{"title":"医生和实习生对远程关键护理实践和教育的看法:一项程序性调查的结果。","authors":"Milad Sharifpour, Timothy Buchman, Cheryl Hiddleson, Craig S Jabaley, Jayashree Raikhelkar","doi":"10.1089/tmr.2022.0037","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Telecritical care (TCC) as a telehealth modality seeks to remedy contemporary shortfalls in staffing and experience at the bedside. Physician and physician trainee perceptions of TCC practice and education can help inform programmatic and curricular decisions. The perceptions of TCC and a formalized structured TCC rotation from faculty and trainees are unknown.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate perceptions of TCC practice and education among participating physicians and trainees.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Survey of physicians and trainees participating in the Emory Critical Care Center's TCC unit from 2017 to 2021 was conducted, after implementation of a structured TCC educational curriculum. Items were developed with a 5-point Likert scale.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The overall response rate was 71% (43 of 61). Most respondents felt their knowledge was used appropriately and that their recommendations were well received at the bedside. The majority perceived that the TCC program improved continuity, quality, and safety of patient care. More than half of respondents would practice TCC in the future, and most would advocate for it. Most fellows were comfortable providing patient care remotely after their rotation. The majority of respondents felt TCC did not add to their level of burnout.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This programmatic evaluation identified perceived improvements in patient care. Implementation of a TCC rotation does not seem to negatively impact the educational experience of trainees.</p>","PeriodicalId":22295,"journal":{"name":"Telemedicine reports","volume":"3 1","pages":"201-205"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9811849/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Physician and Trainee Perceptions of Telecritical Care Practice and Education: Results of a Programmatic Survey.\",\"authors\":\"Milad Sharifpour, Timothy Buchman, Cheryl Hiddleson, Craig S Jabaley, Jayashree Raikhelkar\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/tmr.2022.0037\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Telecritical care (TCC) as a telehealth modality seeks to remedy contemporary shortfalls in staffing and experience at the bedside. Physician and physician trainee perceptions of TCC practice and education can help inform programmatic and curricular decisions. The perceptions of TCC and a formalized structured TCC rotation from faculty and trainees are unknown.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate perceptions of TCC practice and education among participating physicians and trainees.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Survey of physicians and trainees participating in the Emory Critical Care Center's TCC unit from 2017 to 2021 was conducted, after implementation of a structured TCC educational curriculum. Items were developed with a 5-point Likert scale.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The overall response rate was 71% (43 of 61). Most respondents felt their knowledge was used appropriately and that their recommendations were well received at the bedside. The majority perceived that the TCC program improved continuity, quality, and safety of patient care. More than half of respondents would practice TCC in the future, and most would advocate for it. Most fellows were comfortable providing patient care remotely after their rotation. The majority of respondents felt TCC did not add to their level of burnout.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This programmatic evaluation identified perceived improvements in patient care. Implementation of a TCC rotation does not seem to negatively impact the educational experience of trainees.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22295,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Telemedicine reports\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"201-205\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9811849/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Telemedicine reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/tmr.2022.0037\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Telemedicine reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/tmr.2022.0037","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Physician and Trainee Perceptions of Telecritical Care Practice and Education: Results of a Programmatic Survey.
Background: Telecritical care (TCC) as a telehealth modality seeks to remedy contemporary shortfalls in staffing and experience at the bedside. Physician and physician trainee perceptions of TCC practice and education can help inform programmatic and curricular decisions. The perceptions of TCC and a formalized structured TCC rotation from faculty and trainees are unknown.
Objective: To evaluate perceptions of TCC practice and education among participating physicians and trainees.
Methods: Survey of physicians and trainees participating in the Emory Critical Care Center's TCC unit from 2017 to 2021 was conducted, after implementation of a structured TCC educational curriculum. Items were developed with a 5-point Likert scale.
Results: The overall response rate was 71% (43 of 61). Most respondents felt their knowledge was used appropriately and that their recommendations were well received at the bedside. The majority perceived that the TCC program improved continuity, quality, and safety of patient care. More than half of respondents would practice TCC in the future, and most would advocate for it. Most fellows were comfortable providing patient care remotely after their rotation. The majority of respondents felt TCC did not add to their level of burnout.
Conclusions: This programmatic evaluation identified perceived improvements in patient care. Implementation of a TCC rotation does not seem to negatively impact the educational experience of trainees.