基因组学来了:我们能用它做什么?它带来了哪些伦理问题?

Chris Willmott, John Bryant
{"title":"基因组学来了:我们能用它做什么?它带来了哪些伦理问题?","authors":"Chris Willmott, John Bryant","doi":"10.1080/20502877.2023.2180839","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"2023 marks twenty years since the formal completion of the Human Genome Project (HGP). As many readers will know, this monumental international collaboration to determine the sequence of all three billion ‘letters’ (bases) in the human genome had taken legions of scientists more than a decade to achieve. Much was made of the power of this database to revolutionize our understanding of human biology and to herald the transforming potential of genetics for tailored medical treatments. Editorials at the time declared that the Genomic Era had arrived (e.g. Guttmacher and Collins 2003, Roses 2003). The phenomenal technical achievements of the HGP cannot be overstated. However, there was more than a hint of hype in the marketing of the project, not least in justifying the three billion dollars it was estimated to have cost. Between them, the official HGP and the rival Celera project had managed to produce completed reference genomes from a small collection of individuals, fewer than a dozen in total. Yet, much of the power of genomics comes not from the aspects of our DNAwe sharewith others (and those reference sequences), but from the differences that make us distinct, estimated to be roughly one base in every thousand. The available methodologies of the time simply could not deliver the types of personalised analysis promised in an economically viable and timely fashion.","PeriodicalId":43760,"journal":{"name":"New Bioethics-A Multidisciplinary Journal of Biotechnology and the Body","volume":"29 1","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Genomics is here: what can we do with it, and what ethical issues has it brought along for the ride?\",\"authors\":\"Chris Willmott, John Bryant\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/20502877.2023.2180839\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"2023 marks twenty years since the formal completion of the Human Genome Project (HGP). As many readers will know, this monumental international collaboration to determine the sequence of all three billion ‘letters’ (bases) in the human genome had taken legions of scientists more than a decade to achieve. Much was made of the power of this database to revolutionize our understanding of human biology and to herald the transforming potential of genetics for tailored medical treatments. Editorials at the time declared that the Genomic Era had arrived (e.g. Guttmacher and Collins 2003, Roses 2003). The phenomenal technical achievements of the HGP cannot be overstated. However, there was more than a hint of hype in the marketing of the project, not least in justifying the three billion dollars it was estimated to have cost. Between them, the official HGP and the rival Celera project had managed to produce completed reference genomes from a small collection of individuals, fewer than a dozen in total. Yet, much of the power of genomics comes not from the aspects of our DNAwe sharewith others (and those reference sequences), but from the differences that make us distinct, estimated to be roughly one base in every thousand. The available methodologies of the time simply could not deliver the types of personalised analysis promised in an economically viable and timely fashion.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43760,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"New Bioethics-A Multidisciplinary Journal of Biotechnology and the Body\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"1-9\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"New Bioethics-A Multidisciplinary Journal of Biotechnology and the Body\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/20502877.2023.2180839\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ETHICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New Bioethics-A Multidisciplinary Journal of Biotechnology and the Body","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20502877.2023.2180839","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Genomics is here: what can we do with it, and what ethical issues has it brought along for the ride?
2023 marks twenty years since the formal completion of the Human Genome Project (HGP). As many readers will know, this monumental international collaboration to determine the sequence of all three billion ‘letters’ (bases) in the human genome had taken legions of scientists more than a decade to achieve. Much was made of the power of this database to revolutionize our understanding of human biology and to herald the transforming potential of genetics for tailored medical treatments. Editorials at the time declared that the Genomic Era had arrived (e.g. Guttmacher and Collins 2003, Roses 2003). The phenomenal technical achievements of the HGP cannot be overstated. However, there was more than a hint of hype in the marketing of the project, not least in justifying the three billion dollars it was estimated to have cost. Between them, the official HGP and the rival Celera project had managed to produce completed reference genomes from a small collection of individuals, fewer than a dozen in total. Yet, much of the power of genomics comes not from the aspects of our DNAwe sharewith others (and those reference sequences), but from the differences that make us distinct, estimated to be roughly one base in every thousand. The available methodologies of the time simply could not deliver the types of personalised analysis promised in an economically viable and timely fashion.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
16.70%
发文量
45
期刊最新文献
A quantitative analysis of stored frozen surplus embryos in the UK. Moral Distress and its Impact on Healthcare Workers in a European NICU. Artificial Intelligence for Clinical Decision-Making: Gross Negligence Manslaughter and Corporate Manslaughter. Machine learning, healthcare resource allocation, and patient consent. The Fertility Fix: the Boom in Facial-matching Algorithms for Donor Selection in Assisted Reproduction in Spain.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1