511:通过长扩增子IGH链测序对DNA和RNA作为输入物质进行克隆谱系和体细胞超突变分析

Michelle A. Toro, G. Lowman, Loni Pickle, Stephanie Ostresh, M. Andersen, S. Sarda, Chenchen Yang
{"title":"511:通过长扩增子IGH链测序对DNA和RNA作为输入物质进行克隆谱系和体细胞超突变分析","authors":"Michelle A. Toro, G. Lowman, Loni Pickle, Stephanie Ostresh, M. Andersen, S. Sarda, Chenchen Yang","doi":"10.1158/1538-7445.AM2021-511","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Traditional next generation sequencing methods for quantifying somatic hypermutation (SHM) rely on multiplex primers targeting either the framework 1 (FR1) or Leader regions of the IGH variable gene in combination with joining gene primers to amplify rearranged IGH chains from gDNA templates. Ion AmpliSeq primer panels for SHM evaluation were compared using both DNA and RNA input. Performance was compared using SHM values obtained from RNA samples amplified using FR1 variable gene primers in combination with constant gene primers to determine each IGH isotype and subtype in a single PCR reaction. Comparison of SHM frequencies measured from matched RNA and DNA samples were used to determine the feasibility for use of RNA in the study of SHM as well as comparison of the performance of Leader and FR1 gene primers in DNA studies. Methods Two multiplex primer panels were developed for DNA templates. These panels target the Leader or FR1 regions of the IGHV gene and the IGHJ gene. RNA samples were surveyed using FR1 and constant region primers. Comparisons of SHM frequency using 200ng of gDNA and 25ng of RNA from B cell lines and clinical research samples. Sequencing was accomplished using the Ion Gene Studio S5, while clonotyping, isotype determination, and somatic hypermutation analysis was performed using Ion Reporter 5.16 analysis software. Results Both RNA and DNA input assay workflows were able to correctly determine the SHM status of all rearrangements tested. IGHV SHM values were highly concordant between both RNA and DNA approaches. Additionally, SHM values derived from FR1 targeting variable gene primers delivered concordant results compared to Leader targeting variable gene primers when using DNA input across a wide range of SHM frequencies tested. Conclusions These results support the ability of highly multiplexed long-read NGS assays to accurately quantify SHM in either DNA or RNA samples. Concordant results were shown between FR1 and Leader targeting primers using DNA input. RNA based NGS methods benefit from lower sample requirements as well as the addition of isotype (and subtype) identification, opening new research areas for study of the B cell immune repertoire. Citation Format: Michelle Toro, Geoffrey Lowman, Loni Pickle, Stephanie Ostresh, Mark Andersen, Shrutii Sarda, Chenchen Yang. Clonal lineage and somatic hypermutation analysis comparing DNA and RNA as input material by long amplicon IGH chain sequencing [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2021; 2021 Apr 10-15 and May 17-21. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(13_Suppl):Abstract nr 511.","PeriodicalId":10518,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Research (Excluding Clinical Trials)","volume":"16 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Abstract 511: Clonal lineage and somatic hypermutation analysis comparing DNA and RNA as input material by long amplicon IGH chain sequencing\",\"authors\":\"Michelle A. Toro, G. Lowman, Loni Pickle, Stephanie Ostresh, M. Andersen, S. Sarda, Chenchen Yang\",\"doi\":\"10.1158/1538-7445.AM2021-511\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background Traditional next generation sequencing methods for quantifying somatic hypermutation (SHM) rely on multiplex primers targeting either the framework 1 (FR1) or Leader regions of the IGH variable gene in combination with joining gene primers to amplify rearranged IGH chains from gDNA templates. Ion AmpliSeq primer panels for SHM evaluation were compared using both DNA and RNA input. Performance was compared using SHM values obtained from RNA samples amplified using FR1 variable gene primers in combination with constant gene primers to determine each IGH isotype and subtype in a single PCR reaction. Comparison of SHM frequencies measured from matched RNA and DNA samples were used to determine the feasibility for use of RNA in the study of SHM as well as comparison of the performance of Leader and FR1 gene primers in DNA studies. Methods Two multiplex primer panels were developed for DNA templates. These panels target the Leader or FR1 regions of the IGHV gene and the IGHJ gene. RNA samples were surveyed using FR1 and constant region primers. Comparisons of SHM frequency using 200ng of gDNA and 25ng of RNA from B cell lines and clinical research samples. Sequencing was accomplished using the Ion Gene Studio S5, while clonotyping, isotype determination, and somatic hypermutation analysis was performed using Ion Reporter 5.16 analysis software. Results Both RNA and DNA input assay workflows were able to correctly determine the SHM status of all rearrangements tested. IGHV SHM values were highly concordant between both RNA and DNA approaches. Additionally, SHM values derived from FR1 targeting variable gene primers delivered concordant results compared to Leader targeting variable gene primers when using DNA input across a wide range of SHM frequencies tested. Conclusions These results support the ability of highly multiplexed long-read NGS assays to accurately quantify SHM in either DNA or RNA samples. Concordant results were shown between FR1 and Leader targeting primers using DNA input. RNA based NGS methods benefit from lower sample requirements as well as the addition of isotype (and subtype) identification, opening new research areas for study of the B cell immune repertoire. Citation Format: Michelle Toro, Geoffrey Lowman, Loni Pickle, Stephanie Ostresh, Mark Andersen, Shrutii Sarda, Chenchen Yang. Clonal lineage and somatic hypermutation analysis comparing DNA and RNA as input material by long amplicon IGH chain sequencing [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2021; 2021 Apr 10-15 and May 17-21. