危机管理:国际组织应对COVID-19大流行的合法性工作

O. Ulybina, Laia Pi Ferrer, Pertti Alasuutari
{"title":"危机管理:国际组织应对COVID-19大流行的合法性工作","authors":"O. Ulybina, Laia Pi Ferrer, Pertti Alasuutari","doi":"10.1080/23254823.2023.2195479","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper analyzes legitimation practices of international organisations in the face of the global COVID-19 pandemic. We analyse a sample of 252 major international governmental organisations (IGOs) and 250 international non-governmental organisations (INGOs), using information collected from their websites in September–December 2020. We seek to understand why the vast majority of both IGOs and INGOs responded to the crisis and what were the different types of reactions. We study variations in legitimation practices among different types of organisations–governmental vs non-governmental, general-purpose vs task-specific, large vs small, etc. Drawing on rational choice and neo-institutionalist scholarship, we test several hypotheses to account for the patterns of IO's legitimation work triggered by COVID-19 crisis. Our findings give some support to both theoretical perspectives. Organisation's resources are the best predictor for its conduct in response to the crisis. At the same time, organisations largely behave in a conformist way, actively engaging in legitimation work, and investing in their public visibility in relation to COVID-19 pandemic. © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.","PeriodicalId":37289,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Cultural and Political Sociology","volume":"24 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Managing the crisis: International organisations’ responses to the COVID-19 pandemic as legitimation work\",\"authors\":\"O. Ulybina, Laia Pi Ferrer, Pertti Alasuutari\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/23254823.2023.2195479\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper analyzes legitimation practices of international organisations in the face of the global COVID-19 pandemic. We analyse a sample of 252 major international governmental organisations (IGOs) and 250 international non-governmental organisations (INGOs), using information collected from their websites in September–December 2020. We seek to understand why the vast majority of both IGOs and INGOs responded to the crisis and what were the different types of reactions. We study variations in legitimation practices among different types of organisations–governmental vs non-governmental, general-purpose vs task-specific, large vs small, etc. Drawing on rational choice and neo-institutionalist scholarship, we test several hypotheses to account for the patterns of IO's legitimation work triggered by COVID-19 crisis. Our findings give some support to both theoretical perspectives. Organisation's resources are the best predictor for its conduct in response to the crisis. At the same time, organisations largely behave in a conformist way, actively engaging in legitimation work, and investing in their public visibility in relation to COVID-19 pandemic. © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37289,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Cultural and Political Sociology\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Cultural and Political Sociology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/23254823.2023.2195479\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Cultural and Political Sociology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23254823.2023.2195479","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文分析了面对新冠肺炎全球大流行,国际组织的合法化实践。我们分析了252个主要国际政府组织(igo)和250个国际非政府组织(ingo)的样本,使用了2020年9月至12月从其网站收集的信息。我们试图了解为什么绝大多数政府间组织和国际非政府组织都对危机做出了反应,以及不同的反应类型是什么。我们研究不同类型的组织——政府组织与非政府组织、通用组织与特定任务组织、大型组织与小型组织等——在合法化实践方面的差异。利用理性选择和新制度主义学术,我们测试了几个假设,以解释COVID-19危机引发的国际刑事组织合法化工作的模式。我们的研究结果为这两种理论观点提供了一些支持。组织的资源是其应对危机行为的最佳预测指标。与此同时,组织在很大程度上以墨守成规的方式行事,积极参与合法化工作,并投资于与COVID-19大流行相关的公众知名度。©2023作者。由Informa UK Limited出版,以Taylor & Francis Group的名义进行交易。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Managing the crisis: International organisations’ responses to the COVID-19 pandemic as legitimation work
This paper analyzes legitimation practices of international organisations in the face of the global COVID-19 pandemic. We analyse a sample of 252 major international governmental organisations (IGOs) and 250 international non-governmental organisations (INGOs), using information collected from their websites in September–December 2020. We seek to understand why the vast majority of both IGOs and INGOs responded to the crisis and what were the different types of reactions. We study variations in legitimation practices among different types of organisations–governmental vs non-governmental, general-purpose vs task-specific, large vs small, etc. Drawing on rational choice and neo-institutionalist scholarship, we test several hypotheses to account for the patterns of IO's legitimation work triggered by COVID-19 crisis. Our findings give some support to both theoretical perspectives. Organisation's resources are the best predictor for its conduct in response to the crisis. At the same time, organisations largely behave in a conformist way, actively engaging in legitimation work, and investing in their public visibility in relation to COVID-19 pandemic. © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
European Journal of Cultural and Political Sociology
European Journal of Cultural and Political Sociology Social Sciences-Cultural Studies
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
32
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Cultural and Political Sociology is a peer-reviewed journal published under the auspices of the European Sociological Association. The study of culture is the fastest growing area in both European and North American sociology. Political sociology is also re-establishing itself as a central plank of the discipline.
期刊最新文献
The far right in Spain: An ‘exception’ to what? Challenging conventions in the study of populism through innovative methodologies Exploring the limits and boundaries between cultural practices and political values in contemporary Finland Deserved. Economic memories after the fall of the Iron Curtain Deserved. Economic memories after the fall of the Iron Curtain , by Till Hilmar, New York, Columbia University Press, 2023, 227 pp., $35.00 (Paperback), ISBN: 9780231209793 Celebrating 10 years of the journal Zygmunt Bauman and the theory of culture Zygmunt Bauman and the theory of culture , by Dariusz Brzeziński, Montreal, McGill-Queen's University Press, 2022, 192 pp., £30.51 (paperback), ISBN-13: 978-0228013976
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1