基于交通仿真的应急车辆优先处理策略评价

IF 1 4区 工程技术 Q4 ENGINEERING, CIVIL Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Transport Pub Date : 2022-05-03 DOI:10.1680/jtran.22.00019
Isrrah Malabanan, Ampol Karoonsoontawong, K. Kanitpong
{"title":"基于交通仿真的应急车辆优先处理策略评价","authors":"Isrrah Malabanan, Ampol Karoonsoontawong, K. Kanitpong","doi":"10.1680/jtran.22.00019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Emergency vehicles (EVs) must reach their destination within the shortest amount of time considering the importance of their service in saving lives and reducing property damage. This research aimed to reduce the delay experienced by these vehicles through the alteration of traffic control signals that would give preferential treatment to EVs upon detection. Specifically, this study compared three algorithms with concepts of emergency vehicle pre-emption (EVP), longest queue first, and emergency vehicle signal priority (EVSP) based on average general and EV delays through traffic simulation approach via VISSIM and its component object model (COM) interface. The performance evaluation was applied in Tuk Chai Intersection in Bangkok, Thailand as a case study. It was found that the second algorithm of longest queue first with pre-emption is the best approach for both 0.8 (peak) and peak hour traffic conditions, performing better than the do-nothing condition by 69.70% for stochastic EV input and 79.14% for fixed EV input. The findings of the study also show that the algorithm of preferential treatment using EVSP strategies produced a competitive and robust performance that has EV delay values being better than the do-nothing condition by 75.96%, 77.27%, and 45.67% in 0.8 (peak), peak-hour, and 1.2 (peak) traffic conditions, respectively.","PeriodicalId":49670,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Transport","volume":"53 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An Evaluation of Emergency Vehicle Preferential Treatment Strategies by Traffic Simulation\",\"authors\":\"Isrrah Malabanan, Ampol Karoonsoontawong, K. Kanitpong\",\"doi\":\"10.1680/jtran.22.00019\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Emergency vehicles (EVs) must reach their destination within the shortest amount of time considering the importance of their service in saving lives and reducing property damage. This research aimed to reduce the delay experienced by these vehicles through the alteration of traffic control signals that would give preferential treatment to EVs upon detection. Specifically, this study compared three algorithms with concepts of emergency vehicle pre-emption (EVP), longest queue first, and emergency vehicle signal priority (EVSP) based on average general and EV delays through traffic simulation approach via VISSIM and its component object model (COM) interface. The performance evaluation was applied in Tuk Chai Intersection in Bangkok, Thailand as a case study. It was found that the second algorithm of longest queue first with pre-emption is the best approach for both 0.8 (peak) and peak hour traffic conditions, performing better than the do-nothing condition by 69.70% for stochastic EV input and 79.14% for fixed EV input. The findings of the study also show that the algorithm of preferential treatment using EVSP strategies produced a competitive and robust performance that has EV delay values being better than the do-nothing condition by 75.96%, 77.27%, and 45.67% in 0.8 (peak), peak-hour, and 1.2 (peak) traffic conditions, respectively.\",\"PeriodicalId\":49670,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Transport\",\"volume\":\"53 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Transport\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1680/jtran.22.00019\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, CIVIL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Transport","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1680/jtran.22.00019","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

考虑到应急车辆在拯救生命和减少财产损失方面的重要性,它们必须在最短的时间内到达目的地。本研究旨在通过改变交通控制信号,在检测到电动汽车时给予优先处理,从而减少这些车辆的延误。具体而言,本研究通过VISSIM及其组件对象模型(COM)接口的交通仿真方法,比较了三种基于平均一般和EV延迟的应急车辆抢占(EVP)、最长队列优先(longest queue first)和应急车辆信号优先(EVSP)概念的算法。并以泰国曼谷德斋十字路口为例进行了性能评价。研究发现,无论在0.8(高峰)交通条件下还是在高峰时段交通条件下,具有抢占优势的最长队列优先算法都是最优算法,在随机EV输入下比不行动交通条件下的效率提高69.70%,在固定EV输入下比不行动交通条件下的效率提高79.14%。研究结果还表明,采用EVSP策略的优先处理算法在0.8(高峰)、高峰小时和1.2(高峰)交通条件下,EV延迟值分别比不做条件好75.96%、77.27%和45.67%,具有较强的竞争力和鲁棒性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
An Evaluation of Emergency Vehicle Preferential Treatment Strategies by Traffic Simulation
Emergency vehicles (EVs) must reach their destination within the shortest amount of time considering the importance of their service in saving lives and reducing property damage. This research aimed to reduce the delay experienced by these vehicles through the alteration of traffic control signals that would give preferential treatment to EVs upon detection. Specifically, this study compared three algorithms with concepts of emergency vehicle pre-emption (EVP), longest queue first, and emergency vehicle signal priority (EVSP) based on average general and EV delays through traffic simulation approach via VISSIM and its component object model (COM) interface. The performance evaluation was applied in Tuk Chai Intersection in Bangkok, Thailand as a case study. It was found that the second algorithm of longest queue first with pre-emption is the best approach for both 0.8 (peak) and peak hour traffic conditions, performing better than the do-nothing condition by 69.70% for stochastic EV input and 79.14% for fixed EV input. The findings of the study also show that the algorithm of preferential treatment using EVSP strategies produced a competitive and robust performance that has EV delay values being better than the do-nothing condition by 75.96%, 77.27%, and 45.67% in 0.8 (peak), peak-hour, and 1.2 (peak) traffic conditions, respectively.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
42
审稿时长
5 months
期刊介绍: Transport is essential reading for those needing information on civil engineering developments across all areas of transport. This journal covers all aspects of planning, design, construction, maintenance and project management for the movement of goods and people. Specific topics covered include: transport planning and policy, construction of infrastructure projects, traffic management, airports and highway pavement maintenance and performance and the economic and environmental aspects of urban and inter-urban transportation systems.
期刊最新文献
Traffic crash prediction model in Kano State, Nigeria: a multivariate LSTM approach Pandemic insights: analyzing public transport with logit models Impact of COVID-19 restriction measures on transport sector in Sub-Saharan Africa: insights from Douala City, Cameroon Intersection optimization study based on traffic conditions in the physical area of intersections Harvesting electricity from road traffic noise energy – a literature review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1