","authors":"Lindsey Walker, B. Franz","doi":"10.25219/epoj.2021.00109","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Workplace collaboration depends on communication and is critical in building design. For large, highly diverse teams, such as those found in architecture and engineering (A/E) who work under timebased deadlines, homophily—or the tendency to seek interactions with others of similar backgrounds and values—can play a role in how individuals communicate. Homophily is potentially damaging to teams that must coordinate information from a diverse membership, since communication may become less likely to occur across disciplines. Therefore, this research examines the extent to which a sampled A/E team exhibits homophily in their information exchanges across multiple communication media, when under the moderating effect of two different levels of time pressure. The study uses a social network analysis of the communication patterns in an 18-member studio team working for a national A/E firm located in the southeastern United States. The results show some evidence of homophily as a predictor of information exchanges when controlling for the hierarchical ties within the studio team and the physical distance between its members in the office. In a low time pressure work environment, face-to-face communication was more likely when members were of the same gender. This effect was not present when the team was under high time pressure, where face-to-face interactions were instead more likely between members of the same discipline. Homophily in phone communication was found in the generational similarity of team members, regardless of time pressure. There was little evidence that homophily was a predictor of email communication. These results have implications for the design of studio workplaces that support information-rich interactions, the assignment of individual designers to project teams that are more likely to interact with co-workers from different backgrounds, and organizational policy regarding the use of specific communication media based on the project schedule and time pressure.","PeriodicalId":14606,"journal":{"name":"issue 2","volume":"447 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Time Pressure and the Extent of Homophily in the Workplace Communications of A/E Design Teams\",\"authors\":\"Lindsey Walker, B. Franz\",\"doi\":\"10.25219/epoj.2021.00109\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Workplace collaboration depends on communication and is critical in building design. For large, highly diverse teams, such as those found in architecture and engineering (A/E) who work under timebased deadlines, homophily—or the tendency to seek interactions with others of similar backgrounds and values—can play a role in how individuals communicate. Homophily is potentially damaging to teams that must coordinate information from a diverse membership, since communication may become less likely to occur across disciplines. Therefore, this research examines the extent to which a sampled A/E team exhibits homophily in their information exchanges across multiple communication media, when under the moderating effect of two different levels of time pressure. The study uses a social network analysis of the communication patterns in an 18-member studio team working for a national A/E firm located in the southeastern United States. The results show some evidence of homophily as a predictor of information exchanges when controlling for the hierarchical ties within the studio team and the physical distance between its members in the office. In a low time pressure work environment, face-to-face communication was more likely when members were of the same gender. This effect was not present when the team was under high time pressure, where face-to-face interactions were instead more likely between members of the same discipline. Homophily in phone communication was found in the generational similarity of team members, regardless of time pressure. There was little evidence that homophily was a predictor of email communication. These results have implications for the design of studio workplaces that support information-rich interactions, the assignment of individual designers to project teams that are more likely to interact with co-workers from different backgrounds, and organizational policy regarding the use of specific communication media based on the project schedule and time pressure.\",\"PeriodicalId\":14606,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"issue 2\",\"volume\":\"447 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"issue 2\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.25219/epoj.2021.00109\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"issue 2","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25219/epoj.2021.00109","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

工作场所的协作依赖于沟通,在建筑设计中至关重要。对于大型、高度多样化的团队,比如那些在基于时间的最后期限下工作的建筑和工程(A/E)团队,同质性——或者寻求与具有相似背景和价值观的其他人进行互动的倾向——可以在个人沟通中发挥作用。同质性对于必须协调来自不同成员的信息的团队来说是潜在的损害,因为跨学科的沟通可能变得不太可能发生。因此,本研究考察了在两种不同水平的时间压力的调节作用下,抽样的a /E团队在跨多种传播媒介的信息交换中表现出同质性的程度。该研究使用了社交网络分析,分析了位于美国东南部的一家全国性的a /E公司的18人工作室团队的交流模式。结果表明,在控制工作室团队内部的等级关系和办公室成员之间的物理距离时,同质性可以预测信息交换。在低时间压力的工作环境中,当成员是同性时,面对面的交流更有可能发生。当团队处于高时间压力下时,这种效应就不存在了,在这种情况下,同一学科的成员之间更有可能进行面对面的交流。电话沟通中的同质性体现在团队成员的代际相似性上,而不考虑时间压力。几乎没有证据表明同质性是电子邮件交流的一个预测因素。这些结果对工作室工作场所的设计具有启示意义,这些工作场所支持信息丰富的互动,将个人设计师分配到更有可能与来自不同背景的同事互动的项目团队,以及基于项目进度和时间压力使用特定沟通媒体的组织政策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Time Pressure and the Extent of Homophily in the Workplace Communications of A/E Design Teams
Workplace collaboration depends on communication and is critical in building design. For large, highly diverse teams, such as those found in architecture and engineering (A/E) who work under timebased deadlines, homophily—or the tendency to seek interactions with others of similar backgrounds and values—can play a role in how individuals communicate. Homophily is potentially damaging to teams that must coordinate information from a diverse membership, since communication may become less likely to occur across disciplines. Therefore, this research examines the extent to which a sampled A/E team exhibits homophily in their information exchanges across multiple communication media, when under the moderating effect of two different levels of time pressure. The study uses a social network analysis of the communication patterns in an 18-member studio team working for a national A/E firm located in the southeastern United States. The results show some evidence of homophily as a predictor of information exchanges when controlling for the hierarchical ties within the studio team and the physical distance between its members in the office. In a low time pressure work environment, face-to-face communication was more likely when members were of the same gender. This effect was not present when the team was under high time pressure, where face-to-face interactions were instead more likely between members of the same discipline. Homophily in phone communication was found in the generational similarity of team members, regardless of time pressure. There was little evidence that homophily was a predictor of email communication. These results have implications for the design of studio workplaces that support information-rich interactions, the assignment of individual designers to project teams that are more likely to interact with co-workers from different backgrounds, and organizational policy regarding the use of specific communication media based on the project schedule and time pressure.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A System Dynamics Analysis of Value Creation in Project Context Disruptive Times, Disruptive Engineering, the Need for New Approaches for Disruptive Project Management The Social Sustainability of Infrastructure: Constructing for Justice Time Pressure and the Extent of Homophily in the Workplace Communications of A/E Design Teams Post COVID-19: Towards Human Leadership And New Work Modalities
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1