{"title":"Re/通过实践制定移民政策","authors":"Kathryn Tomko Dennler","doi":"10.3167/ARMS.2017.010108","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Refused asylum seekers living in the UK face hostility and legal restrictions\non the basis of immigration status that limit access to statutory support, employment,\nand social goods. Working at a non-profit organization that offered an advice service\nfor refused asylum seekers, I observed how the experiences of refused asylum seekers\nare constituted not simply by restrictions within immigration law, but rather by the\nways in which laws are perceived and implemented by a wide range of actors. I argue\nthat the legal consciousness of social workers hostile to refused asylum seekers plays\nan important role in making policy through practice. I show that social workers prioritized\nimmigration enforcement over other legal obligations, thereby amplifying the\nmeaning of immigration status and deepening the marginalization of refused asylum\nseekers.","PeriodicalId":52702,"journal":{"name":"Migration and Society","volume":"25 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Re/Making Immigration Policy through Practice\",\"authors\":\"Kathryn Tomko Dennler\",\"doi\":\"10.3167/ARMS.2017.010108\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Refused asylum seekers living in the UK face hostility and legal restrictions\\non the basis of immigration status that limit access to statutory support, employment,\\nand social goods. Working at a non-profit organization that offered an advice service\\nfor refused asylum seekers, I observed how the experiences of refused asylum seekers\\nare constituted not simply by restrictions within immigration law, but rather by the\\nways in which laws are perceived and implemented by a wide range of actors. I argue\\nthat the legal consciousness of social workers hostile to refused asylum seekers plays\\nan important role in making policy through practice. I show that social workers prioritized\\nimmigration enforcement over other legal obligations, thereby amplifying the\\nmeaning of immigration status and deepening the marginalization of refused asylum\\nseekers.\",\"PeriodicalId\":52702,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Migration and Society\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Migration and Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3167/ARMS.2017.010108\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Migration and Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3167/ARMS.2017.010108","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
Refused asylum seekers living in the UK face hostility and legal restrictions
on the basis of immigration status that limit access to statutory support, employment,
and social goods. Working at a non-profit organization that offered an advice service
for refused asylum seekers, I observed how the experiences of refused asylum seekers
are constituted not simply by restrictions within immigration law, but rather by the
ways in which laws are perceived and implemented by a wide range of actors. I argue
that the legal consciousness of social workers hostile to refused asylum seekers plays
an important role in making policy through practice. I show that social workers prioritized
immigration enforcement over other legal obligations, thereby amplifying the
meaning of immigration status and deepening the marginalization of refused asylum
seekers.