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(13_Suppl):Abstract nr 511.\",\"PeriodicalId\":10518,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Research (Excluding Clinical Trials)\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Research (Excluding Clinical Trials)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1158/1538-7445.AM2021-511\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Research (Excluding Clinical Trials)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1158/1538-7445.AM2021-511","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

传统的下一代体细胞超突变(SHM)定量测序方法依赖于针对IGH可变基因框架1 (FR1)或前导区的多重引物,结合连接基因引物从gDNA模板中扩增重排的IGH链。使用DNA和RNA输入对用于SHM评价的离子AmpliSeq引物板进行比较。使用FR1可变基因引物和恒定基因引物扩增的RNA样品获得的SHM值来比较性能,以确定单个PCR反应中的每个IGH同型和亚型。通过比较匹配RNA和DNA样本测量的SHM频率来确定RNA在SHM研究中使用的可行性,以及比较Leader和FR1基因引物在DNA研究中的性能。方法建立DNA模板的多重引物板。这些面板靶向IGHV基因和IGHJ基因的Leader或FR1区域。使用FR1和恒定区引物对RNA样品进行检测。比较200ng gDNA和25ng RNA对B细胞系和临床研究样本SHM频率的影响。测序使用Ion Gene Studio S5完成,克隆分型、同型测定和体细胞超突变分析使用Ion Reporter 5.16分析软件。结果RNA和DNA输入检测流程均能正确判断所有重排的SHM状态。RNA和DNA方法的IGHV SHM值高度一致。此外,在广泛的SHM频率测试中,当使用DNA输入时,FR1靶向可变基因引物获得的SHM值与Leader靶向可变基因引物获得的结果一致。这些结果支持高复用长读NGS测定法准确定量DNA或RNA样品中的SHM的能力。使用DNA输入的FR1和Leader靶向引物结果一致。基于RNA的NGS方法受益于较低的样品要求以及增加的同型(和亚型)鉴定,为研究B细胞免疫库开辟了新的研究领域。引文格式:Michelle Toro, Geoffrey Lowman, Loni Pickle, Stephanie Ostresh, Mark Andersen, Shrutii Sarda, Chenchen Yang。通过长扩增子IGH链测序比较DNA和RNA作为输入物质的克隆谱系和体细胞超突变分析[摘要]。见:美国癌症研究协会2021年年会论文集;2021年4月10日至15日和5月17日至21日。费城(PA): AACR;癌症杂志,2021;81(13 -增刊):511。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Abstract 511: Clonal lineage and somatic hypermutation analysis comparing DNA and RNA as input material by long amplicon IGH chain sequencing
Background Traditional next generation sequencing methods for quantifying somatic hypermutation (SHM) rely on multiplex primers targeting either the framework 1 (FR1) or Leader regions of the IGH variable gene in combination with joining gene primers to amplify rearranged IGH chains from gDNA templates. Ion AmpliSeq primer panels for SHM evaluation were compared using both DNA and RNA input. Performance was compared using SHM values obtained from RNA samples amplified using FR1 variable gene primers in combination with constant gene primers to determine each IGH isotype and subtype in a single PCR reaction. Comparison of SHM frequencies measured from matched RNA and DNA samples were used to determine the feasibility for use of RNA in the study of SHM as well as comparison of the performance of Leader and FR1 gene primers in DNA studies. Methods Two multiplex primer panels were developed for DNA templates. These panels target the Leader or FR1 regions of the IGHV gene and the IGHJ gene. RNA samples were surveyed using FR1 and constant region primers. Comparisons of SHM frequency using 200ng of gDNA and 25ng of RNA from B cell lines and clinical research samples. Sequencing was accomplished using the Ion Gene Studio S5, while clonotyping, isotype determination, and somatic hypermutation analysis was performed using Ion Reporter 5.16 analysis software. Results Both RNA and DNA input assay workflows were able to correctly determine the SHM status of all rearrangements tested. IGHV SHM values were highly concordant between both RNA and DNA approaches. Additionally, SHM values derived from FR1 targeting variable gene primers delivered concordant results compared to Leader targeting variable gene primers when using DNA input across a wide range of SHM frequencies tested. Conclusions These results support the ability of highly multiplexed long-read NGS assays to accurately quantify SHM in either DNA or RNA samples. Concordant results were shown between FR1 and Leader targeting primers using DNA input. RNA based NGS methods benefit from lower sample requirements as well as the addition of isotype (and subtype) identification, opening new research areas for study of the B cell immune repertoire. Citation Format: Michelle Toro, Geoffrey Lowman, Loni Pickle, Stephanie Ostresh, Mark Andersen, Shrutii Sarda, Chenchen Yang. Clonal lineage and somatic hypermutation analysis comparing DNA and RNA as input material by long amplicon IGH chain sequencing [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2021; 2021 Apr 10-15 and May 17-21. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(13_Suppl):Abstract nr 511.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Abstract 470: Evaluation of two receptor tyrosine kinase (ROS1) clones by immunohistochemistry Abstract 586: Expression of CD68 on CKpos/CD45poscirculating cells in breast cancer patients: An additional hint supporting the fusion hybrid theory Abstract 401: Comparison of molecular response calculations for prediction of patient outcome Abstract LB061: On-target peripheral and tumor immune microenvironment modulation in patients treated with lacnotuzumab (anti-CSF1, MCS110) + spartalizumab Abstract 550: Cell-free DNA alterations in theAR/enhancer locus measured before AR signaling inhibition portend poor overall survival in metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer patients
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1